![]() |
|
|
#961 | |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
#962 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
I don't have a problem giving credit where credit is due. If you want to look at their 2nd and 3rd wins/appearances then you have a legit claim that it takes an elite QB to win. But in looking at their 1st appearances they were hardly elite. |
|
|
|
|
|
#963 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
|
|
|
|
|
#964 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 739
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
In other news, Jon Kitna retired like 4 days ago.
__________________
Choo got it, dude. |
|
|
|
|
#965 |
|
Winning is fun.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Urbana, OH
Posts: 632
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Zimmer is out as a candidate for Miami.
In his first mock draft, Kiper has the Bengals taking Dennard and Lamar Miller. |
|
|
|
|
#966 | |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,994
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
#967 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
They way I look at the Bengals they have a difference maker at WR, two very good LT, two potential difference makers on the DL in Dunlap and Adkins with Peko being a nice solid player. They appear to have a solid franchise QB in place who you expect to get better as he develops more. The nice thing is they are set in positions that require very high draft picks, QB, LT, RT. I do think that they need to adderss their back 7, get another WR, and need to address RB. I think if they get creative this offseason in moving Clemens to S that may shore up one faulty defensive spot. They need CB because no one knows what will happen to Hall when he comes back. Outside of CB I think they need to add more difference makers, anywhere on the field. |
|
|
|
|
|
#968 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
The only thing I'd add to your assessment is offensive line. I think we are in dire need of better guard play. I think we need not one but two new Gs in 2012. I'd put that need at #2 on the list behind CB. RB is also a big need but this is a position where you rarely need a top draftpick. You can do very well picking these guys up late like Rudi Johnson, Arian Foster and even Willie Parker |
|
|
|
|
|
#969 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
Guard play does need to get better but at the same time teams don't really place a premium on guard play. You can get a good guard fairly cheap, unlike a LT or RT. |
|
|
|
|
|
#970 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
I think guard play is very important. In fact no matter how good our center and LT were, we've never had a good o-line without a stud guard like Montoya or Steinbach in there |
|
|
|
|
|
#971 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,106
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
THis team had had barely average to bad Centers since Braham. I do not know how they can look at their Guard and Center play, especially LG.....for the last 5 years and wonder why they can never establish any running game at all..... yet Marvin wants to be a running team. |
|
|
|
|
|
#972 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,432
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
I'd like to see the Bengals choose two from Richardson, DeCastro, Kirkpatrick, Barron and Floyd. Some of them won't be available when we pick, some of them will. If Richardson is off the board, I do not want to see the Bengals draft a RB in the first round. Ditto for Kirkpatrick and CB. Not enough value with the second tier of guys at those positions (Miller and Wilson at RB, Jenkins and Dennard at CB). Similarly, Barron is the only safety in the draft with a 1st round grade.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#973 |
|
Winning is fun.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Urbana, OH
Posts: 632
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Does anyone think Leon Hall ends up at safety next year? I could see him as a step slower coming back from a torn achilles tendon.
|
|
|
|
|
#974 | |
|
Winning is fun.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Urbana, OH
Posts: 632
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
Quote:
As far as free agency, interior OL and an upgrade at WR2 should be the priorities. Dalton could benefit from a veteran across from Green to go with all of the young guys. |
|
|
|
|
|
#975 |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: 2011 Bengals Discussion Part II
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |