![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 305
|
9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
Phillips 2B
Cabrera SS Votto 1B Gomes LF Cairo 3B Stubbs CF Bloomquist RF Hanigan C Bailey P The Willie Bloomquist era starts tonight! I am predicting a 2-4 night with a dinger and 5 RBI from the Silent Assassin. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
Only in Dusty's brain is half of that line up better hitters than Ryan Hannigan rofl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 655
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
of all the players you give a day off too, dusty still has phillips in there. unreal. this year has taught me players really do win in spite of dusty. yea they may like him, thats great, but holy smokes. bruce has done nothing but tear the cover off the ball and hes sitting already?
anyways....12 is the magic number. thats nice |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,666
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
I am all for giving players nights off who are old and or hurting, but OMG, that doesn't mean keeping the out machines hitting 1 and 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Winning the Human Race
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Titletown, FL
Posts: 3,808
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
Join the fan club now.
__________________
Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Retro-Gamer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,631
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
Phiilips and Votto need a day off. Votto has played every game for close to a month, he is hitting .261 in Sept.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
Heres a rofl stat.
Bloomquist is 0-11 against Saunders. lololol. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Plan to be spontaneous
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinios
Posts: 1,178
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
Homer better be on his game tonight there may not be much run support backing him up.
__________________
We only live in patches. - H. G. Wells |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Plan to be spontaneous
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinios
Posts: 1,178
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
I'm sure Dusty's response to that would be "he's due!"
__________________
We only live in patches. - H. G. Wells |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Logan/Huntington, WV
Posts: 458
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
![]() :runawaycr![]()
__________________
Cincinnati Reds Marshall Thundering Herd Kentucky Wildcats Indianapolis Colts Washington Wizards |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,419
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,666
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,577
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
Eight.Runs.Easy. Did I sleep until Sunday?
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,577
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
Every Bloomquist AB versus Saunders. One ball out of the infield and a ton of weak grounders. http://www.baseball-reference.com/pl...1&n2=bloomwi01
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Winning the Human Race
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Titletown, FL
Posts: 3,808
|
Re: 9-15-10, D'backs @ Reds
Quote:
__________________
Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |