![]() |
|
|
#76 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,331
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/player/...eerstats/69814
From 04 to 06 he was playing as well as just about any QB ever has. Looking at his yd/att, TD total (not so much honestly), and TD to INT ratio...he has being trending down ever since. And trending down for Manning still gives you a great QB, but I think we are at the crossroads where the Aaron Rodgers-type QB is passing him by. |
|
|
|
|
|
#77 | |
|
Licking County Settlers
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 6,174
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
Quote:
First year they really had a deep threat since 06 was last year in Garcon and he's nothing too special.
__________________
"three dimes, a one hundred dollar bill and and 87 ones..." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 | |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,331
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Licking County Settlers
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 6,174
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
Harrison left after 06, he was still employed by the colts until 08.
__________________
"three dimes, a one hundred dollar bill and and 87 ones..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,331
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Section 525-Saturdays.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Paris, OH
Posts: 1,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
Quote:
As for QB's right now I think you have to put Brady, Rivers, and Brees ahead of Manning. Vick is a wild card because when he is on he is the hardest in the game to stop. Big Ben won't put up numbers but he finds a way to win. And then you have Matt Ryan who looks to be the up and coming QB star. So right now my list would go 1. Brady 2. Rivers 3. Brees 4. Manning 5. Ben 6. Ryan 7. Vick |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 | |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,331
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
Quote:
Let me introduce another variable into this, and I intend this as a compliment for Manning. If you give Manning solid offensive line protection and a set of decent recievers that he has worked with for a few years...I'd say no one can sit back and pick apart a defense like him. However, most teams out there have a chink or two in their armor, of which a QB has to instinctively make a play. I don't think that is one of Peyton's strong suits. Or maybe I should say, most of the guys I rank above him are better at that than Manning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Mr.Redlegs is my homeboy
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,171
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 | |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,331
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
Quote:
As I wrote earlier, he has been trending down since 06. (Of course down for Manning is still a very good QB). Where do you think Manning is today in regards to his career? In his prime? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
|
Mr.Redlegs is my homeboy
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,171
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
Quote:
I asked if he was entering his downside through the first 8 games this year, and you said yes. I presented evidence to show this was not the case. Manning's stats did not begin to drop until the team lost their starting RB, their #3 RB, their #1 TE, and their #2 or 3 WR. Any of the 8 or 9 QBs that you feel are better than Manning right now would experience the same steep decline in their stats if their team lost that many weapons on offense at one time. As for your questions, I think Manning today, with a healthy supporting cast, is every bit as good as he ever was. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,331
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
I misread your question Eric, or the spirit there of, because Manning's best years were 04 to 06. So he wasn't "entering" the downside early this year, because he was already in it to a degree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
Quote:
Why is Manning regressing when his offensive weapons get hurt while Rivers is surging? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Licking County Settlers
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 6,174
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
He played five games in 07 and played injured for all 15 games of 08. Due to injuries and old age, he was gone after 06.
__________________
"three dimes, a one hundred dollar bill and and 87 ones..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
Mr.Redlegs is my homeboy
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,171
|
Re: 2010 Indianapolis Colts
Quote:
As for your second question A) I don't think Manning is regressing, and B) Rivers didn't lose Gates for the year, he has a much deeper RB and WR group, he knew Jackson was holding out so they coudl prepare and he has faced a much easier schedule than Manning & the Colts have. Plus, the Colts have more wins. If the argument is Rivers vs Manning with the exact same offenses behind them, give me Manning every day and twice on Sunday. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |