![]() |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Socratic Gadfly
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,224
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
Quote:
And remember Elsbury is damaged goods both physically and in his relationship with the Sawks. He will not be a Red Sox next year, and everyone knows it. His trade value is much lower than it has ever been.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Battle Toad Historian
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pyeongtaek, ROK
Posts: 1,644
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
I would be all over an Alonso for Ellsbury deal. Ellsbury and his .350+ OBP and solid glove would be a boon for the Reds lineup/defense.
__________________
A lil more east than most on this board. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,407
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
Ditto. I like power over speed in the corners, but if Alonso could fetch Ellsbury straight up than it's a no-brainer IMO. The key to watch is whether Beltre re-signs with the Sox. If he doesn't, they could move Youk to 3B which would open up a spot for Yonder.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,912
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
Even then, is Alonso enough of an upgrade over Lars Anderson to make it worth it for them?
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,491
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
Quote:
Though the Sox really seem to like Anderson, he was rated much higher last year before he slipped last season. That is a lesson that won't be lost on any one year evaluation of Alonso. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,989
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
Well let's see here it's the AL so the Sox could play both Anderson and Alonso and they need some pop. Also Alonso is a natural fit to knock balls off of the Monster for years to come. I think Boston would want a bit more (maybe an arm like Burton who is undervalued by the Reds and it's fans) because they can based on perception but I think they can see Alonso for what he can be after they coach him up a bit. I'd say it's a very interesting match and one that could get done.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,491
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
Quote:
If Alonso has a full year of really monster production at triple A, I can see him as a real enticing trade chip. Right now, he is not going to bring an Ellsbury or other starting player from the Yankees or the Red Sox. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Socratic Gadfly
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,224
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
Elsbury is no longer a starter for the Red Sox. They are going to trade him. They like Reddick and that other young CF better.
I agree with the evaluation of Alonso, but I think people are overvaluing Elsbury. The Red Sox Alonso alone will not get him, but it won't take much more. Someone like Bray.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
The shine is totally off of Lars Anderson right now... I'd definitely argue that Yonder has more value as a prospect than Lars...
__________________
2010 Mock Draft Selections (picking for Rays) Bryce Brentz Brandon Workman Kris Bryant Matt Lipka Rick Hague |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,928
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
If such a deal came down I would offer Wood before I offer Leake.
__________________
2006 Redzone mock Draftee's- 1(st) Daniel Bard(redsox), 1(st sup)( Jordan Walden (Angels), 2(nd) rd.- Zach Britton(Orioles), 3(rd) Blair Erickson(Cardinals), 3(rd) Tim Norton( Yankees),(cuz its a Tim Hortons thing ![]() Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,491
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
Quote:
In fact, Ellsbury is probably the only sure thing in their unsettled outfield for 2011. Cameron and Drew are old and injury prone. McDonald and Patterson are minor league fill-ins. Ellsbury is the only one who you can count on to be in their outfield if not traded for a proven offensive force such as Adrian Gonzalez. Alonso and Bray will not bring Ellsbury to Cincinnati. The Red Sox are in the most competitive division in baseball and have the financial ability not to trade starters for players with mere potential. Now, they may listen on Joey Votto...but not a prospect like Alonso..and especially not for a suspect like Bray. Last edited by Spitball; 11-28-2010 at 10:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,491
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
Quote:
They do not have to even play that game with position players. They can bring in proven players. Youkilis, Pedroia and Ellsbury are home grown. For the past several years, most positions have been filled by high priced imports. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,652
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
Quote:
Alonso may not be a match for the Sox, why force it? We can just keep him in AAA for insurance and it would be more valuable than trading for Ellsbury, IMO. He'll perform there and retain some value. Or trade him in a package for a better player. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,421
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,328
|
Re: How about Ellsbury
I'm no language expert, but I would assume that was meant to be hyperbole? You're suppose to get a little chuckle over the massive understatement?
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |