RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-27-2011, 08:17 PM   #181
izzy's dad
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: South Charleston, Ohio
Posts: 413
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

Taylor Mays and Robert Sands are super athletes... not super football players. C.J. Spiller is a freak athlete, but is a complete bum on the football field.

This team needs a difference maker in the secondary, Reggie Nelson is pretty close, but game changer he is not. The Defensive line has two game changers in Dunlap, and Atkins, the linebackers are solid, but our secondary has been poor at best. With Leon Hall and without.

All of that negativity aside, I am pumped about the next decade with Dunlap, Atkins, Green, and Dalton. The Bengals can do some real damage come April with two first round picks and a second round pick. I would love to have a corner/safety, and Lamar Miller (running back out of the University of Miami) in the first, and a guard to replace the human turnstile Livings in the second. Most mocks I have seen, have us taking Janoris Jenkins and Lamar Miller in the first and Cordy Glenn in the second. I'll take that.
izzy's dad is offline  
Turn Off Ads?
Old 11-27-2011, 08:34 PM   #182
Todd Gack
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,638
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by izzy's dad View Post
Taylor Mays and Robert Sands are super athletes... not super football players. C.J. Spiller is a freak athlete, but is a complete bum on the football field.

This team needs a difference maker in the secondary, Reggie Nelson is pretty close, but game changer he is not. The Defensive line has two game changers in Dunlap, and Atkins, the linebackers are solid, but our secondary has been poor at best. With Leon Hall and without.

All of that negativity aside, I am pumped about the next decade with Dunlap, Atkins, Green, and Dalton. The Bengals can do some real damage come April with two first round picks and a second round pick. I would love to have a corner/safety, and Lamar Miller (running back out of the University of Miami) in the first, and a guard to replace the human turnstile Livings in the second. Most mocks I have seen, have us taking Janoris Jenkins and Lamar Miller in the first and Cordy Glenn in the second. I'll take that.
1). Reggie Nelson still gives up dumb plays most games. He was cut by Jacksonville for a reason and he'll never be accused of being an intelligent guy.

2). Lamar Miller isn't coming out and if he does, then it'll be a huge mistake to draft him in the first or second round. He's soft and injury prone. not exactly a set of attributes you want out of a RB.
Todd Gack is offline  
Old 11-27-2011, 08:36 PM   #183
Todd Gack
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,638
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohayou View Post
Receivers are a dime a dozen.

I'm done arguing about Mays. Until he actually starts, don't bother telling me what he can and cannot do.
You'll be waiting a while unless someone gets injured. then we'll find out real quick just how much of a liability he is in the secondary.
Todd Gack is offline  
Old 11-27-2011, 08:39 PM   #184
Ohayou
Member
 
Ohayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 746
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

If only Dunlap could stay healthy for a full season...
Ohayou is offline  
Old 11-27-2011, 09:09 PM   #185
izzy's dad
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: South Charleston, Ohio
Posts: 413
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

I agree that Nelson has been guilty of some head scratchers, and is out of position too often, but he has been the only guy we have been able to count on to make a play in the secondary. I wasn't saying he is elite, only that he is our best playmaker.

If Lamar Miller isn't a good idea, what about Monte Ball? Either way we need a running back, I really don't see Benson on this team next year. What would you go with?
izzy's dad is offline  
Old 11-27-2011, 09:31 PM   #186
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 31,094
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohayou View Post
Receivers are a dime a dozen.

I'm done arguing about Mays. Until he actually starts, don't bother telling me what he can and cannot do.
He has been in the NFL for two seasons. He has played in 20 games. He hasn't started since week 10 of last season, but has played in most games since then. I think that both teams he has played for, as well as the scouts who talked about his inability to run laterally, know a lot more than we as fans do. If he were that good, he would be on the field a lot more often than he is.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline  
Old 11-27-2011, 09:48 PM   #187
Todd Gack
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,638
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by izzy's dad View Post
I agree that Nelson has been guilty of some head scratchers, and is out of position too often, but he has been the only guy we have been able to count on to make a play in the secondary. I wasn't saying he is elite, only that he is our best playmaker.

If Lamar Miller isn't a good idea, what about Monte Ball? Either way we need a running back, I really don't see Benson on this team next year. What would you go with?
I've always liked Cyrus Gray at TAMU, but I'm now sure how he transitions to the NFL. I haven't look at any mocks so I don't know where or who anyone is projecting to be Top 10 picks outside of the QB's.
Todd Gack is offline  
Old 11-27-2011, 11:05 PM   #188
izzy's dad
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: South Charleston, Ohio
Posts: 413
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

Try Walterfootball.com. They have the first three rounds, and they update it every week. Although I have seen them make some pretty weird predictions at times. I get all sorts of geeked up for the draft, and with two picks on the first night I will be off the wall excited.

The Bengals have their QB, WR although I would like them to add some depth, defensive line is superb, but our secondary needs help in the worst sort of way. An uprade at either guard spot is priority too. Our running back situation isn't horrible, but I would trade our earliest first rounder and our second rounder, possibly more to land Trent Richardson. Won't happen, but it is a nice thought.
izzy's dad is offline  
Old 11-28-2011, 05:14 AM   #189
GAC
What Me Worry?
 
GAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 26,430
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stray View Post
I wonder what the Browns plan to do at QB for the future. It's his 2nd year and McCoy hasn't exactly taken big strides forward or anything.
They have to give him the weapons. He's thrown for almost 2,200 yds this year so far (200 yds/game), and done so with mediocre receivers and really no down field threat. Massaquoi has been hurt, in and out, and after that who do we have at WR other then rookie Little (who I think is gonna be a good one)?

The biggest thing that has hurt this team this year - and I didn't expect much with a new head coach, coaching staff, and trying to implement a new offensive scheme - has been injuries. We lost two starters on the O-line almost right off the bat. That hurts. Not only have they not been able to give McCoy protection, but it has badly hampered the running game to the point that our #1 and #2 RBs also got hurt. We just got Hillis back yesterday. He's gone at season's end IMO. I certainly hope they don't give him a huge contract. His being out 6 games with injury could hamper that though.

The only good thing with this team this year, which is playing a lot of youngsters, has been the defense.

It's going to be an interesting draft this year for the Browns. But I certainly can't fault McCoy, looking at what he has had to work with this year.

But it has been fun watching the Bengals.
__________________
"panic" only comes from having real expectations
GAC is offline  
Old 11-28-2011, 08:53 AM   #190
RiverRat13
Winning is fun.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Urbana, OH
Posts: 649
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by GAC View Post
They have to give him the weapons. He's thrown for almost 2,200 yds this year so far (200 yds/game), and done so with mediocre receivers and really no down field threat. Massaquoi has been hurt, in and out, and after that who do we have at WR other then rookie Little (who I think is gonna be a good one)?
I'm not sold on McCoy, but as you said, I don't know how any determination could be made about him with how little of a supporting cast he's been given. The Browns need some playmakers on offense. I know everyone loves a good trade-down in the draft, but I think they would have been better off taking Jones than making the trade with Atlanta because they have McCoy as the starting QB. If the Browns knew one way or the other about Colt, I'd understand trading down. But to me it looks like a mistake as they'll have to make an uninformed decision about him this offseason.
RiverRat13 is offline  
Old 11-28-2011, 11:22 AM   #191
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,661
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by izzy's dad View Post
Try Walterfootball.com. They have the first three rounds, and they update it every week. Although I have seen them make some pretty weird predictions at times. I get all sorts of geeked up for the draft, and with two picks on the first night I will be off the wall excited.

The Bengals have their QB, WR although I would like them to add some depth, defensive line is superb, but our secondary needs help in the worst sort of way. An uprade at either guard spot is priority too. Our running back situation isn't horrible, but I would trade our earliest first rounder and our second rounder, possibly more to land Trent Richardson. Won't happen, but it is a nice thought.
I'd suggest these sites:

http://www.mynfldraft.com/NFL-Mock-Draft (updated every week and usually very accurate)

http://www.draftcountdown.com/sub/Mock-Draft-A.php (updated once a month)
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline  
Old 11-28-2011, 11:49 AM   #192
bucksfan2
Waitin til next year
 
bucksfan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,650
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiverRat13 View Post
I'm not sold on McCoy, but as you said, I don't know how any determination could be made about him with how little of a supporting cast he's been given. The Browns need some playmakers on offense. I know everyone loves a good trade-down in the draft, but I think they would have been better off taking Jones than making the trade with Atlanta because they have McCoy as the starting QB. If the Browns knew one way or the other about Colt, I'd understand trading down. But to me it looks like a mistake as they'll have to make an uninformed decision about him this offseason.
The trade down strategy made a whole lot of sense before everyone wanted to do it. The problem with trading down is you miss out on some of the best talent out there. It always sounds good in principle, but its more difficult to execute than it used to be. Heck just this past draft I wanted the Bengals to trade out of the 4 slot so they could draft Dalton late in the 1st round. Never in my wildest dreams did I think Green would be this good.

Cleveland has been lacking in talent for quite a while now. They just don't have the skill players required at the NFL level. When I see Cleveland play they play hard, play tough, but in the end they lose out because of the difference in talent.
bucksfan2 is offline  
Old 11-28-2011, 12:38 PM   #193
traderumor
Unsolicited Opinions
 
traderumor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,743
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohayou View Post
Did anyone catch Simpson's flop today? Just pure comedy gold...

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d...headline_stack
I saw the push, did not see the flop. That is simply hilarious. I smell some kind of ESPY for that.
__________________
Can't win with 'em

Can't win without 'em
traderumor is offline  
Old 11-28-2011, 12:42 PM   #194
traderumor
Unsolicited Opinions
 
traderumor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,743
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

I haven't gotten to watch too many complete games this year, but did this one. From the opening drive, I smelled upset special. Not sure what they were doing differently than expected in the first half, but it had to be something as they were beating us on the line on both sides of the ball. And Gruden was channeling Brat down on the goal line.

But then, as has turned into a trend, the Bengals adjusted in the second half and dominated to bring home the win. The Oline started keeping the Dline out of the backfield, the D held the Browns to a FG, started getting sacks and hits on McCoy, and the tide turned.
__________________
Can't win with 'em

Can't win without 'em
traderumor is offline  
Old 11-28-2011, 12:49 PM   #195
TeamSelig
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,727
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by traderumor View Post
I saw the push, did not see the flop. That is simply hilarious. I smell some kind of ESPY for that.
Wow, that is hilarious
TeamSelig is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25