![]() |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Troy, OH
Posts: 2,537
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
Quote:
I think the review process needs to be seriously revamped. "Indisputable video evidence" seems to have several definitions, depending on the replay official. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||
|
Be the ball
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 11,120
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
Quote:
Quote:
Interesting "2011 NCAA Football Instant Replay Casebook" read here... http://www.ncaapublications.com/prod...oads/FBC11.pdf
__________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit." |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,655
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
I thought it was a catch also. Not sure how they could overturn it.
Horrible coaching by David Shaw at the end of the Stanford/Oklahoma State game. You have the ball at the Oklahoma State 25, with 50 seconds, three timeouts, and a superstar at QB, and you put the game in the hands of a freshman kicker? Seriously? Put the game in Luck's hands and he wins it.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,254
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 2,666
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
Clemson is in full on melt down mode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
West Virginia is destroying Clemson. Hilarious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,061
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
This game is fun! Give that man a pay raise! We have our coach for the next two decades!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 5,465
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
The Rodney King beatdown wasn't even this bad.
Michigan in the Sugar followed 24 hours later by West Virginia in the Orange. Somewhere RichRod is crying in a beer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,061
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
Quote:
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
Tavon Austin is ridiculous...fun to watch.
Although it sucked watching him make the Bearcat defense look bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Be the ball
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 11,120
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
Will WVU hit 100?
__________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit." |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
Doubt it. The backups are in now and Millard just threw a pick.
Quote:
If WVU couldn't keep Rich Rodriguez, a West Virginia native, as head coach, I don't see how they will be able to keep Holgorsen. Then again, you could say the same for Nehlen, who had the opportunity to leave for Wisconsin (which ultimately went to Barry Alvarez). I don't see Holgorsen having that loyalty, and if a Texas school opens and offers to get him off "The Island", it might happen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,061
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
Quote:
Which is Holgorsen? I don't know, but I always ask the question is it better to stick around and try to become the Bear Bryant of the school or is it better to go to where Bear Bryant coached and be one of many? I THINK Holgorsen is a different cat than Rich Rod, I don't THINK Holgorsen would leave just for a "higher prestige" job, for him it would have to make sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
Going to the Big 12 will help WVU keep a coach.
Lots of couches bidding their end tables and lamps farewell right about now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,342
|
Re: BCS bowls discussion
Does the ACC really deserve a BCS bid? they are now 2-13 in BCS bowl games.
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |