![]() |
|
|
#346 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Missouri in the SEC would be a tremendous disappointment.
That's expansion for expansions sake.
__________________
Go Gators! Last edited by KronoRed; 10-18-2011 at 02:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#347 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,062
|
Re: College Football Realignment
It's why I believe ESPN is behind most of this. They're trying to pedal off an inferior product (Missery) on CBS while they try and horde the ones that actually draw for themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#348 |
|
Yay!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,261
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Sure, CBS still has the #1 SEC game of the week. But you realize that ESPN is in the middle of paying $2 billion to the SEC for broadcast rights. If anything, this means Missouri will actually be on ESPN more.
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done. |
|
|
|
|
|
#349 |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: College Football Realignment
|
|
|
|
|
|
#350 |
|
Ex-tixe
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Just past Mars
Posts: 4,470
|
Re: College Football Realignment
One thing we've learned from this is to never put a number in a conference name. Or a location.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#351 |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Just curious, but does anyone think Pitino shooting his mouth off cost Louisville into getting into the Big 12? I read where Big 12 officials are stressing unity and with Pitino making some very divisive comments and WVU being a worse fit geographically if it had any bearing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#352 | |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,569
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
Given some of the nonsensical geographical atrocities that seem to be about to happen, maybe conferences should be named after famous clowns. The draw of college football to me is the tradition and a huge part of that is the rivalries many of which are primarily driven by geography. How the heck does the NCAA sell Boise St vs Rutgers? This realignment stuff is really making it very hard for me to pretend that college football really is still more pagentry than paycheck.
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#353 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,062
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Time to raise this thread back up. Greg Swaim has spoken to "contacts" that the Big 12 has had conversations with Florida State, Clemson, BYU, and Louisville to get to 14. I don't know how true this is but I must admit short of ND joining this is probably the BEST case to get to 14. And what a way to go from the brink of extinction to competing for the BEST football in the nation!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#354 | |
|
On the brink
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: is everything
Posts: 2,488
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
__________________
How do we know he's not Mel Torme? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#355 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
If the scenario did happen (highly doubtful), then the Big 12 should look into a four pod system if they could add two more schools. I'll throw in Tulsa and Tulane although there are probably better options: Big 12 East: WVU Clemson Florida State Louisville Big 12 Central: Kansas Oklahoma Oklahoma State Kansas State Big 12 Texas: Texas Texas Tech TCU Baylor Big 12 West: Tulane Tulsa BYU Iowa State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#356 |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Since Slyder just brought this back up, curious if you're opinion has changed or not given the success in basketball. I am actually starting to warm up to Missouri.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#357 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2
|
Re: Here we go again...
![]() The ACC remains solid at 14. But there have been hints that expansion to 16 could still be an option. Notre Dame and UConn remain the top options. Should Notre Dame make clear they would never join the ACC, then Uconn and Rutgers could be brought in at some point. As of 10/5/11, The ACC is in waiting mode. The future of the Big East (should they lose schools to the Big 12, or TCU to MWC) will dictate the future of Notre Dame. With today’s announcement that Notre Dame will join Hockey East, it does add some speculation that if the Big East were to fall and Notre Dame were to join an all-sports conference, that the ACC could be the pick over the Big Ten. It is believed that if the ACC can get Notre Dame, they would bring in UConn for the #16 school, putting the final blow to the Big East with the ACC fully taking over the northeast region. |
|
|
|
|
|
#358 | |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
I still believe that if the Big10+2 expands again they will call Missouri who will immediately bolt.
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#359 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,062
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Memphis joins the Big East. I have heard both 2012 and 2013 for them. It is believed by some they will make the jump in 12 to replace WVU when an agreement is announced. I still think there is a good low risk/high reward program in CUSA that is actually in an area to GROW rather than just increase the number of people who dont care about them. Thats ECU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#360 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: College Football Realignment
http://www.dailymail.com/News/breakingnews/201202090205
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |