![]() |
|
|
#931 | |
|
Charlie Brown All-Star
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mt. Juliet, TN
Posts: 4,675
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
__________________
"I don't have a baseball team, I have a theological seminary." -- Charlie Brown |
|
|
|
|
|
#932 |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,989
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
#933 | |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,989
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
With Dalton and company I think they need a force at RB. One that can carry the load and catch out of the backfield and block Richardson is available and can do all 3 things. That said I would love to find a way to get said RB without spending those 2 1st rounders on them because the OL and secondary (and arguably the LB corps) need an infusion of talent. Anyone think we could get Matt Forte for a 1st round pick?
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
#934 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,591
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#935 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,638
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
I wonder if there is any availability for Steven Jackson? Always liked him, Rams are clearly bottomed out... Thoughts?
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
#936 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
I think the Bengals should sniff around Fred Jackson. He was having a career year before a broken bone in his leg. He fits the West Coast well and the Bills have Spiller. He may be older but he has low mileage, as he was late getting to the NFL. 3rd round pick could do it.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
#937 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,591
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
|
|
|
|
|
#938 |
|
Will post for food
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,088
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Mike Tolbert.
|
|
|
|
|
#939 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ft. Wright, Ky
Posts: 47
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Isn't Marshawn Lynch a FA this year. May be worth taking a flyer on if he will leave Seattle. He's averaged 4 ypc for his career and seems to have pretty good hands out of the backfield and he's only 25.
|
|
|
|
|
#940 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,016
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
I think the ideal back for Gruden's system in Micheal Bush. Bruiser with great hands. I believe he's a FA as well. Being from Louisville, he might even be inclined to sign here.
|
|
|
|
|
#941 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,416
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#942 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,416
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Now that is an interesting idea. Bush or Hillis (the latter on a one-year deal) are the FA RBs I'd target. I really like the idea of Bush.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! Last edited by Benihana; 01-13-2012 at 12:36 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#943 |
|
Be the ball
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 11,120
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
I think a major contributing factor to the Bengals' 2nd-half defense decline was Dunlap's hamstring pull. He was an absolute terror the first half of the year but never was the same after pulling a hammy.
__________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit." |
|
|
|
|
#944 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
How has no one reported on Gruden's 3 year extension yet?
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stor...ordinator.html
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
#945 |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,989
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Bush is a decent fall back option and/or backup RB candidate (i.e. someone who can carry the load should the #1 go down) but he is a bit too one dimensional or if you will just not dynamic enough. As an example I am looking for our McFadden with Bush as a capable backup. We need someone who flat scares the opposing defense because IMO Dalton needs electric players so we don't have to plod down the field alot. Green is one, IMO Simpson can be a solid #2 (unless he wants too much money), Gresham is sound for TE (though nowhere near a Jimmy Graham or Aaron Hernandez type) assuming we have an electric RB in place.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |