![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 142
|
Logan Ondrusek
Obviously is tired out and shouldnt be put in games like tonight. Not a dusty basher but bad move there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 365
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
Chapman has pitched poorly recently, and so has Arredondo. I can't blame him.
Oh, wait...you mean those guys are the two hottest pitchers in the 'pen and neither was used yet? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
All work and no play.....
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 6,847
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
Dusty, Dusty, Dusty...............
Where would this team be without him. FIRST?
__________________
"I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic. "Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 365
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 104
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
I have NEVER been big on Ondrusek. You can show me all the stats you want, blah blah...I don't care. I just have always thought he "looked" lucky when he would get through an inning. He has never looked "solid" (I don't really know any other way to put it). I think of him on the same level as someone like Fisher.
I'm w/most everyone else. WHY not have Chapman up and throwing? That way, when/if Ondrusek gives up a hit, you stop the bleeding right then and right there. Put Chapman in. More likely than not, inning saved and we go to the 11th. I have NEVER said anything negative about Dusty til now. I have listened to viewpoints from both sides (pro/con) and I have watched his "managerial decisions" w/my own 2 eyes all yr. long. And there is just NO other way to put it; DUSTY HAS GOT TO FREAKIN' GO! He SUCKS. Yes, I know Hanigan should have made the catch. But, the damn game should have NEVER gotten to that point in the 1st place!!! Pathetic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 263
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
When they said Logan was coming in the game, I said oh well it's over. He has blown every game he has been in with the game tied in the last month or two but Baker just keeps on using him. There was no reason why Chapman should not have been in no later than after the first hit. IMO he should have started the inning. BUT, if the Reds could score a runner from third with less than 2 outs the game would never have been in a tenth inning. We win in 9.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elida
Posts: 90
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
where was LeClure? He has pitched well. Is he in Dusty's doghouse?
__________________
Reds fan forever! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dayton
Posts: 297
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
It's as if Dusty is trying to make a point to Walt that he just doesn't have enough talent.
"I'm going to put Andrusek In here". Anyone playing that game like there was no tommorow would have gone with Chapman to start the inning and at the very least would have had Chapman ready to go at first sign of trouble. It's like Dusty just gave up. Players take on the personality of the manager and that is what this organization can look forward to as long as the turd is managing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Nothern Kentucky
Posts: 261
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Winning the Human Race
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Titletown, FL
Posts: 3,808
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
Quote:
Going to him in the first place was questionable. Leaving him in there when it was painfully obvious he had absolutely nothing was indefensible.
__________________
Founder and Ruling Elite of the Derrick Robinson Fan Club. Limited amount of memberships available. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
Yeah his numbers look a lot better than I would think they would. I guess it's just his turn though. Coco blew some games, then Masset took over, and now Ondrusek is stepping up.
I don't know what other options we really had that inning other than Coco. Ondrusek gave up a first pitch single, then the next guy was on in what, 3/4 pitches? That inning got away really fast, but yeah I agree we should have had someone else warming before the inning just as a precaution. Also, for a guy that has had a mid 90s fastball, he really seems to throw a lot of mid 80s thigh high ducks. I dunno if it's a changeup or what offspeed pitch it is, but when you have a fastball like that I have no idea why it isn't used more. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
I don't want to grow up
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 532
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
Quote:
/sarcasm
__________________
The older I get - the better I was and yes - I hate the Cardinals (Reds fan since 1958) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Retro-Gamer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,631
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Old Red Guard Reject
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,419
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
I really thought once Ondrusek got in trouble he would've brought Chapman in. Actually, like the rest of you, I question why Chapman wasn't used to start the inning. Cueto pitched a complete game the day before meaning everyone should have been available and Dusty chooses....Ondrusek?
__________________
If you ain't first, you're last! - Ricky Bobby |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 501
|
Re: Logan Ondrusek
I think it is odd that the two guys who were put in to finish a 7-2 game were the same two guys put into a 3-3 game. Especially since Bray's 2/3 of an inning is the only other relief work since Friday.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |