![]() |
|
|
#121 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: All over
Posts: 6,939
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#122 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,636
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Reading this and your subsequent posts, it is clear that you have an extreme view, bringing into question any "facts" you may attempt to present.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
#123 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,352
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Quote:
__________________
"Now that's a real shame when folks be throwin' away a perfectly good white boy like that." |
|
|
|
|
|
#124 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,352
|
Re: Bengals 2010
I haven't been in this thread since 1/12 but I felt I should still respond to this post:
Quote:
Between key players missing time due to injury (Odom/Peko/etc) and inexperience (Maualuga/Rivers should only improve with more experience) I think the defense is in pretty good shape with a little better luck as far as injuries go. I'm in no way saying that they shouldn't add to the defense. I just think the offense is a higher priority. The defense wasn't a problem in '09. The offense was a problem.
__________________
"Now that's a real shame when folks be throwin' away a perfectly good white boy like that." |
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Improving the team speed on offense could and should help. I would definitely look at adding speed at the WR position as well as the TE position. We need a burner on the edge who can stretch the field. Look at the seperation the Colts got yesterday with Garcon and Collie, both pretty speedy receivers who run good routes.
I am all for taking a wideout or a TE in the first round if a good one is there.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
#126 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Quote:
With all that said, WR should be the #1 target for the Bengals. If they don't pick a WR, Greshman should be the choice if he's still available. Last edited by ChazzReinhold; 01-25-2010 at 04:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#127 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,727
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,254
|
Re: Bengals 2010
We must have had very good depth this year in order to survive all the injuries. We lost Odom, Rey M, Tank, Roy Williams, Peko, Jeanty, & Crocker to significant injuries this year. That's an awful lot. I'd say their depth was very good to be able to withstand all of that.
|
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,727
|
Re: Bengals 2010
We played pretty poorly at the end of the season too. We still played okay once Odom was hurt, but when Peko got hurt, it really killed us.
|
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: All over
Posts: 6,939
|
Re: Bengals 2010
|
|
|
|
|
#131 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: Bengals 2010
So far the mock's have been all over the board on the Bengals. Several stating a WR or TE and some saying we should go with defense. I would love a speedy wideout or a good TE, depends on the combine and who falls to us I suppose.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
#132 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,610
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Quote:
My list would be LT, WR, S, RB, QB, CB in that order. LT is the obvious need. Shift Whitworth back to G and get a bonified LT to help with the pass blocking. Need a WR to stretch the field. I would entertain trade ideas for both Marshall and Boldin, but use a 2nd rounder to try to fill that void. S is the next pressing need with depth needed at RB (especially one who can play in the return game), QB (Carson's heir apparent), and CB. |
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
A Little to the Left
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bexley, OH
Posts: 7,417
|
Re: Bengals 2010
I think Whitworth only gave up one sack this year for whatever it's worth, and Marvin has been pretty vocal about him being great at left tackle. I think they see him as a good fit there, so I'm hoping they get a guard in the second round. Whitworth-New Guard-Cook-Williams-Smith could be a pretty decent line I think.
I think they need offensive help myself, but I also wouldn't be opposed to getting a safety in the first round. I'm hoping for safety or wide receiver first round and then best player available that fits after that.
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. --Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: Bengals 2010
I would love for the Bengals to draft an interior lineman as long as he projects to be elite. If the Bengals had Steve Hutchinson, it would have had a huge impact on their offensive production imo.
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,093
|
Re: Bengals 2010
Just do not ignore the defense....like they ignored the offense pretty much in 05-08.....and before you realize it...your offense sucks beacuse of injuries/bad later picks you do get or players who under-achieve.
It happened in the late 80's when they went all out on defense and kept drafting lineman really late in the draft....and think McNally would turn them to gold like he did Kozerski and Reimers and Montoya...who were drafted after the 5th-6th rounds. Before you know it...you have Kevin Sargent manning the LT and people like Ken Moyer and Scott Brumfield manning your G positions. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |