RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-20-2010, 09:21 AM   #121
Kingspoint
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: All over
Posts: 6,954
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redhook View Post
Now C'mon. Thanking Mike Brown for anything is taking it too far. I understand your dislike for Marvin, but Mike Brown hasn't changed and is certainly not the reason the Bengals have had 2 winning seasons out of the last 5. Mike Brown is an embarrassment to Cincinnati Bengals football and that will likely never change.
Putting all dislike for anyone aside, this was a great reward for the entire team. They get to be proud for having earned it together as a team. I'm sure they are all proud to have earned it for Marvin Lewis. It can only make everyone on the team closer.
Kingspoint is offline  
Turn Off Ads?
Old 01-20-2010, 05:26 PM   #122
traderumor
Unsolicited Opinions
 
traderumor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,744
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingspoint View Post
You didn't read the post. I was extremely clear. There has never been any "interest" for the worst Head Coach in the NFL. "Interest" is brandied about all the time while Head Coaches are still under contract. My jab is fact.
Reading this and your subsequent posts, it is clear that you have an extreme view, bringing into question any "facts" you may attempt to present.
__________________
Can't win with 'em

Can't win without 'em
traderumor is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 10:47 AM   #123
redsfandan
Member
 
redsfandan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,371
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Bengals special teams coach Darrin Simmons says that Shayne Graham's two misses in the Wild Card loss to the Jets has put the kicker's future with the organization under the microscope.

The Cincinnati Enquirer has already reported that the Bengals will "very likely" let Graham walk as a free agent and Simmons did nothing to quiet that notion. "Snaps were good. Holds were good. There’s no excuse. He picked a hell of a time to have a bad game," Simmons said.
__________________
"Now that's a real shame when folks be throwin' away a perfectly good white boy like that."
redsfandan is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 12:08 PM   #124
redsfandan
Member
 
redsfandan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,371
Re: Bengals 2010

I haven't been in this thread since 1/12 but I felt I should still respond to this post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamSelig View Post
Replace Coles with a different vet receiver who can actually catch a ball consistently, and our offense is 2x better already.

Our running game is very good. We have a QB.... who USED to be pretty dominate (what happened!?) Hopefully he bounces back. I think you have to count on that. We have an elite receiver. We just need another solid receiver and a TE who can catch a ball. There is a chance that we have these needs on the team already.

What I mean is I'd rather have Average offense + Great Defense instead of Good offense + Good defense.

Maybe I just think the offense is easier to correct than you do. A new OC would instantly improve our offense IMO.
I think that's part of it but I also think that the defense already has the potential to be one of the very best next year and it just doesn't seem like you share that view.

Between key players missing time due to injury (Odom/Peko/etc) and inexperience (Maualuga/Rivers should only improve with more experience) I think the defense is in pretty good shape with a little better luck as far as injuries go. I'm in no way saying that they shouldn't add to the defense. I just think the offense is a higher priority. The defense wasn't a problem in '09. The offense was a problem.
__________________
"Now that's a real shame when folks be throwin' away a perfectly good white boy like that."
redsfandan is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 02:30 PM   #125
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: Bengals 2010

Improving the team speed on offense could and should help. I would definitely look at adding speed at the WR position as well as the TE position. We need a burner on the edge who can stretch the field. Look at the seperation the Colts got yesterday with Garcon and Collie, both pretty speedy receivers who run good routes.

I am all for taking a wideout or a TE in the first round if a good one is there.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 04:04 PM   #126
ChazzReinhold
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsfandan View Post
Bengals special teams coach Darrin Simmons says that Shayne Graham's two misses in the Wild Card loss to the Jets has put the kicker's future with the organization under the microscope.

The Cincinnati Enquirer has already reported that the Bengals will "very likely" let Graham walk as a free agent and Simmons did nothing to quiet that notion. "Snaps were good. Holds were good. There’s no excuse. He picked a hell of a time to have a bad game," Simmons said.
What about the '05 playoffs? What about the '06 regular season miss vs PIttsburgh? It's not like his performance to choke in big games was an abberation.

With all that said, WR should be the #1 target for the Bengals. If they don't pick a WR, Greshman should be the choice if he's still available.

Last edited by ChazzReinhold; 01-25-2010 at 04:08 PM.
ChazzReinhold is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 10:52 PM   #127
TeamSelig
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,727
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsfandan View Post
I haven't been in this thread since 1/12 but I felt I should still respond to this post:

I think that's part of it but I also think that the defense already has the potential to be one of the very best next year and it just doesn't seem like you share that view.

Between key players missing time due to injury (Odom/Peko/etc) and inexperience (Maualuga/Rivers should only improve with more experience) I think the defense is in pretty good shape with a little better luck as far as injuries go. I'm in no way saying that they shouldn't add to the defense. I just think the offense is a higher priority. The defense wasn't a problem in '09. The offense was a problem.
I think we have a potentially great defense, I just think we lack any kind of depth.
TeamSelig is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 11:00 PM   #128
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,281
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamSelig View Post
I think we have a potentially great defense, I just think we lack any kind of depth.
We must have had very good depth this year in order to survive all the injuries. We lost Odom, Rey M, Tank, Roy Williams, Peko, Jeanty, & Crocker to significant injuries this year. That's an awful lot. I'd say their depth was very good to be able to withstand all of that.
Sea Ray is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 12:17 AM   #129
TeamSelig
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,727
Re: Bengals 2010

We played pretty poorly at the end of the season too. We still played okay once Odom was hurt, but when Peko got hurt, it really killed us.
TeamSelig is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 05:36 AM   #130
Kingspoint
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: All over
Posts: 6,954
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamSelig View Post
We played pretty poorly at the end of the season too. We still played okay once Odom was hurt, but when Peko got hurt, it really killed us.
Rotoworld thinks we should draft a DT with their first 2010 Mock Draft.
Kingspoint is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 07:40 AM   #131
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingspoint View Post
Rotoworld thinks we should draft a DT with their first 2010 Mock Draft.
So far the mock's have been all over the board on the Bengals. Several stating a WR or TE and some saying we should go with defense. I would love a speedy wideout or a good TE, depends on the combine and who falls to us I suppose.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 08:16 AM   #132
bucksfan2
Waitin til next year
 
bucksfan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,650
Re: Bengals 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by KoryMac5 View Post
So far the mock's have been all over the board on the Bengals. Several stating a WR or TE and some saying we should go with defense. I would love a speedy wideout or a good TE, depends on the combine and who falls to us I suppose.
Hernandez = Chase Coffmann. The Bengals employ a block first, catch pass second form or TE. Think Heath Miller or Todd Heap. Taking Hernandez, whom I have seen some mock drafts predict, makes little sense to me. The guy isn't the type of TE the Bengals use.

My list would be LT, WR, S, RB, QB, CB in that order. LT is the obvious need. Shift Whitworth back to G and get a bonified LT to help with the pass blocking. Need a WR to stretch the field. I would entertain trade ideas for both Marshall and Boldin, but use a 2nd rounder to try to fill that void. S is the next pressing need with depth needed at RB (especially one who can play in the return game), QB (Carson's heir apparent), and CB.
bucksfan2 is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 08:44 AM   #133
Redsfaithful
A Little to the Left
 
Redsfaithful's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bexley, OH
Posts: 7,417
Re: Bengals 2010

I think Whitworth only gave up one sack this year for whatever it's worth, and Marvin has been pretty vocal about him being great at left tackle. I think they see him as a good fit there, so I'm hoping they get a guard in the second round. Whitworth-New Guard-Cook-Williams-Smith could be a pretty decent line I think.

I think they need offensive help myself, but I also wouldn't be opposed to getting a safety in the first round. I'm hoping for safety or wide receiver first round and then best player available that fits after that.
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
--Oscar Wilde
Redsfaithful is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 09:29 AM   #134
camisadelgolf
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
 
camisadelgolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
Re: Bengals 2010

I would love for the Bengals to draft an interior lineman as long as he projects to be elite. If the Bengals had Steve Hutchinson, it would have had a huge impact on their offensive production imo.
camisadelgolf is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 10:50 AM   #135
Tony Cloninger
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,253
Re: Bengals 2010

Just do not ignore the defense....like they ignored the offense pretty much in 05-08.....and before you realize it...your offense sucks beacuse of injuries/bad later picks you do get or players who under-achieve.

It happened in the late 80's when they went all out on defense and kept drafting lineman really late in the draft....and think McNally would turn them to gold like he did Kozerski and Reimers and Montoya...who were drafted after the 5th-6th rounds. Before you know it...you have Kevin Sargent manning the LT and people like Ken Moyer and Scott Brumfield manning your G positions.
Tony Cloninger is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25