![]() |
|
|
#226 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
I'm able to form my own opinions without help.
From an outsiders view what I saw with the Broncos was a team rallying around a strong leader and playing better football. You can look at Tebow's physical QB skills and analyze them all day. There are tons of flaws and a lot of room for improvement. It's only fair to take into account his intangibles, and that is something that most would agree are off the chart. There are guys like Carson Palmer with all of the skills you could ever want and none of the intangibles, then there are guys like Tebow who are the exact opposite, and then a guy like Tom Brady who has the best of both worlds. It's often said in sports that great leaders elevate the game of everyone around them, I'm pretty sure that's what we saw happen in Denver. Because lets be real, that team doesn't really have a ton of talent or anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
#227 | |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
Quote:
I don't know and neither do you, nor does anyone else. I think they were probably just as likely, but it's just speculation. Did you forget that they won 6 in a row with Orton back in 2009? Did you see where I posted that 3 of the 4 losses with Orton as QB were less than 5 points with 2 of them being by 3 points or less? Did you read where I said they actually scored more points per game with Orton at QB than with Tebow? If the offense actually scored more points per game with QB X than QB Y, then how is so far-fetched to think that they'd have been just as likely the playoffs with QB X? You'd have to be a moron to think scoring less points per game increases a team's chances of winning. I don't know what everyone else thinks, but I have to believe scoring more points is better than scoring less. And I also have to think that if QB Y is much better than QB X, then the offense would actually perform better. If the offense performed worse, then I'd have a hard time concluding that the leader of that offense was significantly better. I know which team won the game when the 2 QBs played head to head. And you do realize the Chiefs won 2 of 3 once they acquired Orton, including the sole loss the Packers had the whole year. They had loss 4 of 5 prior to that. Their only loss was a 3 point loss to Oakland. It gets really fuzzy when you start trying to pins wins and losses on a QB.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David Last edited by MWM; 01-17-2012 at 09:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#228 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
Quote:
I won't call you a moron for thinking the Broncos were headed anywhere with Orton as QB but I'll say stats be damned, there's no way they win the West with Orton as QB. There is no right or wrong answer as we'll never know but I'm amazed how anyone can think that Tebow didn't inspire his team to the playoffs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#229 |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
Because the facts don't support that assertion, that's how.
When all they needed was one win to get in, he couldn't seem to "inspire" them then. On a game where they won and they were in the playoffs, the offense managed all of 3 points. Is that "inspiring"? Maybe he inspired the rest of the AFC to suck REALLY bad. Because it you're basing this whole inspiration idea on them getting into the playoffs, that was the real reason they go there.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David Last edited by MWM; 01-17-2012 at 09:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#230 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#231 |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
Actually, I think one must look further than the QB.
And it's not his stats. The offense scored LESS points with him. No one really knows what would have happened, but the implication is that the defense played better because Tebow was the QB. I just can't get behind that line of reasoning. It makes for an interesting narrative, but that doesn't make it truth.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David |
|
|
|
|
|
#232 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,884
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#233 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,609
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
Quote:
Do I think Tebow's attitude helped, sure. But I also think inspired football only takes you so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#234 |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
Maybe Matt Prater was the real inspiration behind the playoff push.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David |
|
|
|
|
|
#235 |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,609
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#236 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
Quote:
I'm glad Tim Tebow is not my QB but I have to give him credit for taking a 1-4 team to the playoffs. I think by any measure he was a successful QB this year but I see problems in the future. In order for him to be successful you have to taylor an offense around him and then what do you do when he gets hurt? How can you possibly have a 2nd/3rd string guy who can run it? And he will get hurt. He even had injuries playing this way in the SEC. Word is that he's hurt right now and if there was a game this weekend, he'd be listed as questionable. I don't think the Broncos have discovered a new way to win in the NFL but I am enamored with how they do exactly that week after week with Tebow completing about two passes a qtr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#237 |
|
Rally Onion!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 33,211
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
I wonder what his views are on painkillers? One would think he's had to make a decision on whether to take them in the past.
__________________
The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160 |
|
|
|
|
|
#238 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#239 | |
|
All Fired Up
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,422
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#240 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,326
|
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?
Some things just seems too good to be true to even be worth contemplating, then one of those things actually happens, and you don't know how to react.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |