RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2012, 06:27 PM   #226
Stray
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutaman View Post
Because the media told them to.
I'm able to form my own opinions without help.

From an outsiders view what I saw with the Broncos was a team rallying around a strong leader and playing better football. You can look at Tebow's physical QB skills and analyze them all day. There are tons of flaws and a lot of room for improvement. It's only fair to take into account his intangibles, and that is something that most would agree are off the chart.

There are guys like Carson Palmer with all of the skills you could ever want and none of the intangibles, then there are guys like Tebow who are the exact opposite, and then a guy like Tom Brady who has the best of both worlds. It's often said in sports that great leaders elevate the game of everyone around them, I'm pretty sure that's what we saw happen in Denver. Because lets be real, that team doesn't really have a ton of talent or anything.
Stray is online now   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 01-17-2012, 09:37 PM   #227
MWM
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
 
MWM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Ray View Post
So do you think the Broncos would have made the playoffs if they'd stuck with Orton?
What happened to sticking with facts? I thought that was your guiding principal?

I don't know and neither do you, nor does anyone else. I think they were probably just as likely, but it's just speculation. Did you forget that they won 6 in a row with Orton back in 2009? Did you see where I posted that 3 of the 4 losses with Orton as QB were less than 5 points with 2 of them being by 3 points or less?

Did you read where I said they actually scored more points per game with Orton at QB than with Tebow? If the offense actually scored more points per game with QB X than QB Y, then how is so far-fetched to think that they'd have been just as likely the playoffs with QB X? You'd have to be a moron to think scoring less points per game increases a team's chances of winning.

I don't know what everyone else thinks, but I have to believe scoring more points is better than scoring less. And I also have to think that if QB Y is much better than QB X, then the offense would actually perform better. If the offense performed worse, then I'd have a hard time concluding that the leader of that offense was significantly better.

I know which team won the game when the 2 QBs played head to head. And you do realize the Chiefs won 2 of 3 once they acquired Orton, including the sole loss the Packers had the whole year. They had loss 4 of 5 prior to that. Their only loss was a 3 point loss to Oakland. It gets really fuzzy when you start trying to pins wins and losses on a QB.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David

Last edited by MWM; 01-17-2012 at 09:46 PM.
MWM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 09:44 PM   #228
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MWM View Post
What happened to sticking with facts? I thought that was your guiding principal?

I don't know and neither do you, nor does anyone else. I think they were probably just as likely, but it's just speculation. Did you forget that they won 6 in a row with Orton back in 2009? Did you see where I posted that 3 of the 4 losses with Orton as QB were less than 5 points with 2 of them being by 3 points or less?

Did you read where I said they actually scored more points per game with Orton at QB than with Tebow? If the offense actually scored more points per game with QB X than QB Y, then how is so far-fetched to think that they'd have been just as likely the playoffs with QB X? You'd have to be a moron to think scoring less points per game increases a team's chances of winning.

I don't know what everyone else thinks, but I have to believe scoring more points is better. I know which team won the game when the 2 QBs played head to head.
You're confusing threads and I'm not surprised. I'm asking for speculation. Your opinion here. Granted none of us possess the power of Miss Cleo so there's no right or wrong answer when we try to guess if the Broncos would have fared better with Orton or Tebow.

I won't call you a moron for thinking the Broncos were headed anywhere with Orton as QB but I'll say stats be damned, there's no way they win the West with Orton as QB.

There is no right or wrong answer as we'll never know but I'm amazed how anyone can think that Tebow didn't inspire his team to the playoffs
Sea Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 09:48 PM   #229
MWM
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
 
MWM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Because the facts don't support that assertion, that's how.

When all they needed was one win to get in, he couldn't seem to "inspire" them then. On a game where they won and they were in the playoffs, the offense managed all of 3 points. Is that "inspiring"?

Maybe he inspired the rest of the AFC to suck REALLY bad. Because it you're basing this whole inspiration idea on them getting into the playoffs, that was the real reason they go there.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David

Last edited by MWM; 01-17-2012 at 09:50 PM.
MWM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 09:50 PM   #230
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MWM View Post
Because the facts don't support that assertion, that's how.
It's my opinion that Tebow cannot be fully evaluated on stats alone. If you go by his stats, you can't figure out how his team won several of those games. One must look further than that.
Sea Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 10:47 PM   #231
MWM
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
 
MWM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Actually, I think one must look further than the QB.

