RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-2012, 04:47 PM   #166
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

You unload Rivers for a 5th, Rey could be suspended for the first 4 games due to conduct. Mike Brown loves local product, Kuelchy in the first?

Usually I have a good idea who the Bengals are leaning towards, this season has been a little unclear.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 04-11-2012, 04:55 PM   #167
RiverRat13
Free Aroldis!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Urbana, OH
Posts: 630
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

The Bengals seem to have quite a bit of depth. Any chance they use those three 5th rounders to move up at some point?
RiverRat13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 05:29 PM   #168
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

I could see the Bengals moving around to get the WR or RB they covet in the 2nd. The more picks you have the more you can manuever in the draft.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 05:51 PM   #169
Joseph
Tired of talk. Win!
 
Joseph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,121
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by CTA513 View Post
Bengals got the last pick in the 5th round for Rivers.
So they got nothing for a first round pick. Nice work.
__________________

Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
Chicago Blackhawks - 10
University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
Cincinnati Bengals - None
Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98
Joseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 06:34 PM   #170
HotCorner
Big League Choo!
 
HotCorner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The 513
Posts: 2,157
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph View Post
So they got nothing for a first round pick. Nice work.
He never played like a first round pick. I'm more impressed they actually got anything for him. The Bengals have actually acquired several players like Rivers (i.e. former first round picks) without giving up anything.
HotCorner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 08:02 PM   #171
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph View Post
So they got nothing for a first round pick. Nice work.
Once Ryans was traded to the Eagles for a 4th the market was set for Rivers. I would have loved them to get a 3rd or 4th for him but he never was healthy while with the team which lowered his value greatly.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 09:28 PM   #172
Hoosier Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Whether the trade works out or not, it shows a shift in strategy from Mike Brown that I never would have accepted.

A draft pick who failed to live up to draft status was generally not traded for lower value than the original draft, even if it made little sense.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
---Joe Posnanski
Hoosier Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 11:31 PM   #173
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,404
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Would love to see the Bengals use the extra 5th round picks to trade up from 21 into the mid teens in order to get Barron or Floyd once the other one of them is drafted by another team.

Then take DeCastro or Glenn at 17, and a RB or LB in the 2nd round.
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2012, 07:23 AM   #174
Todd Gack
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,616
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by KoryMac5 View Post
You unload Rivers for a 5th, Rey could be suspended for the first 4 games due to conduct. Mike Brown loves local product, Kuelchy in the first?

Usually I have a good idea who the Bengals are leaning towards, this season has been a little unclear.
the Bengals might be a better team if Rey were suspended for 16 games.
Todd Gack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2012, 10:18 AM   #175
Mario-Rijo
HOF CLASS OF '12
 
Mario-Rijo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 8,987
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by KoryMac5 View Post
You unload Rivers for a 5th, Rey could be suspended for the first 4 games due to conduct. Mike Brown loves local product, Kuelchy in the first?

Usually I have a good idea who the Bengals are leaning towards, this season has been a little unclear.
If Kuelchy drops sure but I don' think he will. I keep seeing DL & either CB or WR in the 1st, probably in that order. I doubt strongly that they will go any other route unless of course Kuelchy or Barron drop to them. Just my gut instinct at this point. But I am hoping Barron gets to us and then most everything else will be gravy.

On second thought one other guy who might make sense for them in the 1st though considered perhaps a smidge of a reach by most is Dont'a Hightower.
__________________
2008 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2009 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports

2010 Reds Draft Prospect RZ Scouting Reports


"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."

--Woody Hayes
Mario-Rijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2012, 12:42 PM   #176
LoganBuck
I hate the Cubs
 
LoganBuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,580
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Barron and Glenn in for visits today.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor
LoganBuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2012, 11:31 AM   #177
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by KoryMac5 View Post
I could see the Bengals moving around to get the WR or RB they covet in the 2nd. The more picks you have the more you can manuever in the draft.
This is the Bengals we're talking about. Mike Brown has never been a wheeler dealer or one to manuever much on draft day. Until that changes I'm expecting very little "manuevering"
Sea Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2012, 11:35 AM   #178
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benihana View Post
Would love to see the Bengals use the extra 5th round picks to trade up from 21 into the mid teens in order to get Barron or Floyd once the other one of them is drafted by another team.

Then take DeCastro or Glenn at 17, and a RB or LB in the 2nd round.
5th rd picks won't move you up in the 1st rd. I'd be mighty ticked if the Bengals traded out of their #17 pick for any combination of 5th rd picks
Sea Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2012, 02:12 PM   #179
medford
Member
 
medford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,035
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Sea Ray, Mike Brown may not historically be a wheeler and a dealer, but in the last year +, they've moved Carson, Chad & Rivers for draft picks, something they rarely did prior. Times they may be a changing.

Using: http://www.draftcountdown.com/features/Value-Chart.php

The Bengals could package their own 5th round pick, along w/ one of the extra 5th round picks to:
Move from 17 to 16
Move from 21 to 20

Which in reality, if they move up 1 spot in either of those cases, its because they're targeting a specific player and the team in front of them is seeing other offers, which means the Bengals would likely have to move more than 2 5th round picks.

They could also:
Move from 58 to 48 (This happens to be the Patriots, a team that usually seems happy to get more picks)

Package their 3rd round pick w/ 2 from the 5th to move up to the bottom of the 2nd/top of the 3rd round.

Package 2 from the 5th to move up near the top of the 4th round. (Is the draft set up the same as last year, round 1 day 1, rounds 2 & 3 day 2, rounds 4-7 on day 3? If so, this could be a move to move up to the top of the 4th to grab a player that didn't go in the first 2 days after all teams have a night to think things over)

Finally, they could package all 3 5th round picks for 1 mid 4th round pick.

Moving up in the 1st round, soley by adding 2 (or even 3) 5th round picks w/ one of their #1 picks has a very low % of happening, no matter what Mike Brown's track record says.

However, using the 5th round picks to move up 5-6 slots in round 2, or to the top of round 3 or 4 could be worthwhile and a better use of those picks than waiting to see who's available.

Now here is something to ponder, using that same chart, lets say the Bengals really wanted to move up and grab Andrew Luck or RGIII. Lets assume this could happen at 2 (where RGIII is 99% going to go), if the Bengals packaged Dalton & the #17 pick, that would assume Dalton is worthy of the #5 pick in this seasons draft. Now obviously this isn't going to happen, but what are the odds if you took what Dalton is considered to be at this point and put him into this draft would he last past the 5th pick????
medford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2012, 02:48 PM   #180
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
Re: 2012 Bengals discussion

Medford, you make my point that the extra 5th rd picks have very, very little value in trades. Using two to move up one spot in the first is not like moving from "21 to the mid teens". I can't see ten rookies making the team so I'd like to see some wheeling and dealing on draft day but I'm not getting my hopes up. Expect very little movement on the part of the Bengals and look for quite a few of our picks to end up on waivers or practice squads...
Sea Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25