![]() |
|
|
#31 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,375
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
Speaking of Nix, if the Reds get a dozen hits tomorrow, I hope Laynce gets about 3 or 4 of them and forces Dusty to play him in LF against the next Phils' righty ... if it goes that far. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 2,025
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
I don't think I'm reaching to say that going into the 3rd inning,of a 1 run game as opposed to a 4 run game dramatically effects how the final 7 innings plays out.Not only that, the mind set of the Reds hitter changes.The magnitude of that play is being overlooked imo. Saying it didn't matter and that the no-hitter was destined is something I didn't expect to hear here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 2,025
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
BTW.Sorry for derailing this thread almost completely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
"So Fla Red"
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: South Florida - The Real Humidor
Posts: 4,470
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,013
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
But wait, OCab did all of that, that's right...lets take it out on the whipping boy. How does he "certaintly" cost the team 3 runs on a debatable play?
__________________
"Today was the byproduct of us thinking we can come back from anything." - Joey Votto after blowing a 10-1 lead and holding on for the 12-11 win on 8/25/2010. Last edited by Griffey012; 10-08-2010 at 12:26 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 2,025
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Vancouver, Wa
Posts: 8,220
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
I think this thread proves the biggest problem for fans when you give a day off between every game in the playoffs.....
__________________
“Our team is a team full of fighters. They never panic. We don't necessarily get all the hits we want all the time, but we find a way to win.” – Dusty Baker |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Licking County Settlers
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 6,174
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
No one is blaming the loss on OC, I'm just saying maybe you put your best SS out there and your chances of winning that game increase. It is true that it may not have mattered, but again I'd have liked to have found out. This isn't about one game. That's the reason no one is calling for Rolen and others to be benched, they're the best we've got at those positions and it would be silly to call for them to be benched after one bad performance. As I said before, if OC made that error and he was the best we had it wouldn't bother me nearly as much. You could probably say the same for Volquez, he wasn't the right choice and maybe the game would have been different if Wood had started or maybe they still lose. Again, it would have been nice to find out.
__________________
"three dimes, a one hundred dollar bill and and 87 ones..." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Rally Onion!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 33,227
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
__________________
The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
"So Fla Red"
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: South Florida - The Real Humidor
Posts: 4,470
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
the 1/1/2/1 division series setup is a bad made for TV joke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 2,025
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
I'll put this behind me tomorrow though and will be rooting for OCabb to make some nice plays or get a big hit so your point is valid.I'd love to eat some crow. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,815
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,826
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
RZ loves to pull the trigger on hypothetical moves. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,013
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
Until I see a replay I cannot be convinced the play was "routine." I too was dumbfounded he didn't go to first, but never got a good shot during the broadcast of a replay which showed where the runner was down the line. I believe it was Wilson Valdez who hit the ball, he is a pretty quick guy and that ball was by no means hit hard. My bigger problem between OC and Janish is Gomes vs. Nix...and thankfully Nix is coming out there in game 2 against a tough righty. The bigger issue is in LF. The separation between Gomes and Nix vs a tough righty is much greater than Janish and OC.
__________________
"Today was the byproduct of us thinking we can come back from anything." - Joey Votto after blowing a 10-1 lead and holding on for the 12-11 win on 8/25/2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Licking County Settlers
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 6,174
|
Re: Nix and Hanigan starting game 2, Wood possible to start for game 4
Quote:
__________________
"three dimes, a one hundred dollar bill and and 87 ones..." |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |