![]() |
|
|
#76 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 9,228
|
Re: Peyton
It wasn't about cap space for this year. Most money was a "long term" deal. They were talking "Life time contract".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 739
|
Re: Peyton
Slightly OT: Dolphins sign David Garrard
__________________
Choo got it, dude. |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 | |
|
Beer is good!!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,134
|
Re: Peyton
Quote:
__________________
"Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 | |
|
part of BBN
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,300
|
Re: Peyton
Quote:
The NFC will feature NYG-GB-Chicago (Cutler back) and SF. Throw in teams like NO,Detroit and Dallas and maybe an improved Philly team and you can see where his path will probably be much better in the AFC, not saying it is a pushover though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
We are back!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Warsaw, IN
Posts: 675
|
Re: Peyton
Quote:
__________________
...and this one belongs to the Reds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,135
|
Re: Peyton
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
|
Re: Peyton
I agree. I can't imagine that anyone would believe Peyton would merely go where he'll get the most money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,334
|
Re: Peyton
I think SF's defense would have been a huge help, but Denver still gives him a pretty good chance and Elway and Fox in charge there probably just makes it a better fit. I can't imagine that any team seriously interested wouldn't have been offering comparable money.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
For a Level Playing Field
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Oakwood, OH
Posts: 11,248
|
Re: Peyton
Being reported as 5-yr/$96-million. After being denied the $23 million from Indy this year... Latrell Spreewell hopes Peyton can feed his kids.
__________________
Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
|
Re: Peyton
I've said some things about Peyton that have been somewhat unpopular in these parts. But I wish him the best. However, I have to think you can count on one hand the number of quarterbacks who have truly been elite at the age of 36+. That said, who do you suppose the last such QB was, and where did he play? As a football fan, I can't wait to see this play out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: Peyton
I think this is a massive gamble for the Broncos. Its something that I think makes sense, but there have been too many people during the Manning sweepstakes who just assume that he will regain his form from a number of years ago. The two guys in recent memory who have had success into their late 30's were Elway and Favre, both of who I would consider better all around athletes than Manning. I am very interested to see how the Peyton experiment goes.
I think that this upcoming season and next season are his best shots. After that I think its a crap shoot as to whether or not he can play at a top tier level. |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
For a Level Playing Field
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Oakwood, OH
Posts: 11,248
|
Re: Peyton
How many years ago was good enough to lead a good team far into the playoffs? He seemed well above-average just two years ago IMO. You say "a number of years ago"... just need clarification on when it is that Manning became just a normal QB.
__________________
Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 | |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
|
Re: Peyton
Quote:
I don't know what Manning to expect and no one really does. I don't know if were going to see the great Manning ever again. I don't know how he will come back after after a year off and 3 pretty major neck surgeries. I found it mildly annoying when anyone would suggest there is a lot of risk with Manning that the replies were always, its Peyton he is great. You heard all summer, if Peyton Manning is available you have to go get him. Really? Of the teams involved all had massive QB issues. You didn't see any teams with a firm QB situation even attempt to acquirer Peyton. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
On the brink
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: is everything
Posts: 2,488
|
Re: Peyton
I don't even know if "elite" is an apt description. A quick search turned up the following quarterbacks that had good years at over 36: Steve Young, John Elway, Warren Moon, Brett Favre, Rich Gannon, Kurt Warner. I'm sure there are a few others, but there can't be many.
__________________
How do we know he's not Mel Torme? |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
part of BBN
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,300
|
Re: Peyton
It isnt like Manning's last good year was 2007. Also people talk of QB'S like Elway (who was my favorite growing up) and Favre etc. Many of these guys are or were known for things such as arm strength or feet etc which would fade with age.
PM isnt known for either. His passes in fact rarely look very pretty as far as a tight spiral. What he does have is accuracy and an incredible intelligence of running the offense. I think and hope he will be able to continue these things in the Mile High City. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |