![]() |
|
|
#286 | |
|
Yay!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,262
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#287 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 532
|
Re: College Football Realignment
|
|
|
|
|
|
#288 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,865
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
![]() Really I thought the SEC would pursue them. Dallas is a huge market to be in and they would compliment Tex A&M pretty well.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#289 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,062
|
Re: College Football Realignment
If Missouri says no and they don't have a 16th team already lined up they still might.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#290 | |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
The only way I see 16 team conferences becoming an across the board thing is if the NCAA plans playoffs, which of course will never happen.
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#291 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cincinnati USA
Posts: 3,320
|
Re: College Football Realignment
And that's barely half of their moves in the past 15 years or so. They've also been in (at least) the SWAC and WAC since the mid-90s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#292 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: College Football Realignment
They spent a few seasons in C-USA too.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#293 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cincinnati USA
Posts: 3,320
|
Re: College Football Realignment
|
|
|
|
|
|
#294 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,127
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Some days I miss the rep system.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#295 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 739
|
Re: College Football Realignment
We are all going to have to buy guides to find out what schools play in what conference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#296 | |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,135
|
Re: College Football Realignment
I admit it -- there was about a 15 second window where I allowed myself to dream, and then reality came back and I remembered that I went to a school that's 17th banana in the athletics world. But, this was so cool to read today:
http://espn.go.com/college-sports/st...en-invite-most Quote:
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#297 | |
|
Puffy 3:16
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Panama City Beach
Posts: 13,669
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
__________________
"I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum... and I'm all out of bubble gum." - - Rowdy Roddy Piper "It takes a big man to admit when he is wrong. I am not a big man" - - Fletch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#298 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
Do you think the other Big 12 teams would rather travel to New Orleans, Louisville, or Morgantown? Not to mention with media market New Orleans is a better fit. Tulane is a wildcard, but one that could work. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#299 |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,578
|
Re: College Football Realignment
This isn't asked out of meanness... Is there any conference that really wants WVU outside of the big east who must be desparate to keep them?
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
#300 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
The reason though is I don't see any other possibility for the SEC: Teams that likely will be blocked by other members: Florida State (ACC) Georgia Tech (ACC) Clemson (ACC) Louisville (Big East) Team that makes sense but sold its soul (as Slyder put it) and even then has to deal with a 20 million buyout: Virginia Tech (ACC) Which leaves WVU, Cincinnati, and South Florida being the teams making the most geographical sense. UC borders on Kentucky, among other issues. South Florida would be interesting as it would bring Miami, but would UF vote for it? That leaves WVU who would likely be no 15. The SEC could stay at 15 and go with a 3 pod system as Slyder mentioned, but if they go 16, another wildcard I would throw out is NC State. It would put the SEC into North Carolina and tap into the Raleigh-Durham/Charlotte market. NC State is the redheaded stepchild of the Carolina schools, but it would likely take convincing to get them to leave. It would give them a solid rivalry with South Carolina as well. Of course, you have to hope they would bite and the exit fee comes up again. Once past WVU, its a guessing game. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |