![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,036
|
Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
What say you? I say absolutely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,408
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
Yep. He can be my CF for the next 5-6 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,036
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
We went 6/51 on Bruce, what do you think..............6/40-45 on Stubbs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,408
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 9,084
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
I think so. He'll be arbitration eligible after next season, so this offseason it might be worth giving a look.
Worst-case scenario, you do it after next year and avoid arb. But historically, you get a more favorable discount if you do it the year prior.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,448
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
Now is the time to lock him down. He can stay here for a long, long time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Lime in da Coconut
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Rainelle, WV
Posts: 7,727
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
Yes! He's really going to improve and be a star. Mark it down. I'd go 5/30.
__________________
www.ris-news.com "The price of seeking to force our beliefs on others is that someday they might force their beliefs on us." Mario Cuomo "You only have to bat a thousand in two things; flying and heart transplants. Everything else you can go 4-for-5." -Beano Cook |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
What Me Worry?
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 26,430
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
What's the hurry? I'd wait till after next season.
__________________
"panic" only comes from having real expectations |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
One and a half men
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,487
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
Maybe through his arb years, but as an older prospect his status as an elite defender in CF should decline post arb, and he's unlikely to improve as a hitter (ie. he's reached his potential).
Believe me, I have been as big a Stubbs supporter as anyone, but he would ideally be a trade candidate before free agency hits just because I don't think he's a long term great bet to be worth the substantial contract required. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Puffy's Daddy
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 20,422
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
Quote:
I guess it depends on everyone's definition of long term, though. I would be fine with the Reds buying out his arbitration years and ok with including 1 year of F.A. (although it could get more costly). I don't think it makes sense to sign him to a real long term deal, like 6+ years. You could possibly be overpaying by then.
__________________
'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.' -Snoop on his retirement Your Mom is happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,408
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
Just some perspective as I think Stubbs is sometimes over shadowed.
In 2010, he had a WAR of 3.4. The 3 OF ranked directly above him were BJ Upton, Corey Hart, and Andrew McCutchon. The 3 OF ranked directly below him were Justin Upton, Hunter Pence, and Ben Zobrist. In 2011, he is on pace for a WAR of 4.7. Last edited by kaldaniels; 05-14-2011 at 10:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,579
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
It looks to me like he's improving as a hitter. Really solidifying things with an opposite field and up the middle approach much of the time. Great stolen base % so far too. I've been surprised at how well he's settled into the leadoff spot.
If he can maintain consistency, he's an all star CF. And, to be honest, to me he looks like a better all around player than Bruce right now. Let the year play out, and then see what kind of multiyear deal makes sense.
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,408
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 9,084
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
Leverage.
The sooner you do it before arbitration the more, typically, you save long term.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,046
|
Re: Should the Reds start to think LTC for Stubbs?
Stubbs is terrific.
I just wish Dusty would play Freddie Lewis more in left field. And I'd prefer Lewis as a leadoff guy. Lewis, Phillips, Votto, Rolen, Bruce, Stubbs, Catcher, Janish works for me. Drew is a very good clutch hitter and hitting him fifth or sixth would allow him to knock in more runs. In any event, by all means they should sign him for a few years. He is a real talent. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |