![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 509
|
Mystery team in on Lilly?
Could the Reds be the mystery team in on Ted Lilly? I sort if hope so. Hes a great number 3 to put behind Cueto and Arroyo and plus hes a lefty. A rotation of Cueto, Arroyo, Lilly, Volquez, and Leake would be great. Plus you have Wood who could share starts with Leake at the 5. That rotation would be sick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: mason
Posts: 656
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
I hope not, he wouldn't be enough of an upgrade over current options. Put him in GABP and he'd be average at best. He'd be a good option for the Cards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
Probably the twins.
and they will probably give up Kyle Gibson because they are nuts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Formerly Farsighted Fan
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edgewood, KY
Posts: 605
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
Upgrade. We want an worthwhile upgrade. Lilly is not a piece to our playoff puzzle.
__________________
"He looked like a surfer kid from SoCal," manager Dusty Baker says. "He didn't say much, but you could tell he was cool." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,181
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
Lilly would be a nice pick up, depending on what the price is, both in terms of players and money.
I think he's an upgrade over Volquez, simply because he's more reliable. He's lost some zip on his fastball, but has done well in a pitcher's park despite it. He's a very polished, smart veteran pitcher who can go deep into games, which would compliment the young guys in the rotation well. He also would allow the Reds to give Leake more days off, which would be very valuable in the long term. But again, it depends on the price. He makes $13M this year, so he's owed around $4-5M the rest of the season. He is a type A free agent, so he would net the Reds two draft picks in the #15-70 range in next year's draft, so he should cost at least that much prospect wise. I'd offer Maloney and ask for them to pay at least half of the money due. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
All work and no play.....
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 6,847
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
Meh. Doesn't excite me.
__________________
"I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic. "Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 860
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
Ted Lilly has allowed 19 home runs, which is good for 8th most in the NL. That screams not a good fit to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Winning the Human Race
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Titletown, FL
Posts: 3,805
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
I think it is a fantastic idea. In related news, I am planning on starting a car racing circuit in which each car is only allowed to use 3 wheels. Not sure why the three wheels makes this circuit more interesting, but I just felt like I had to try something!
__________________
Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 597
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
I want nothing to do with Lilly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 461
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
So to summarize, the Reds will give away prospects to add a flyball pitcher that is marginally better than what we currently have as a #4 starter plus pick up his ugly contract and this is considered a good idea?
I am going to crawl way out on a limb here and guess the reds are not the mystery team |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 860
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 2,128
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
Quote:
PEACE -BLEEDS
__________________
I think that in a year or two, one of these guys - Frazier, Dorn, Valaika, Cumberland, Stubbs - will be ready to replace Dunn. They won't hit as many home runs as Dunn, but they should have similar OPS. - 757690, July 22, 2008 Alonso will be playing 1B for the REDS and batting 4th one year from today. - Kingspoint, July 9, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 860
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 2,128
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
Quote:
We have enough of a logjam at SP, I'm not trading for an at-best marginal upgrade at #3/#4 SP. Lilly's not going to get us over the proverbial hump. NO THANKS! IMO the only reason to acquire him is to keep him from going to the Cards, and maybe some insurance. I wouldn't give much for that at all. PEACE -BLEEDS P.S. - So which of Frazier, Dorn, Valaika, Cumberland, or Stubbs has a comparable OPS to Dunn these days anyhow?
__________________
I think that in a year or two, one of these guys - Frazier, Dorn, Valaika, Cumberland, Stubbs - will be ready to replace Dunn. They won't hit as many home runs as Dunn, but they should have similar OPS. - 757690, July 22, 2008 Alonso will be playing 1B for the REDS and batting 4th one year from today. - Kingspoint, July 9, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 2,128
|
Re: Mystery team in on Lilly?
Quote:
![]() PEACE -BLEEDS
__________________
I think that in a year or two, one of these guys - Frazier, Dorn, Valaika, Cumberland, Stubbs - will be ready to replace Dunn. They won't hit as many home runs as Dunn, but they should have similar OPS. - 757690, July 22, 2008 Alonso will be playing 1B for the REDS and batting 4th one year from today. - Kingspoint, July 9, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |