![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 538
|
Scott Rolen
So the Nats have figured out you walk Votto, strike out Rolen.
In all seriousness, at this stage of his career, when does Rolen say, "My bat is hurting the team more than my glove is helping it, I'm gonna hang it up"? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Destin, FL
Posts: 57
|
Re: Scott Rolen
I mentioned it in the game thread....why don't you just put Bruce at 4? Is it really that bad to have two lefties back to back? When you're facing a closer, they aren't gonna change..and Votto/Bruce are good enough to hit Righty and Lefty pitchers
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 597
|
Re: Scott Rolen
I'd swap Ludwick and Rolen. Ryan will hit. I think he's still nervous about doing well as a Red, since he's always wanted to play here. Hitting 6th will help take some of the pressure off Rolen.
And I'd platoon Heisey and Stubbs. Stubbs in not an everyday player until he gets his head out of you know where. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: Scott Rolen
Yeah I'm hoping today was a sign of things to come for Ludwick, maybe he's just getting comfortable here. It'd be nice if he can hit a decent 4th.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,014
|
Re: Scott Rolen
Quote:
edit: oh nm, I thought u meant Ludwick. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: marietta,oh
Posts: 201
|
Re: Scott Rolen
Rolen has been toast since July of 2010. I see no reason to think he will get much better. Pathetic number four hitter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I transcend race, hombre
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lexington
Posts: 100
|
Re: Scott Rolen
.358 OPS so far this year. He'll pick up somewhat, but I don't want him hitting (not walking, thanks Dusty) through this slump in the cleanup spot. Goes a long way towards neutralizing our by far most potent threat, Votto.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 36
|
Re: Scott Rolen
Rolen is an awful number 4 hitter. I'd have Ludwick/Bruce hit 4 and put Rolen at 6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 139
|
Re: Scott Rolen
It has been clearly stated numerous times by many members of this forum that rolen is stealing money, this criminal should be cut immediately, even francisco is hitting more than rolen
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 597
|
Re: Scott Rolen
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
malingered here too long
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,980
|
Re: Scott Rolen
Quote:
People (even announcers) still rave about Rolen as if he invented the game. "Best baserunner I ever saw", ad nauseum.... http://www.redszone.com/forums/showt...len+malcontent Fears realized... Last edited by malcontent; 04-15-2012 at 08:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Retro-Gamer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,630
|
Re: Scott Rolen
Quote:
No player ever feels they are done plus he has 8.16 Million other reasons to play this season |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Retro-Gamer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,630
|
Re: Scott Rolen
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
malingered here too long
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,980
|
Re: Scott Rolen
Last edited by malcontent; 04-16-2012 at 01:16 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tn.
Posts: 772
|
Re: Scott Rolen
Very funny post...I visualize Rolen stepping to the plate with a mask on.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |