![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 16,437
|
Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
From Fay today:
http://cincinnati.com/blogs/reds/201...y-start-game-4 Nix and Hanigan will definitely start tomorrow night and Dusty is considering starting Wood if there is a game 4. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,721
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
As long as Nix is in LF, not CF, I'm OK with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Two-Time Batting Champ
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loveland, OH
Posts: 2,636
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Two-Time Batting Champ
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loveland, OH
Posts: 2,636
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Haha, I didn't even consider that possibility until you said something. Thanks for letting that thought enter into my mind :thumbdown
Any ways, what does everyone think the line-up will look like tomorrow? Dusty will likely go with Phillips Cabrera Votto Rolen Bruce Nix Stubbs Hanigan Arroyo I would go with Stubbs Bruce Votto Rolen Nix Hanigan Phillips Janish Arroyo |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Vancouver, Wa
Posts: 8,213
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
__________________
“Our team is a team full of fighters. They never panic. We don't necessarily get all the hits we want all the time, but we find a way to win.” – Dusty Baker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 859
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Janish oughta be playing too
__________________
For Love of the Game "If you aren't first; you're last" |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,915
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
I know it's small sample, but did Dusty not notice how well the offense performed when Cabrera was no longer at the top of the lineup?
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
The Franchise
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 736
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Mark Sheldon said Nix is starting in LF, so no worries.
__________________
Votto for MVP |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Franchise
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 736
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Cabrera batted .298 in the two-hole this season in 68 games.
__________________
Votto for MVP |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Worth The Wait
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 4,111
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
You can't have it both ways with Dusty, IMO.
I think the consensus is that he is a great team-builder/leader by deferring to vets and deftly managing ego's, psyche's, young players, etc... There were several times this season that the Reds could have gone south and I do believe that quality leadership was part of the reason we stayed the course. And leadership comes from the top....and it absolutely filters through Dusty. Therefore, I think we must accept that Dusty is going to be very slow to make any drastic changes involving those vets that he invests with leading the team. I don't think he could make a guy like OCab a focal point and then stick him on the bench come post-season. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,915
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
I stand corrected. Perhaps it just correlated with Stubbs and Bruce catching fire. Though the .333 OBP and .415 SLG aren't anything to write home about. I'd still prefer a better OBP threat batting ahead Votto. I don't care if Hanigan and Rolen are slow, you can't score from the dugout. Nor do I care that Bruce and Votto are both LH.
When the 9th inning comes around and the guys at the top are getting an extra PA, I want those guys to be my best hitters.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
What Me Worry?
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 26,416
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Doesn't Hanigan normally start when Arroyo is pitching anyway?
Lance Nix vs Oswalt.... Code:
AB H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS 17 9 3 1 2 4 1 2 .529 .556 1.176 1.732
__________________
"panic" only comes from having real expectations |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Mr.Redlegs is my homeboy
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,171
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 2,022
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
I can't help but to agree completely.I get what everyone is saying about Dusty and the vets and Cabrera being a great clubhouse guy.It's just that Cabrera contributed nothing last night and certainly cost the team 3 runs.For a great leader his playoff track record is poor.
Say what you want about how great Halladay was last night, but even for the great ones it's much more difficult to pitch with a one run lead opposed to cruising thru almost the entire game with a 4 run lead. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |