![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who is Redszone's #21 prospect? | |||
| RHP Andrew Brackman |
|
13 | 32.50% |
| RHP Tim Crabbe |
|
27 | 67.50% |
| Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Prospect #21 Runoff
RHP Andrew Brackman, or RHP Tim Crabbe?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,681
|
Re: Prospect #21 Runoff
Crabbe for all the reasons explained in the last several threads. BTW, John Sickels has Crabbe at number 14. Brackman is not in the top 20.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Two-Time Batting Champ
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loveland, OH
Posts: 2,632
|
Re: Prospect #21 Runoff
Seconded. Brackman is a great guy, a local guy, but he still had a 7.0 BB/9. The Reds are already saying that he's being moved to the bullpen and I don't value bullpen arms that much. Crabbe has great stuff as well and exhibited much better control in 2011. There is a reason the Reds are giving him a shot in the AA rotation in 2012 and Sickels has him at #14.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,681
|
Re: Prospect #21 Runoff
Quote:
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 940
|
Re: Prospect #21 Runoff
Agree with all of the above reasons. Crabbe for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,915
|
Re: Prospect #21 Runoff
I have no objective reason to choose Brackman over Crabbe - Crabbe looks like somebody to really pay attention to. But, I'm can't help but think of Randy Johnson's mid 20s. Brackman showed in 2010 that he's capable of keeping the walks down. Maybe that was just young guys chasing stuff out of the zone, but I can't keep myself from dreaming on him.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,692
|
Re: Prospect #21 Runoff
Quote:
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,044
|
Re: Prospect #21 Runoff
Has anything been announced about the way they're planning to use Brackman? I'd also like to see them give him a chance to start.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Two-Time Batting Champ
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loveland, OH
Posts: 2,632
|
Re: Prospect #21 Runoff
Walt has said that he plans on using Brackman in the bullpen. Sorry, I don't have time to find the quote, I'm sure if you dug through the Brackman signing thread in the ORG you could find the quote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,692
|
Re: Prospect #21 Runoff
Quote:
With Crabbe, he simply doesn't have three pitches at this point and has been a professional for several seasons now, meaning his chances of finding a workable third pitch are getting less and less with each game he throws. The Reds had him working out of the bullpen at times this season. That tells you that even they weren't sure he was going to work as a starter and find that third pitch. Now, I am sure someone will say "well they probably feel that way with Brackman since he is said to be in the bullpen". Sure, I can see where you are coming from, but unlike Crabbe, he does have the pitches to actually start right now.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |