![]() |
|
|
#166 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
You unload Rivers for a 5th, Rey could be suspended for the first 4 games due to conduct. Mike Brown loves local product, Kuelchy in the first?
Usually I have a good idea who the Bengals are leaning towards, this season has been a little unclear.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#167 |
|
Free Aroldis!
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Urbana, OH
Posts: 630
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
The Bengals seem to have quite a bit of depth. Any chance they use those three 5th rounders to move up at some point?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
I could see the Bengals moving around to get the WR or RB they covet in the 2nd. The more picks you have the more you can manuever in the draft.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#169 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,121
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
So they got nothing for a first round pick. Nice work.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
|
Big League Choo!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The 513
Posts: 2,157
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
He never played like a first round pick. I'm more impressed they actually got anything for him. The Bengals have actually acquired several players like Rivers (i.e. former first round picks) without giving up anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#171 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Once Ryans was traded to the Eagles for a 4th the market was set for Rivers. I would have loved them to get a 3rd or 4th for him but he never was healthy while with the team which lowered his value greatly.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#172 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Whether the trade works out or not, it shows a shift in strategy from Mike Brown that I never would have accepted.
A draft pick who failed to live up to draft status was generally not traded for lower value than the original draft, even if it made little sense.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life. ---Joe Posnanski |
|
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,404
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Would love to see the Bengals use the extra 5th round picks to trade up from 21 into the mid teens in order to get Barron or Floyd once the other one of them is drafted by another team.
Then take DeCastro or Glenn at 17, and a RB or LB in the 2nd round.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#174 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,616
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
the Bengals might be a better team if Rey were suspended for 16 games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#175 | |
|
HOF CLASS OF '12
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,987
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Quote:
On second thought one other guy who might make sense for them in the 1st though considered perhaps a smidge of a reach by most is Dont'a Hightower.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports 2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports "You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one." --Woody Hayes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#176 |
|
I hate the Cubs
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,580
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Barron and Glenn in for visits today.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor |
|
|
|
|
|
#177 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
This is the Bengals we're talking about. Mike Brown has never been a wheeler dealer or one to manuever much on draft day. Until that changes I'm expecting very little "manuevering"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#178 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
5th rd picks won't move you up in the 1st rd. I'd be mighty ticked if the Bengals traded out of their #17 pick for any combination of 5th rd picks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#179 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,035
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Sea Ray, Mike Brown may not historically be a wheeler and a dealer, but in the last year +, they've moved Carson, Chad & Rivers for draft picks, something they rarely did prior. Times they may be a changing.
Using: http://www.draftcountdown.com/features/Value-Chart.php The Bengals could package their own 5th round pick, along w/ one of the extra 5th round picks to: Move from 17 to 16 Move from 21 to 20 Which in reality, if they move up 1 spot in either of those cases, its because they're targeting a specific player and the team in front of them is seeing other offers, which means the Bengals would likely have to move more than 2 5th round picks. They could also: Move from 58 to 48 (This happens to be the Patriots, a team that usually seems happy to get more picks) Package their 3rd round pick w/ 2 from the 5th to move up to the bottom of the 2nd/top of the 3rd round. Package 2 from the 5th to move up near the top of the 4th round. (Is the draft set up the same as last year, round 1 day 1, rounds 2 & 3 day 2, rounds 4-7 on day 3? If so, this could be a move to move up to the top of the 4th to grab a player that didn't go in the first 2 days after all teams have a night to think things over) Finally, they could package all 3 5th round picks for 1 mid 4th round pick. Moving up in the 1st round, soley by adding 2 (or even 3) 5th round picks w/ one of their #1 picks has a very low % of happening, no matter what Mike Brown's track record says. However, using the 5th round picks to move up 5-6 slots in round 2, or to the top of round 3 or 4 could be worthwhile and a better use of those picks than waiting to see who's available. Now here is something to ponder, using that same chart, lets say the Bengals really wanted to move up and grab Andrew Luck or RGIII. Lets assume this could happen at 2 (where RGIII is 99% going to go), if the Bengals packaged Dalton & the #17 pick, that would assume Dalton is worthy of the #5 pick in this seasons draft. Now obviously this isn't going to happen, but what are the odds if you took what Dalton is considered to be at this point and put him into this draft would he last past the 5th pick???? |
|
|
|
|
|
#180 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
|
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion
Medford, you make my point that the extra 5th rd picks have very, very little value in trades. Using two to move up one spot in the first is not like moving from "21 to the mid teens". I can't see ten rookies making the team so I'd like to see some wheeling and dealing on draft day but I'm not getting my hopes up. Expect very little movement on the part of the Bengals and look for quite a few of our picks to end up on waivers or practice squads...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |