RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-30-2010, 04:13 PM   #46
Will M
Brett William Moore
 
Will M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crescent Springs KY
Posts: 3,513
Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
That option escalates to $13 Million based on IP. Considering that he goes deep in games and never misses a start, he'll be a $13 Million guy next year.

Bringing Arroyo back should be the minimum that they do for 2011. I'd rather they pass and use the money for the TOR.
Its tough to pay a $2M buyout. Its also tough to pay a solid to good pitcher $13M. Thats a TOR salary & Bronson isn't close to that.
However, the $2M is a sunk cost. Would I pay Bronson $11M for 2011 or would i let him go & put the money to work elsewhere? I say wait & see how Volquez, Bailey & Chapman do for the rest of 2010 before making that decision.
__________________
.
Will M is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 07-30-2010, 04:20 PM   #47
thatcoolguy_22
Battle Toad Historian
 
thatcoolguy_22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pyeongtaek, ROK
Posts: 1,656
Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

I don't like paying Bronson 13 million for a minimum upgrade over league minimum players in house already. Decline the option and attempt to resign him cheaply. If not you now have 13m to put towards upgrading the club in other places.
__________________
A lil more east than most on this board.
thatcoolguy_22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 04:34 PM   #48
camisadelgolf
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
 
camisadelgolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

Quote:
Originally Posted by thatcoolguy_22 View Post
I don't like paying Bronson 13 million for a minimum upgrade over league minimum players in house already. Decline the option and attempt to resign him cheaply. If not you now have 13m to put towards upgrading the club in other places.
Arroyo has already made it clear that he won't stay for a discount because he got burned by Boston. If you decline his option, he's walking.
camisadelgolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 04:38 PM   #49
_Sir_Charles_
2013 NL MVP and WS MVP
 
_Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,651
Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

I'd offer him arbitration, let him decline and move on, then take the picks. (at least I think that's how it works).

I like Bronson, but we're fighting for rotation spots as it is already, no need to do that AND fork over a ton of loot we need to sign the kids.
__________________
“If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant’s life, she will choose to save the infant’s life without even considering if there is a man on base.” —Dave Barry
_Sir_Charles_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 04:55 PM   #50
thatcoolguy_22
Battle Toad Historian
 
thatcoolguy_22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pyeongtaek, ROK
Posts: 1,656
Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

Quote:
Originally Posted by camisadelgolf View Post
Arroyo has already made it clear that he won't stay for a discount because he got burned by Boston. If you decline his option, he's walking.
I'm completely fine with that. If he is resigned him and Cordero will be 25M of the team payroll. You still have to factor in raises for Votto, BP, Vueto, Volquez, etc etc. I would rather see that bit of money going to a LTC for Votto if nothing else.
__________________
A lil more east than most on this board.
thatcoolguy_22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 05:02 PM   #51
nate
High five!
 
nate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 6,813
Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Sir_Charles_ View Post
I'd offer him arbitration, let him decline and move on, then take the picks. (at least I think that's how it works).

I like Bronson, but we're fighting for rotation spots as it is already, no need to do that AND fork over a ton of loot we need to sign the kids.
I think there's a team option for next year. $13mm if the Reds offer, $2mm buyout.
__________________
"Bring on Rod Stupid!"
nate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 05:18 PM   #52
PuffyPig
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,837
Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Sir_Charles_ View Post
I'd offer him arbitration, let him decline and move on, then take the picks. (at least I think that's how it works).
Or, you pay him $2M to decline his option, offer him arbitration, have him accept, and likely pay him more in total than the $13M you decline (after accounting for the option buyout).

Offering him arbitration is suicide.
PuffyPig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 05:27 PM   #53
camisadelgolf
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
 
camisadelgolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

Yeah, there's no way he'd earn a pay cut in arbitration. If you want him for next year, pick up the option. If you want him behind that, wait until next year to decide.
camisadelgolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25