![]() |
|
|
#121 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Marysville, OH
Posts: 2,006
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
The NHL must be kicking themselves. If things continue, the Kings, Blues, Panthers, Senators, Flyers, Predators, Capitals, and Coyotes would advance. The Bruins, Blackhawks, Red Wings, Penguins, Canucks, Sharks, Rangers, and Devils would lose. Goodbye whatever meager playoff ratings the NHL would have gotten.
__________________
Variatio delectat - Cicero |
|
|
|
|
|
#122 |
|
Resident optimist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: east of WOY
Posts: 5,029
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
Great 3rd period by the Bues tonight. Turned that game around fast.
__________________
The contents of this post may be disseminated without the express written consent of the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball. Cincinnati's premiere expedited trucking company |
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,115
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
That was awesome! Onto LA!!!
__________________
“Our next home stand follows this road trip.” “I just want to tell everyone Happy Easter and Happy Hanukkah.” says on the day before Easter Mike Shannon |
|
|
|
|
|
#124 | |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
Quote:
NY, Boston, Chicago and Detroit are all fairly major markets to lose. Goodness knows Vancouver loves their Canucks, but it's pretty evident they are out soon. The Rangers still have a shot, the Hawks....maybe but I don't have a lot of faith. How bad will the ratings be if its Nashville and Florida in the finals? Or Phoenix and Florida even more so....a team that has no support against a team that barely eeked into the playoffs. Yikes. For hockey purposes we need a New York vs St Louis final [ie would be a great matchup]. For TV maybe NY vs LA?
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
|
Resident optimist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: east of WOY
Posts: 5,029
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
Yep, it's official, thanks to an impressive 3rd period and OT by LA tonight. Should be an interesting series with two good defensive teams.
__________________
The contents of this post may be disseminated without the express written consent of the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball. Cincinnati's premiere expedited trucking company |
|
|
|
|
|
#126 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,115
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
Outside of the first meeting between the Blues/Kings, it was pretty even. I know the Kings are 3-1 but I believe two of those games were won in shootouts. You know how futile the Blues were in that area so the 3-1 record shouldn't be a gauge into how well they will do. It will be tight and I wouldn't be shocked if most of the games went into OT.
__________________
“Our next home stand follows this road trip.” “I just want to tell everyone Happy Easter and Happy Hanukkah.” says on the day before Easter Mike Shannon |
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,115
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
I picked the Caps on a gut feeling and they actually won.
![]()
__________________
“Our next home stand follows this road trip.” “I just want to tell everyone Happy Easter and Happy Hanukkah.” says on the day before Easter Mike Shannon |
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Big League Choo!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The 513
Posts: 2,157
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
Damn right. I liked the way this team played at the end of the season. Add that to the matchup with Boston (who they beat 3-1 in the reg. season series), the return of Nick Backstrom and less pressure than previous seasons due to lower expectations I really liked their chances.
But man was that a mentally exhausting series. All 7 games were decided by a goal (an NHL first) including 4 OT games. |
|
|
|
|
|
#129 | |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,356
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,115
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
Excellent first round. On to the second. Here are my picks:
Blues vs Kings: This might be the most evenly matched of all the remaining matchups. I wouldn't be shocked if all 7 games go to OT. While the Kings have the advantage in goaltending, I think the Blues are a bit better in the remaining areas. Blues in 7 Coyotes vs Predators: Could turn out to the be the most lopsided matchup of round two. I just can't see any way the Coyotes win this one. I like what Smith has done in net for the Yotes but Rinne is practically the patron saint of goalies. He's unbelievable. The Preds are better in almost every single aspect of the game. Preds in 5. Rangers vs. Caps: I love the Caps and hope they win this series but I don't see it. The Holtby magic runs out. Rangers in 6 Flyers vs. Devils: The Flyers are the best remaining team in the East in my opinion. I feel this could be a shootout and the Flyers just have too much for the Devils to deal with. Flyers in 5.
__________________
“Our next home stand follows this road trip.” “I just want to tell everyone Happy Easter and Happy Hanukkah.” says on the day before Easter Mike Shannon |
|
|
|
|
|
#131 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
Blues vs Kings: Tough series here. LA was hot late in the season, and the Blues were among the best all season [post Hitchcock hiring]. I wouldn't be shocked by either team winning, but I think its the Blues that has enough to get through. Blues in 6
Coyotes vs Predators: The wound is still raw, but the Yotes did a lot to impress in this series. Believe it or not Phoenix was better defensively as a team this season, so I'm going with them in 6. Rangers vs. Caps: I still like the Rangers and what they are doing, but they had a tough go of it against the Sens who weren't all that impressive IMO. So that has me second guessing. I think this series could be a toss up, but I'll go out on a limb here and pick the Caps in 7. Flyers vs. Devils: I think the Flyers might just win it all when its all done, but, still too early to tell. I think Flyers in 5 here, narrowly missing the sweep in overtime.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#132 | ||
|
All Fired Up
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,422
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
Per Rotoworld.
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cincinnati USA
Posts: 3,319
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
Definitely not sad to see St. Louis down 2-0 and heading to Staples Center. Let's go LA!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Resident optimist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: east of WOY
Posts: 5,029
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
&$@)!!!
__________________
The contents of this post may be disseminated without the express written consent of the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball. Cincinnati's premiere expedited trucking company |
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,115
|
Re: 2011-2012 NHL discussion
The Blues embarrassed themselves and the city they play for. They should feel ashamed for that pitiful display they put on last night.
__________________
“Our next home stand follows this road trip.” “I just want to tell everyone Happy Easter and Happy Hanukkah.” says on the day before Easter Mike Shannon |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |