RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-25-2012, 03:11 PM   #46
Mario-Rijo
HOF CLASS OF '12
 
Mario-Rijo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,987
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoganBuck View Post
Well, I was wrong on Decastro's agility. He pretty much solidified his status. Cordy Glenn running a 5.15 40, at 345? Wow.
Well DeCastro didn't run very well 5.43 below average. Doesn't seem to jibe with his gametape but who knows. The thing I like about Glenn is he has the measurements to be a potential RT down the road if need be and I'm not sure Andre Smith will remain a Bengal when he comes a FA. I'd hate to invest the contract he'll no doubt be looking for on a season or 2 of good but not stellar play. Having Glenn at RG would give the Bengals some leverage in such a situation at the very least. Not sure about his feet/quickness but it seems at least possible.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports


"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

--Woody Hayes
Mario-Rijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 02-25-2012, 03:21 PM   #47
LoganBuck
I hate the Cubs
 
LoganBuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,580
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario-Rijo View Post
Well DeCastro didn't run very well 5.43 below average. Doesn't seem to jibe with his gametape but who knows. The thing I like about Glenn is he has the measurements to be a potential RT down the road if need be and I'm not sure Andre Smith will remain a Bengal when he comes a FA. I'd hate to invest the contract he'll no doubt be looking for on a season or 2 of good but not stellar play. Having Glenn at RG would give the Bengals some leverage in such a situation at the very least. Not sure about his feet/quickness but it seems at least possible.
DeCastro looked better in the cones and position drills than I expected. The reason I expected him to drop is because pretty much every year, the top guard comes to the combine, and "disappoints". Guards are more of a 2nd-4th round position. Teams are looking for confirmation biases. Decastro did everything I expect an interior lineman to do. Glenn does provide insurance against Smith leaving. I just don't want to give Andre Smith a big payday. I read were he was like the 13th best statistical tackle in the league this season (Whitworth was like 5th). I worry that he will go back to being a slob if the carrot is taken away.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor
LoganBuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2012, 10:17 PM   #48
Mario-Rijo
HOF CLASS OF '12
 
Mario-Rijo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,987
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoganBuck View Post
DeCastro looked better in the cones and position drills than I expected. The reason I expected him to drop is because pretty much every year, the top guard comes to the combine, and "disappoints". Guards are more of a 2nd-4th round position. Teams are looking for confirmation biases. Decastro did everything I expect an interior lineman to do. Glenn does provide insurance against Smith leaving. I just don't want to give Andre Smith a big payday. I read were he was like the 13th best statistical tackle in the league this season (Whitworth was like 5th). I worry that he will go back to being a slob if the carrot is taken away.
Agree with the Andre situation. One stellar season would set him up for a monster deal and I suspect that could be the end for him, might get one more decent season but I wouldn't expect more than that.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports


"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

--Woody Hayes
Mario-Rijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2012, 08:50 AM   #49
RiverRat13
Free Aroldis!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Urbana, OH
Posts: 630
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario-Rijo View Post
The thing I like about Glenn is he has the measurements to be a potential RT down the road if need be and I'm not sure Andre Smith will remain a Bengal when he comes a FA.
I think that's a great point and hopefully something the Bengals consider.
RiverRat13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012, 03:58 PM   #50
Mario-Rijo
HOF CLASS OF '12
 
Mario-Rijo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,987
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiverRat13 View Post
I think that's a great point and hopefully something the Bengals consider.
Also Bobby Massie in the 2nd ala Whitworth. Use him as a OG now and an OT in the future. Killing 2 birds with one stone is wise way to go.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports


"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

--Woody Hayes
Mario-Rijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 07:56 AM   #51
RiverRat13
Free Aroldis!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Urbana, OH
Posts: 630
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario-Rijo View Post
Also Bobby Massie in the 2nd ala Whitworth. Use him as a OG now and an OT in the future. Killing 2 birds with one stone is wise way to go.
I do think it is a wise strategy. I'd make Andre prove he's legit a second year and a Glenn and/or Massie as a backup plan is a wise strategy. If Andre does well, you can always franchise him for a year and then work out something longer term. I'm just afraid Mikey uses this offseason to give fat contracts to guys like Smith who haven't totally proven themselves (like Gathers a few years ago) instead of using money at a few key spots in free agency.
RiverRat13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 12:03 PM   #52
texasdave
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,528
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Jerome Simpson pleads guilty. Could get up to 60 days in the hole.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/C...-charge-030112
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!!
texasdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2012, 02:37 PM   #53
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,406
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benihana View Post
Not going to happen. I'll bet you on it. Specifically with Rice.
Further affirmation:
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...oing-anywhere/
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2012, 08:18 PM   #54
sonny
You're being very UnDude.
 
sonny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,575
Bengals use franchise tag on Nugent. Championship!
__________________
Witty signature.
sonny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012, 07:18 PM   #55
Dom Heffner
Potential Lunch Winner
 
Dom Heffner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,666
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Trading up?

Nice move.

http://cincinnati.com/blogs/sports/2...ssey=obnetwork
__________________
If you're watchin' a parade, make sure you stand in one spot, don't follow it, it never changes. And if the parade is boring, run in the opposite direction, you will fast-foward the parade. --Mitch Hedberg
Dom Heffner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012, 08:23 PM   #56
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

All reports have Tampa taking Richardson as they absolutely love him, however things could change between now and the draft. I would imagine things will heat up if the Cards are on the clock and Richardson is still there.

As far as tagging Nugent I have no problem with it. I'd rather tag him then Nelson who is average at best at the safety position, no use paying him top 5 money when he isn't top 5 talent. I'd rather pay money to Landry.

Why do I have the feeling with 60 million the Bengals will sit on their hands with Nate Livings as the only signing.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 08:14 AM   #57
Dan
OlafTheBlack
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 2,033
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom Heffner View Post
Not a fan of that move. If Richardson falls to them at 17, they should, as I read elsewhere, make light speed to the podium. But there is enough running back talent that I'd rather see them draft a solid OG and a lesser RB than trade the opportunity to improve the line in lieu of a running back that is going to need that line.

Actually, if Richardson fell to them at 17, what I wouldn't mind seeing is them trade down and get both of New England's First round picks as well as one of their second rounders. Then with the five picks in the first two rounds draft CB, DL, OG, OG, RB in no particular order.
__________________
Genius|Madness

"Somebody will be bigger, stronger and faster than you, growing up," Griffey said with a shrug. "So why worry about it? As long as you don't let them outwork you, and you can look yourself in the mirror, then that's all you should worry about. Never worry about what somebody else is doing."
Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 09:53 AM   #58
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan View Post
Not a fan of that move. If Richardson falls to them at 17, they should, as I read elsewhere, make light speed to the podium. But there is enough running back talent that I'd rather see them draft a solid OG and a lesser RB than trade the opportunity to improve the line in lieu of a running back that is going to need that line.

Actually, if Richardson fell to them at 17, what I wouldn't mind seeing is them trade down and get both of New England's First round picks as well as one of their second rounders. Then with the five picks in the first two rounds draft CB, DL, OG, OG, RB in no particular order.
The only problem there is that NE has to offer you that much and I don't see that happening
Sea Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 06:14 PM   #59
Ohayou
Member
 
Ohayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 736
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Lewis/Gruden seem to be really high on Pead.
__________________
Choo got it, dude.
Ohayou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 08:54 PM   #60
sonny
You're being very UnDude.
 
sonny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,575
A little surprised the Bengals haven't signed anyone yet in FA. even a second- tier player would send a message.
__________________
Witty signature.
sonny is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25