RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-26-2010, 07:02 PM   #61
PuffyPig
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,838
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

I'm happy to see him with the Rangers.

I don't want to take the chance (however slim) he ended with the Cards.
PuffyPig is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 12-26-2010, 07:21 PM   #62
Brutus
Et tu, Brutus?
 
Brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 9,097
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

Quote:
Originally Posted by membengal View Post
You are thinking of the Webb that was, not the Webb that is. The top of the rotation Webb is gone. And won't be what you want for the playoffs.

Shoulders like he suffered are a relentless and cruel mistress.
We don't know the Webb that is. No one knows what he'll be, so it's too presumptive to write him off. We do know what he's been, though, and while there's no questioning shoulder injuries often don't turn out well, you don't know yet what's going to happen. But for a one year deal, it's sure worth finding out.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
Brutus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2010, 07:32 PM   #63
PuffyPig
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,838
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutus the Pimp View Post
But for a one year deal, it's sure worth finding out.
That depends, doesn't it, on the price?
PuffyPig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2010, 07:45 PM   #64
Brutus
Et tu, Brutus?
 
Brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 9,097
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

Quote:
Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
That depends, doesn't it, on the price?
Because it's only one season, and the Reds would not have likely spent that money anyhow, I don't feel it does in this case. If it were a case of using that money wisely, sure, but since it doesn't appear they're going to spend it anyhow... I'm not too concerned by the price (since we're not talking $15 million).
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
Brutus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2010, 08:59 PM   #65
TheNext44
Socratic Gadfly
 
TheNext44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,224
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutus the Pimp View Post
Because it's only one season, and the Reds would not have likely spent that money anyhow, I don't feel it does in this case. If it were a case of using that money wisely, sure, but since it doesn't appear they're going to spend it anyhow... I'm not too concerned by the price (since we're not talking $15 million).
The Reds still need a LF and some bench help. I am pretty sure they aren't done.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein
TheNext44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2010, 09:40 PM   #66
Brutus
Et tu, Brutus?
 
Brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 9,097
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNext44 View Post
The Reds still need a LF and some bench help. I am pretty sure they aren't done.
I think that. You think that. But do the Reds think that?

Nothing they've said or done thus far indicates they're too concerned about it. If Scott Podsednik is the answer, I'll feel Taveras'd.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
Brutus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2010, 07:45 AM   #67
membengal
Member
 
membengal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 8,403
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

To be clear, brutus, I really very much wanted them to find a hammer for the top of the rotation this off-season (see the Grienke thread) and was advocating dealing from the pitching depth to do so (I think I pimped two of three of Volquez/Bailey/Leake to get it theoretically done as a starting point). But I want the person brought in to be a no questions asked TOR, not an embalmed in questions recovery project. This team really doesn't have the room to carry such a project at this point in the rotation. And Webb in the bullpen to see what he has doesn't fill the playoff need you mention.

So, no, Webb looked like an awkward target to me. At this point, having missed on Grienke, it looks like the die is cast to hoping that Volquez recaptures his pre-TJ form fully and that Cueto continues to improve while Wood is what he looked like last year and Bailey and/or Leake finds their form. That all could happen in some form or another, but it is a risk, that's for sure. Because any of a number of those hopes could come up short.
membengal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2010, 10:50 AM   #68
_Sir_Charles_
2013 NL MVP and WS MVP
 
_Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,658
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNext44 View Post
The Reds still need a LF and some bench help. I am pretty sure they aren't done.
I know most of the fans feel this way, but everything I've read leads me to believe that the Reds think Gomes IS the full-time answer to leftfield. And as for the bench...we've got an awful lot of rooks sitting down there in L'ville waiting for a shot. I don't see the bench as much of a concern. The only other "hole" to be filled is shortstop according to the masses. But with the cupboard bare...I do believe Paul will get his first full-season opportunity.

I think they're done.
__________________
“If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant’s life, she will choose to save the infant’s life without even considering if there is a man on base.” —Dave Barry
_Sir_Charles_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2010, 10:56 AM   #69
PuffyPig
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,838
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Sir_Charles_ View Post
I know most of the fans feel this way, but everything I've read leads me to believe that the Reds think Gomes IS the full-time answer to leftfield.


Does the fact they are rumoured to be looking at Posdesnik mean maybe they aren't?
PuffyPig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2010, 11:18 AM   #70
mth123
The Big Dog
 
mth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,915
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

Sounds like Webb's deal is $3 Million plus incentives. That's about what the Reds have left. I'd rather not spend it on such a question mark.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS
mth123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2010, 12:45 PM   #71
The Voice of IH
Lets Go 'Bird' Hunting
 
The Voice of IH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The University of Akron
Posts: 1,108
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

Please, keep these discussions segregated. they are different issues.

Webb would not have been a fit, we don't need pitching next season. Stick with the young guns. Stay the course.
__________________
Hey Sparky! Indian Hill English teachers taught me everything I know!

Numbers behind the Debate: Small Ball vs. Long Ball
The Voice of IH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2010, 03:09 PM   #72
RedsManRick
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
 
RedsManRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,988
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

Yet another example of Jocketty keeping his cards close. Judging Jocketty's activity based on what rumors get out is a recipe for perennially underestimating his efforts. As with this, we may not always come out on top, but we shouldn't let that confuse us in to thinking Jocketty isn't continually exploring opportunities.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.
RedsManRick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2010, 05:19 PM   #73
Brutus
Et tu, Brutus?
 
Brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 9,097
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

Quote:
Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
Sounds like Webb's deal is $3 Million plus incentives. That's about what the Reds have left. I'd rather not spend it on such a question mark.
My question would be this:

Do you feel there's any chance of spending the remaining money (be it $3 million or what have you) on anyone left out there that isn't a question mark? With that amount, my instinct is to say anyone Cincinnati signs/trades for is likely not going to be a sure thing.

Seems Webb could have brought by far the most potential, and $3 million is a low risk and awfully high reward.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
Brutus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2010, 08:05 PM   #74
mth123
The Big Dog
 
mth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,915
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutus the Pimp View Post
My question would be this:

Do you feel there's any chance of spending the remaining money (be it $3 million or what have you) on anyone left out there that isn't a question mark? With that amount, my instinct is to say anyone Cincinnati signs/trades for is likely not going to be a sure thing.

Seems Webb could have brought by far the most potential, and $3 million is a low risk and awfully high reward.
There are performance questions and there are health questions. No guarantees to a pitcher with a bad shoulder.

I think the after Christmas bargain season is about to begin. Once Pavano, Beltre and Soriano sign, the prices will fall. $3 or $4 Million might get Johnny Damon. Surely it could get Fred Lewis plus something else. Dump a Burton and a Gomes in a deal and the team could take a $6 Million guy back. Save it for the deadline when $3 Million pays for a $9 Million talent. All better than frittering it away on a bad shoulder.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS
mth123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2010, 08:10 PM   #75
edabbs44
Box of Frogs
 
edabbs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,948
Re: Diamondbacks have no plans to bring back Webb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutus the Pimp View Post
My question would be this:

Do you feel there's any chance of spending the remaining money (be it $3 million or what have you) on anyone left out there that isn't a question mark? With that amount, my instinct is to say anyone Cincinnati signs/trades for is likely not going to be a sure thing.

Seems Webb could have brought by far the most potential, and $3 million is a low risk and awfully high reward.
That $3MM might be better used in July.
edabbs44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25