![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,628
|
Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
It's no secret that thus far, Leake has pitched better than Volquez has. That's not to say it will continue, but there's no doubt that Leake has control that is light years ahead of Volquez. Given that Bailey and Cueto are rehabbing right now and will be back before long, what happens? We know that LeCure's spot will be taken by 1 of them. But what about the other? Do you send Leake to 3a? Do you put Volquez in the bullpen? Volquez has walked almost as many batters as the rest of the rotation combined. He has also given up 6 jacks, which is a staggering and concerning number. He is a K machine, however.
What do you think should happen and what do you think will happen? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,815
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
When Cueto and Bailey come back I'd send Maloney and Leake to Louisville and LeCure to the bullpen.
I guess we'll have to wait and see. . Last edited by Ron Madden; 04-17-2011 at 11:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,132
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
Going to a game Volquez pitches is like watching a concert with a really crap opening act.
I'm kinda sick of it. It's clearly a head issue for him at this point (and, really, it's been head issues for him since his Texas days), and if he can't sort it out, I don't want him on the ballclub costing the the team games.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,121
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
History tells me that most of this will be worked out by fate.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,052
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
When Bailey and Cueto return, my rotation would be Cueto, Bailey, Arroyo, Wood, and either of Leake or LeCure, with the other in the bullpen. I send Maloney back down and try to make a deal for Volquez. I also make it the first priority for 2012 to prepare Chapman to become a member of the rotation. In a way, I think it's too early to make a decision about Volquez, and perhaps his problems are exacerbated by the surgery, but the problems look very much like those that have plagued him throughout all of his career except for the first half of his first season with us: command issues, and there's very little reason to believe they will get better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Lime in da Coconut
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Rainelle, WV
Posts: 7,712
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
Quote:
It's pretty obvious the kid has a mental block in the first inning this year, but he hasn't been around long enough (big early inning pitch counts) for anyone to know if he will pitch OK late in a game. So, those who expect him to be the ace will be disappointed.
__________________
www.ris-news.com "The price of seeking to force our beliefs on others is that someday they might force their beliefs on us." Mario Cuomo "You only have to bat a thousand in two things; flying and heart transplants. Everything else you can go 4-for-5." -Beano Cook |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,917
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
When I see Volquez pitch, all I can think of is how many of us kept telling ourselves that EE would eventually learn how to throw the ball to 1B.
Edinson definitely has talent; his arm is quite live. But I find it interesting that we treat control like something that be improved pretty easily -- like it's just a matter of time. We certainly treat it differently than stuff. Nobody expects Mike Leake to start striking out a guy an inning. Very few guys go from having poor control to having good control. As for the rotation; I think Maloney and Leake head to Louisville and LeCure takes over the long relief role.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,714
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
Unless Volquez gets his 1st inning woes straightened out in the next couple of starts you have to either send to the bullpen or to AAA if he has options left. You can't let him continue to put his team in the hole every game. It puts too much pressure on the entire team to come from behind. Not to mention that it will slowly burn out a bullpen because you having to take him out an inning or two earlier than you would have he had got off to a good start. That loss yesterday was all on him. If he comes out the gate well the Reds win that game easily. You can't keep giving away games like that and expect to make the playoffs.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,818
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,617
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
Arroyo, Cueto, Wood, Leake, Bailey. LeCure has done nothing but impress me in his brief stint in the majors and deserves the chance to be the "next man up." I send Volquez down to A ball, yes A ball.
Edinson's issues aren't a talent issue, more a mental and preparedness issue. You can't keep running him out there when he gets hammered in the 1st inning. You can't have him average a ~ 3 run hole after the 1st inning. I send him down to A ball, with a set of rules, and tell him he has to earn his way back to the bigs. That means coming prepared to start every game. That means harnessing his control and throwing strikes. That means eliminating mental lapses. That means heading into the 1st inning ready to pitch. As it is right now that he has a mental block in that first inning. Wonder if it had anything to do with his poor playoff performance (Ankiel thinking). Until he gets that straightened out he does the Reds little good. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
Quote:
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
Quote:
Coming prepared? Unless the coaching staff thinks he's not putting work in to be prepared, they are just as responsible at finding a preparation method that puts him in an advantageous spot.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life. ---Joe Posnanski |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,354
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
Quote:
His 1st inning numbers are horrendous as far as letting runs in. http://www.baseball-reference.com/pl...ear=Career&t=p As for Leake, he impresses me not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,617
|
Re: Leake vs. Volquez & The Starting Rotation
Quote:
I am just not in the camp of saying "everything is fine" or "its an outlier" or "things will average out". Fact of the matter is right now its looking like Edinson's success was the outlier. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |