![]() |
|
|
#46 |
|
Party like it's 1990
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,328
|
Re: 5/1/2012 Reds vs Little Bears
Well, that sux.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
NL Central champs
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 443
|
Re: 5/1/2012 Reds vs Little Bears
Reds official twitter stating the obvious:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Senor Votto
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: 5/1/2012 Reds vs Little Bears
Does Arroyo pitch tomorrow? And I was looking forward to this game
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
CELEBRATION TIME
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 13,940
|
Re: 5/1/2012 Reds vs Little Bears
I guess they wanted to watch the NBA playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toledo
Posts: 504
|
Re: 5/1/2012 Reds vs Little Bears
Two off days in a row are killing me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 16,437
|
Re: 5/1/2012 Reds vs Little Bears
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Boom Goes the Dynamite
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Chester
Posts: 2,406
|
Re: 5/1/2012 Reds vs Little Bears
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Senor Votto
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: 5/1/2012 Reds vs Little Bears
Walt should be fired for this
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
thirsty and miserable
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,421
|
Re: 5/1/2012 Reds vs Little Bears
If he hadn't traded for Latos, this wouldn't have happened.
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement." |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,180
|
Re: 5/1/2012 Reds vs Little Bears
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,865
|
Re: 5/1/2012 Reds vs Little Bears
Pretty good. 50+ posts for a game never played. Looks like Leake will be skipped in the rotation. They should make this game up as a good old fashioned, 5:30 pm twi-night doubleheader on August 17th.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971 |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,545
|
Re: 5/1/2012 Reds vs Little Bears
Last night was a very strange night at the ballpark. The radar was on the scoreboard and TVs all night long so we were able to watch what was coming in. The delay for the first (technically second) wave that came in around 7:30 was justified and to be expected.
After that batch moved through, however, they could have played. Might not have got all nine innings in, but I would say for sure they could have got 4.5 in. My wife and I spent the delay in the safety of the Riverfront Club and from time to time I would walk around to the field-view side of the club to see a decent amount of people back in their seats with no rain and no movement on the field. A quick glance up to the radar showed the next batch of rain was starting to weaken a bit. So after nearly two hours sitting in the Riverfront Club I told my wife let's go back to our seats, they have to be in the beginning stages of starting the game. So out we go. I grab some coneys and we head to our seats. All the while, only the "emergency" type lights were on at the stadium. Not full lights so it kind of gave a wierd vibe to the whole stadium. I know they did it to save money on the electric bill and that's fine, just still never seen it done during a delay, even to start the game. The strangest thing of all was there was zero word about what was happening all night long. There was so much confusion all night. "It's not raining, there's nothing for a while, why aren't they playing or at least making the decision to call it now rather than have the crowd stick around for another un-needed hour?" As we were finally leaving the stadium, we were walking alongside a Reds employee who was on her cellphone angrily telling her (I assume) husband about the fact that they told them absolutely nothing all night long only to send them home. It was just strange to not even get a P.A. message along the lines of "we are still in a holding patern but a decision will be made within 'x' time period." Then we get in the car to make the two hour drive home only to find out that 75 North was shut down at the 74 exit and it turns out that it had been shut down by flooding for a good chunk of the evening. Why in the world would the Reds not let their crowd know that a major road for a huge chunk of thier existing crowd is shut down?? I am a longtime fan who goes to the park 20-25 times a year so last night in the grand scheme of things didn't bother me, it was just a tad frustrating. I fully get rain happens and that can make for logistical nightmares. However, a little info would have been helpful. If I were a first time visitor to the park I would have been left with a very bad taste in my mouth. As it turns out with only the emergency lights lighing the field, we were left in the dark all night long...literally and figuratively.
__________________
"Strickland Propane... Taste the meat, not the heat." - Hank Hill |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,668
|
Re: 5/1/2012 Reds vs Little Bears
I'm guessing the outfield may have been too wet and with more rain on the way, there was no hope that the field would be in playable condition at any point.
As for communicating traffic issues, I'm not sure that is a realistic expectation of any public event.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |