![]() |
|
|
#691 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 736
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
#692 |
|
A Little to the Left
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bexley, OH
Posts: 7,417
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
... right which is why I said "since Marvin Lewis was hired".
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. --Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
|
#693 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 110
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
Sorry to go back a few pages. I definitely agree we swindled the Raiders, but I'll take a stab at forming an argument that justifies the trade. So, at his worst, Carson is about a league average QB. At his best, he might be in the top 7 (this # is completely arbitrary). First off, many league average QBs are drafted in the 1st round. The cream of the crop QBs go in the first 10 picks. Obviously there are diamonds in the rough (rodgers), but usually late 1st round qbs are hit or miss. This year, their record already puts them in position to have a mid-late 1st round pick. With Carson, you are getting a guarantee. His QB rating is relatively stable and unlike draft picks, you know what kind of production you're getting. It's not going to be top 5, or top 10, but it's average, and possibly better. They now have a decent qb that is fairly consistent under center for the next 4 years. So, in that respect, he might be worth a 1st rounder and a second rounder. They can win now, avoid the gamble associated with the draft and solidify qb for the next few years, and maybe brighten the day of a few bengals fans.
|
|
|
|
|
#694 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 736
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
#695 |
|
Will post for food
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,090
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
I'm sure this has been brought up before but does anyone know of a Bengals message board with semi-intelligent discussion and less of the stupid banners and avatars?
What is it about NFL message boards? Is there something in the demographic that screams, "I have to have a custom designed banner that takes up half the computer screen"? I just want a RedsZone-like discussion on the Bengals. Like this thread, but just more detail. |
|
|
|
|
#696 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 10,702
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#697 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
Bengalszone is decent. Not as civil as this board, but some good discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
#698 | |
|
Churlish
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,664
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
He got fed up with Mike Brown, and he asked to be traded. Brown refused, so rather than take the money and go through the motions, he quit.
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful |
|
|
|
|
|
#699 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
And it's not as if Carson exactly took a huge risk here. He admittedly already had 80 million in the bank. If he never took another snap he was already rich enough to keep his great grandkids from ever having to work. A lot of people have questioned Carson's will to win over the years, through his quotes and through his demeanor on the sidelines, etc. To me this is just another example of that. Rather than dig in and be a part of the solution, he simply gave up and went home. But I'd love to run into him some day and thank him so much for making The Bengals a much better team without him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#700 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
#701 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,242
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#702 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,242
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
I was playing Madden 2007 the past few nights and I realized in just 4 years there are only a few Bengals left from that team. Geathers, Whitworth, frostee, and Williams is all I could remember. Pollack, Thurman, Tab Perry, Chris Perry, rudi, housh, braham, Dexter Jackson, shayne, Tory James, deltha, John Thornton, chris Henry, Brian Simmons, justin smith, stinko, and Carson all out of football, on other teams, or unfortunately deceased.
|
|
|
|
|
#703 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 7,943
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
I'm sure that all of you realize that if Campbell had broken that collar bone three days later Little Mikey wouldn't have gotten anything at all for Palmer.
Rem
__________________
"For Reds fans, by Reds fans" Learn it, love it, live it. |
|
|
|
|
#704 |
|
A Little to the Left
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bexley, OH
Posts: 7,417
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
Maybe, maybe not. Seattle was offering 2 2nd rounders. Maybe Marvin convinces him to pull the trigger on a different deal, maybe he doesn't. Doesn't really matter in the end, the deal got done. Someone was desperate enough to meet Mike's (ridiculously inflated) price.
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. --Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
|
#705 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
I was fine keeping him till then because there would be a bigger market to compete for him. Sure we lucked out with Oakland becoming extremely desperate to win this year, but that's kinda how these kinda deals work. The alternative was dumping him for a 2nd/3rd or something along those lines just to get rid of him. That was obviously not the right thing to do. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |