![]() |
|
|
#31 |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,131
|
Re: Bengals 2010
They've kept the right guy....now dump the wrong one.
Good start so far!
__________________
An excited shade of Red
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
First Time Caller
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,228
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Is it that hard to teach a running back to catch the ball? Or is Cedric Benson just not a guy who would catch and run anyway? But I agree with you TS, and even though I think the Bengals need some help to give them more throwing options, building a defensive powerhouse can't hurt.
__________________
Dusty Baker, second shooter. --Confirmed on Redszone. |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,133
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Problem with that is the Bengals have $100MM wrapped around Carson Palmer. If they're going to have a great defense (like the Ravens in 2000), you need the majority of your payroll wrapped around it. And you can't have a $100MM QB.
__________________
That hit was plenty fair. Atleast by a quarter of an inch. -Steve Stone |
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: Bengals 2010
That long article on Bratkowski didn't hit on his biggest issues such as playcalling. Why don't we run the no huddle? Palmer ran it very well 4 yrs ago. Why not now? Why don't we have a bubble screen in our playbook? We can't this offense execute a slant pattern? These are simple things that even rookie QBs can do.
Why did the offense lead the league in penalties? As for Palmer his biggest problem was not looking off receivers. He locked onto them. He needs to work on that skill for 2010. I don't think Brat knows the problems with this offense and for that reason is not the guy to turn it around |
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Joey Votto Fangirl
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 2,518
|
Re: Bengals 2010
I'm SOOOOO glad they kept Zimmer in Cincy!
![]() Now let's get going on fixing this whole offense problem, LOL :
__________________
"I tried to play golf, but I found out I wasn't very good." -Joey Votto on his offseason hobby search ![]() An MLB.com reporter asked what one thing Votto couldn’t do. “I can’t skate or play hockey,” Votto said. “Well, I can skate ... but I can’t stop.”
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,666
|
Re: Bengals 2010
I'm a little slow on the trigger, came to post the news about Zimm, but see I am way behing, so I'll just say
Woo Hoo! Good news for the Bengals.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Test for fancy coffee
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 402
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Wasn't expecting this to happen so soon. I figured it would be a long drawn out process that would keep us in suspense. Kudos to Mike Brown for getting it done.
__________________
My name is Cheesy Beef Burrito |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,361
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Now that we know Zimmer will be back I expect the defense to be even better once they get some guys healthy. Time to concentrate on the offense.
__________________
"Now that's a real shame when folks be throwin' away a perfectly good white boy like that." |
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 16,437
|
Re: Bengals 2010
That is fantastic news on Zimmer. The defense just keeps improving under Zimmer and next year should be another good year for the defense as some of the injured players come back.
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
A Little to the Left
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bexley, OH
Posts: 7,417
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Mike Brown really hasn't been as horrible as usual in the past 12 months, apart from the Andre Smith negotiations, and it's hard to tell who's really at fault with that sort of thing. Maybe we are entering an age where the Bengals will really just be a normal football team? I probably shouldn't be optimistic here, but the quickness of the Zimmer thing really surprised me.
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. --Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,727
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Quote:
It really depends on our younger players improving next season, which I think they will do. I think our offense can improve drastically just by signing a few stop gap players |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: Bengals 2010
WOO HOO!
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: All over
Posts: 6,940
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Hallelujah!
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
A Little to the Left
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bexley, OH
Posts: 7,417
|
Re: Bengals 2010
I don't like Bratkowski either particularly, but given enough talent he can make an offense work, he's shown that in the past. I'd give someone else another chance if it were my team obviously, but the Bengals can win with him as coordinator.
I really think the Bengals just need a shutdown offensive line again that works in both the passing and running game. Palmer doesn't seem to trust his line at all, and the pocket collapses pretty frequently, I think that would solve a lot of issues. And it goes without saying they need another decent receiver or two.
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. --Oscar Wilde |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |