![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lexington
Posts: 4,952
|
Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
...according to Bryan Price, Says at the least, Aroldis will be looked at as a starter at some point.
http://cincinnati.reds.mlb.com/news/...k_cin&c_id=cin |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Brett William Moore
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crescent Springs KY
Posts: 3,511
|
Re: Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
How many innings could he be expected to give us in 2012? I believe his high is ~109 IP. Would 140 innings be reasonable for 2012? then maybe 165-170 in 2013 and 190-200 by 2014.
__________________
. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Will post for food
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,099
|
Re: Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
Chapman had a wasted year with this organization.
He threw less innings than last year and they still don't know what they are going to do with him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,661
|
Re: Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,770
|
Re: Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
Chapman threw 125 in a season while in Cuba. That would mean he should be ideally safe to throw about 155 in a season.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,055
|
Re: Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
I'd start the stretching out process right now. This is, IMO, about the best news for 2012 we could hear; the only thing comparable would be that Votto had decided to move to LF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,770
|
Re: Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
What about Votto signing an extension for about 18M per for 3 additional years to what he has now? I think that would be better than either. Though I do really like both of the other ideas too.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Party like it's 1990
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,328
|
Re: Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
I would sure as heck hope so. Pitching him out of the 'pen is a complete waste of his talents. Also, his control problems won't be as magnified as a starter compared to pitching to just a few batters in relief when every walk (or hit or out) is crucial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,826
|
Re: Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
Not sure how we can believe this after watching Volquez in 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Brett William Moore
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crescent Springs KY
Posts: 3,511
|
Re: Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
Quote:
Chapman to the rotation. Votto signs an extension and moves to LF. Grandal, Sappelt & change get traded for a #2 starter. I win the lottery.
__________________
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Party like it's 1990
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,328
|
Re: Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
Quote:
Ahhh, imagine the possibilities for the rotation if Walt trades for a top-of-rotation starter to go along with Cueto, Leake, Chapman and Arroyo. (To get a TOR starter in a trade, the Reds might have to include both Bailey and Volquez in the deal.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Section 525-Saturdays.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Paris, OH
Posts: 1,982
|
Quote:
Sent from my SGH-I897 using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,268
|
Re: Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
Good news!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Rally Onion!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 33,227
|
Re: Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
Quote:
__________________
The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
OOOOH YEEEAHHHH!!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 577
|
Re: Chapman could be in the 2012 rotation...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |