![]() |
|
|
#121 |
|
The Future is Now
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,883
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
90 wins. Three less than the Brewers.
__________________
2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9 2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4 2013 Attendance Record: 1-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#122 |
|
Reds 5:11
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 635
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
89 wins
__________________
You cannot defeat an ignorant man in an argument! -William Gibbs McAdoo Though many of us here are sure trying
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
Please come again
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
87
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
#124 |
|
Playoffs
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,233
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
87 wins.
If the starting pitching was healthy, then I'd have been ready to hit 90. But I'm worried about the current injury situation and this organization's tendency for minor injuries to drag on.
__________________
Barry Larkin - HOF, 2012 Put an end to the Lost Decade. |
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,007
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
89 wins
|
|
|
|
|
|
#126 |
|
Oy Vey!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,248
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
88 wins
|
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Smells Like Teen Spirit
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,486
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
87 wins
|
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 928
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
87
The key to winning over 90 is having one of Volquez, Bailey or Cueto becoming a dominant pitcher. All three are behind schedule. |
|
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Beer is good!!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,117
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
90 wins
Need a healthy Rolen and the pitching staff to meet expectations.
__________________
"Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard |
|
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Will post for food
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,088
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
86-76
A minor step back |
|
|
|
|
|
#131 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,242
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
I was negative for the first time last year.
Karma......77 wins |
|
|
|
|
|
#132 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 3,340
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
What about the Reds depth though? Shouldn't that make up for the injuries?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
Oy Vey!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,248
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,352
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
92 Wins
__________________
"Now that's a real shame when folks be throwin' away a perfectly good white boy like that." |
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: 2011 - Gonelong's 10th annual Season Ws prediction thread .
94 baby!!!
![]() Gimme some of that Duhsty KOOL AID!!!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |