RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2010, 11:15 PM   #481
alloverjr
getting younger
 
alloverjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 1,160
Re: Cliff Lee

Are Haren and/or Drew available? If so I wouldn't waste my time bidding up Lee if that means the price ultimately goes up for Haren. Although for my money I'd go after a shortstop as hard as starting pitching, but I would look to strengthen the pen.
__________________
Just have to tip your cap tonight...
alloverjr is offline  
Turn Off Ads?
Old 07-06-2010, 11:17 PM   #482
Caveat Emperor
Titanic Struggles
 
Caveat Emperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,135
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnBaseMachine View Post
Scott Rolen?
Toché, OBM.

I had horrid memories of Gary Majewski, Shawn Estes, Brian Mohler and Ryan Dempster in my head, and I overlooked one of the key components to the current roster.
__________________
Championships Matter.
22 Years and Counting...
Caveat Emperor is offline  
Old 07-06-2010, 11:24 PM   #483
TheNext44
Socratic Gadfly
 
TheNext44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,224
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caveat Emperor View Post
Maybe I'm just cynical, but I've seen midseason deal after midsesason deal blow up in the face of the Cincinnati Reds. I honestly cannot remember the last time the team added a player who did anything remotely close to what the team needed / wanted them to do. It seems like these things always backfire for this franchise.

Am I the only one who expects Lee, if he were to come to Cincinnati, to immediately become ineffective and post an over-4.00 ERA the rest of the way? It just seems that's how this story would end.
I'm not convinced that Lee will be as great as people are expecting.

But the Reds really haven't been in this situation in the last ten years. The last time they truly were in contention was 1999. That year they got Juan Guzman for B.J. Ryan, and Guzman was very effective for the Reds down the stretch. Sure, they kinda were in contention a few times, but they were more than a few players away from really contending. I think it was more that the teams just weren't that good, than the trade didn't work out, or at least some of both.

I think this year the Reds are actually a better team than 1999, and one key player can make them into nit just contendere, but favorites.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein
TheNext44 is offline  
Old 07-06-2010, 11:27 PM   #484
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,432
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by alloverjr View Post
Are Haren and/or Drew available? If so I wouldn't waste my time bidding up Lee if that means the price ultimately goes up for Haren. Although for my money I'd go after a shortstop as hard as starting pitching, but I would look to strengthen the pen.
Reportedly.

I'd offer Bailey, Wood, Alonso and Cozart for Haren and Drew. Makes us much better for this year and still better for the future.
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline  
Old 07-06-2010, 11:39 PM   #485
kbrake
Member
 
kbrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,908
Re: Cliff Lee

Not sure how people are worried about how Lee would hold up in GABP but think Haren is a good idea...I just don't get it.
kbrake is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 12:14 AM   #486
Cedric
Member
 
Cedric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Monroe
Posts: 6,218
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbrake View Post
Not sure how people are worried about how Lee would hold up in GABP but think Haren is a good idea...I just don't get it.
People like thinking outside the box and not exactly rationally. What's fun for them in agreeing with the obvious that Lee is light years better than Dan Haren?
__________________
This is the time. The real Reds organization is back.
Cedric is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 12:20 AM   #487
nemesis
Resident PED Expert
 
nemesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Washington, PA
Posts: 1,366
Re: Cliff Lee

Haren is my first choice. I've said it in other posts, Price was his pitching coach thru his 2 best years. Do not underrate that connection and what it could do for Haren.

The absolute best packages I would do for Lee is:

Alonso, Francisco and Boxberger

Alonso, Francisco, Sappelt and Del Rosario

Alonso and Bailey (include Francisco for League)

Alonso, Valakia and Maloney

Any conversation including Wood, Joseph or Mez ends the discussion.

Lee and Wood being on the same staff could benefit Wood tremendously. They already are offseason workout partners. If just a little of Lee rubs off, Wood could be as good as a #2 or #3.

Take your pick Seattle.


Haren and Drew I'd give up more.

Start with Bailey, Alonso and Sulbaran

1 of Francisco, Heisey, Cozart or Frazier

1 of Del Rosario, Fisher, Valiquette, Smith or Ondrusek
__________________
If you can't be a good example... then you'll just have to be a horrible warning...

Nothing tastes as good as being fit feels...
nemesis is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 12:42 AM   #488
guttle11
Raaaaaaaandy
 
guttle11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,118
Re: Cliff Lee

I wouldn't include Ondrusek in a trade unless a legit bullpen guy also makes his way to Cincy in that trade or soon after. Logan has been a real bright spot since coming back up.
__________________
"I saw Wedding Crashers accidentally. I bought a ticket for Grizzly Man and went into the wrong theater. After an hour, I figured I was in the wrong theater, but I kept waiting. That’s the thing about bear attacks. They come when you least expect it."-Dwight K. Schrute
guttle11 is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 12:44 AM   #489
VR
Member
 
VR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Vancouver, Wa
Posts: 8,218
Re: Cliff Lee

Just get him. I don't care about the details.
__________________
“Our team is a team full of fighters. They never panic. We don't necessarily get all the hits we want all the time, but we find a way to win.” – Dusty Baker
VR is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 12:54 AM   #490
nemesis
Resident PED Expert
 
nemesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Washington, PA
Posts: 1,366
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by VR View Post
Just get him. I don't care about the details.
The details do matter though. There is a limit on what he is worth to the teams future. The Reds have to be careful of what pieces they give up to not mortgage the future for a 18 game rental.
__________________
If you can't be a good example... then you'll just have to be a horrible warning...

Nothing tastes as good as being fit feels...
nemesis is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 12:57 AM   #491
OnBaseMachine
Member
 
OnBaseMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,660
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caveat Emperor View Post
Toché, OBM.

I had horrid memories of Gary Majewski, Shawn Estes, Brian Mohler and Ryan Dempster in my head, and I overlooked one of the key components to the current roster.
I understand your skepticism, it seems like most things have gone wrong for the Reds the past 10 years. But in this case, I think Cliff Lee is a much, much safer bet than Estes or Moehler. Those guys were back of the rotation starters. Cliff Lee is a legit ace, and arguably the best starting pitcher in baseball right now. IMO, Cliff Lee makes this team a legitimate World Series contender.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn.
OnBaseMachine is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 01:11 AM   #492
TheNext44
Socratic Gadfly
 
TheNext44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,224
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cedric View Post
People like thinking outside the box and not exactly rationally. What's fun for them in agreeing with the obvious that Lee is light years better than Dan Haren?
I could actually argue that Haren is better than Lee.

The last three years:

Haren

xFIP 3.25
WHIP 1.117
K/9 8.7
GB/FB 1.16

Lee

xFIP 3.50
WHIP 1.135
K/9 7.1
GB/FB 1.00

This year Lee has been better, but some of that is due to his pitching in Safco, as his xFIP indicates. He is actually more of a flyball pitcher than Haren, which is why some have concern over how good he will be in GABP.

Add in that Haren is under control for an extra year, and it's really hard to defend that Lee is light years better than Haren, if he is better at all.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein
TheNext44 is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 01:23 AM   #493
fearofpopvol1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,634
Re: Cliff Lee

They want Francisco? Sign me up! I wouldn't think twice about trading Alonso and Francisco to the M's for Lee. If they want Wood too, I think the M's have to send something else back to us. However, I would probably move forward with that.

As long as they aren't parting with Chapman, Mesocaro and Y. Rodriguez, I'll be happy.
fearofpopvol1 is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 01:36 AM   #494
*BaseClogger*
WOOOOO!!!
 
*BaseClogger*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,078
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caveat Emperor View Post
Maybe I'm just cynical, but I've seen midseason deal after midsesason deal blow up in the face of the Cincinnati Reds. I honestly cannot remember the last time the team added a player who did anything remotely close to what the team needed / wanted them to do. It seems like these things always backfire for this franchise.
It's been 11 years:

Juan Guzman
77.1 IP, 3.03 ERA
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me."
*BaseClogger* is offline  
Old 07-07-2010, 01:41 AM   #495
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: Cliff Lee

Quote:
Originally Posted by kbrake View Post
Not sure how people are worried about how Lee would hold up in GABP but think Haren is a good idea...I just don't get it.
Your giving up prospects for Lee for basically two months. Where as with Haren and Drew you have them under team control for a little longer. If I am going to be paying a King's ransome for a difference maker I would at least want to see the player(s) perform for a full season in Red.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25