RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-19-2012, 08:43 PM   #76
JaxRed
Member
 
JaxRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 9,228
Re: Peyton

It wasn't about cap space for this year. Most money was a "long term" deal. They were talking "Life time contract".
JaxRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 03-19-2012, 09:11 PM   #77
Ohayou
Member
 
Ohayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 739
Re: Peyton

Slightly OT: Dolphins sign David Garrard
__________________
Choo got it, dude.
Ohayou is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2012, 09:15 PM   #78
George Anderson
Beer is good!!
 
George Anderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,129
Re: Peyton

Quote:
Originally Posted by improbus View Post
Is it possible that Peyton went to the team with the most money to pay him? It's weird that hasn't been discussed. We all assume that he is signing for purely football reasons, but if that were the case, wouldn't the team that needed just two or three 3rd down conversions to make the super bowl (San Francisco) make more sense?
Manning was going to the team that gives him the best chance at winning another SB. It is debatable if Denver is that team but money played little part in where he went. He already is rich beyond belief, he badly desires to add another SB to his legacy.
__________________
"Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard
George Anderson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2012, 09:22 PM   #79
jmac
part of BBN
 
jmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,300
Re: Peyton

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Anderson View Post
Manning was going to the team that gives him the best chance at winning another SB. It is debatable if Denver is that team but money played little part in where he went. He already is rich beyond belief, he badly desires to add another SB to his legacy.
As some on ESPN were discussing today, PM's chances are probably better getting to the SB in the AFC than NFC.
The NFC will feature NYG-GB-Chicago (Cutler back) and SF. Throw in teams like NO,Detroit and Dallas and maybe an improved Philly team and you can see where his path will probably be much better in the AFC, not saying it is a pushover though.
jmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2012, 10:44 PM   #80
Assembly Hall
We are back!
 
Assembly Hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Warsaw, IN
Posts: 675
Re: Peyton

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmac View Post
As some on ESPN were discussing today, PM's chances are probably better getting to the SB in the AFC than NFC.
The NFC will feature NYG-GB-Chicago (Cutler back) and SF. Throw in teams like NO,Detroit and Dallas and maybe an improved Philly team and you can see where his path will probably be much better in the AFC, not saying it is a pushover though.
Definitely an easier path in the AFC.
__________________
...and this one belongs to the Reds.
Assembly Hall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 01:15 AM   #81
Caveat Emperor
Titanic Struggles
 
Caveat Emperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,135
Re: Peyton

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohayou View Post
Didn't the Bucs have the most cap space?
Yes
__________________
Championships Matter.
22 Years and Counting...
Caveat Emperor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 09:04 AM   #82
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,255
Re: Peyton

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Anderson View Post
Manning was going to the team that gives him the best chance at winning another SB. It is debatable if Denver is that team but money played little part in where he went. He already is rich beyond belief, he badly desires to add another SB to his legacy.
I agree. I can't imagine that anyone would believe Peyton would merely go where he'll get the most money.
Sea Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 12:02 PM   #83
blumj
Member
 
blumj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,332
Re: Peyton

I think SF's defense would have been a huge help, but Denver still gives him a pretty good chance and Elway and Fox in charge there probably just makes it a better fit. I can't imagine that any team seriously interested wouldn't have been offering comparable money.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons
blumj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 01:59 PM   #84
RedFanAlways1966
For a Level Playing Field
 
RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Oakwood, OH
Posts: 11,248
Re: Peyton

Being reported as 5-yr/$96-million. After being denied the $23 million from Indy this year... Latrell Spreewell hopes Peyton can feed his kids.
__________________
Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.
RedFanAlways1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 12:12 AM   #85
kaldaniels
Viva la Rolen
 
kaldaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
Re: Peyton

I've said some things about Peyton that have been somewhat unpopular in these parts. But I wish him the best. However, I have to think you can count on one hand the number of quarterbacks who have truly been elite at the age of 36+. That said, who do you suppose the last such QB was, and where did he play? As a football fan, I can't wait to see this play out.
kaldaniels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 08:32 AM   #86
bucksfan2
Waitin til next year
 
bucksfan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
Re: Peyton

I think this is a massive gamble for the Broncos. Its something that I think makes sense, but there have been too many people during the Manning sweepstakes who just assume that he will regain his form from a number of years ago. The two guys in recent memory who have had success into their late 30's were Elway and Favre, both of who I would consider better all around athletes than Manning. I am very interested to see how the Peyton experiment goes.

I think that this upcoming season and next season are his best shots. After that I think its a crap shoot as to whether or not he can play at a top tier level.
bucksfan2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 01:31 PM   #87
RedFanAlways1966
For a Level Playing Field
 
RedFanAlways1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Oakwood, OH
Posts: 11,248
Re: Peyton

Quote:
Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
Ibut there have been too many people during the Manning sweepstakes who just assume that he will regain his form from a number of years ago.
How many years ago was good enough to lead a good team far into the playoffs? He seemed well above-average just two years ago IMO. You say "a number of years ago"... just need clarification on when it is that Manning became just a normal QB.
__________________
Small market fan... always hoping, but never expecting.
RedFanAlways1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 01:47 PM   #88
bucksfan2
Waitin til next year
 
bucksfan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,620
Re: Peyton

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedFanAlways1966 View Post
How many years ago was good enough to lead a good team far into the playoffs? He seemed well above-average just two years ago IMO. You say "a number of years ago"... just need clarification on when it is that Manning became just a normal QB.
Peyton's passer rating for his 2010 season was the lowest since his 2002 season. I don't know if it was age, a flawed stat, a mixture of both, or a bad season that led to that. Prior to the Manning injury there was some concern that the Colts were heading in the wrong direction and most pundits had predicted them to finish 2nd behind the Texans last year.

I don't know what Manning to expect and no one really does. I don't know if were going to see the great Manning ever again. I don't know how he will come back after after a year off and 3 pretty major neck surgeries. I found it mildly annoying when anyone would suggest there is a lot of risk with Manning that the replies were always, its Peyton he is great. You heard all summer, if Peyton Manning is available you have to go get him. Really? Of the teams involved all had massive QB issues. You didn't see any teams with a firm QB situation even attempt to acquirer Peyton.
bucksfan2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 02:06 PM   #89
wolfboy
On the brink
 
wolfboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: is everything
Posts: 2,488
Re: Peyton

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaldaniels View Post
However, I have to think you can count on one hand the number of quarterbacks who have truly been elite at the age of 36+.
I don't even know if "elite" is an apt description. A quick search turned up the following quarterbacks that had good years at over 36: Steve Young, John Elway, Warren Moon, Brett Favre, Rich Gannon, Kurt Warner. I'm sure there are a few others, but there can't be many.
__________________
How do we know he's not Mel Torme?
wolfboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 06:14 PM   #90
jmac
part of BBN
 
jmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,300
Re: Peyton

It isnt like Manning's last good year was 2007. Also people talk of QB'S like Elway (who was my favorite growing up) and Favre etc. Many of these guys are or were known for things such as arm strength or feet etc which would fade with age.
PM isnt known for either. His passes in fact rarely look very pretty as far as a tight spiral. What he does have is accuracy and an incredible intelligence of running the offense.
I think and hope he will be able to continue these things in the Mile High City.
jmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25