And it's not his stats. The offense scored LESS points with him. No one really knows what would have happened, but the implication is that the defense played better because Tebow was the QB. I just can't get behind that line of reasoning. It makes for an interesting narrative, but that doesn't make it truth.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David
MWM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 11:52 PM   #232
Mutaman
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,884
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stray View Post
I'm able to form my own opinions without help.
Do you honestly think there would be a thread with over 200 posts if it wasn't for the hype? Why not a big thread for Cam Newton?
Mutaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 08:19 AM   #233
bucksfan2
Waitin til next year
 
bucksfan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,609
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Ray View Post
You're confusing threads and I'm not surprised. I'm asking for speculation. Your opinion here. Granted none of us possess the power of Miss Cleo so there's no right or wrong answer when we try to guess if the Broncos would have fared better with Orton or Tebow.

I won't call you a moron for thinking the Broncos were headed anywhere with Orton as QB but I'll say stats be damned, there's no way they win the West with Orton as QB.

There is no right or wrong answer as we'll never know but I'm amazed how anyone can think that Tebow didn't inspire his team to the playoffs
The Broncos won a game agaisnt a previously defeated team by scoring 15 points including an onsides kick recovery in the last few minutes of a game. They also sent a game into overtime with a 59 yard FG make and won the game with another long FG. They went 8-8 with a handful, yes a handful, of unprobable wins. Do I think Orton could have done that? I think if the defense played as good during a 6 game stretch they would have won more games easily than they did with Tebow at the helm.

Do I think Tebow's attitude helped, sure. But I also think inspired football only takes you so far.
bucksfan2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 09:09 AM   #234
MWM
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
 
MWM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Maybe Matt Prater was the real inspiration behind the playoff push.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David
MWM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 09:25 AM   #235
bucksfan2
Waitin til next year
 
bucksfan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,609
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MWM View Post
Maybe Matt Prater was the real inspiration behind the playoff push.
Prater was a stud during their winning streak. Dude was nailing 50 yard FG's like they were 30 yarders.
bucksfan2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 01:23 PM   #236
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MWM View Post
Actually, I think one must look further than the QB.

And it's not his stats. The offense scored LESS points with him. No one really knows what would have happened, but the implication is that the defense played better because Tebow was the QB. I just can't get behind that line of reasoning. It makes for an interesting narrative, but that doesn't make it truth.
I noticed the same thing in Boomer's last year when he replaced Jeff Blake. All of a sudden the O-line didn't suck and the defense seemed to play better. It's happened before when one player elevates the entire team.

I'm glad Tim Tebow is not my QB but I have to give him credit for taking a 1-4 team to the playoffs. I think by any measure he was a successful QB this year but I see problems in the future. In order for him to be successful you have to taylor an offense around him and then what do you do when he gets hurt? How can you possibly have a 2nd/3rd string guy who can run it?

And he will get hurt. He even had injuries playing this way in the SEC. Word is that he's hurt right now and if there was a game this weekend, he'd be listed as questionable.

I don't think the Broncos have discovered a new way to win in the NFL but I am enamored with how they do exactly that week after week with Tebow completing about two passes a qtr
Sea Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 02:45 PM   #237
Chip R
Rally Onion!
 
Chip R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 33,211
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Ray View Post
And he will get hurt. He even had injuries playing this way in the SEC. Word is that he's hurt right now and if there was a game this weekend, he'd be listed as questionable.
I wonder what his views are on painkillers? One would think he's had to make a decision on whether to take them in the past.
__________________
The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160
Chip R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 02:59 PM   #238
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
I wonder what his views are on painkillers? One would think he's had to make a decision on whether to take them in the past.
I doubt he'd have a problem with them as long as they're taken to kill pain and not to get high
Sea Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 12:59 PM   #239
Revering4Blue
All Fired Up
 
Revering4Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,422
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Jets acquire Tim Tebow for draft pick

http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/stor...4th-round-pick
__________________
Quote:
I have just been more than a little suspect of all the trades since the Willy (Scott Williamson) cash grab. That one left such a bad taste in my mouth that even a 1985 Dom Pérignon couldn't cleanse it.--Creek14
Revering4Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 01:07 PM   #240
blumj
Member
 
blumj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,326
Re: Where's the Tim Tebow thread?

Some things just seems too good to be true to even be worth contemplating, then one of those things actually happens, and you don't know how to react.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons
blumj is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25