![]() |
|
|
#76 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,242
|
Re: 5/11/12 -- Nationals at Reds
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
getting younger
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 1,160
|
Re: 5/11/12 -- Nationals at Reds
Wouldn't even bother with Hoover or Sam. Make Leake go 7 regardless and Simon can finish the final 2. Leake isn't throwing hard enough to get tired.
__________________
Just have to tip your cap tonight... |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,832
|
Re: 5/11/12 -- Nationals at Reds
I blame the law of averages.
The Reds had a 3.17 ERA earlier this week. Saying the Reds and 3.17 in the same sentence doesn't work. The law took over. Bailey had a bad one, now Leake. Soon the team ERA will be around 4. Then the law of averages will go away for awhile. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,242
|
Re: 5/11/12 -- Nationals at Reds
I will change my avatar to Chris Carpenter if the Reds win this game
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
NL Central champs
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 443
|
Gio is at 41 pitches through 2 innings, so the hitters are seeing pitches. It probably doesn't matter at this point with the way Leake is pitching, but it is a good sign.
Sent from my LG-VS700 |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 331
|
Re: 5/11/12 -- Nationals at Reds
I wonder if the Red Sox would be interested in some kind of Leake/Bailey for Buccholz swap. All three of those guys seem like they've reached a point where a change of scenery or new approach might benefit them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Senor Votto
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,847
|
Re: 5/11/12 -- Nationals at Reds
Apparently Gio has one of the 'breast' curveball in the game
__________________
Most Vottomatic Player |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,242
|
Re: 5/11/12 -- Nationals at Reds
Not a bad idea at all, but I'd give Leake some innings in Louisville before I think about trading him. Bailey I'm convinced would be better off somewheres else
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,134
|
Re: 5/11/12 -- Nationals at Reds
You know, a few years back there were actually people on RZ who said they were happier with Leake than they would have been with Strasburg.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wilmington,NC
Posts: 5,323
|
Re: 5/11/12 -- Nationals at Reds
Thanks for the pbp
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,242
|
Re: 5/11/12 -- Nationals at Reds
Simon in....Desmond hits a seeing eye single over second base...
Bernadina flies to Stubbs 1 out |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,242
|
Re: 5/11/12 -- Nationals at Reds
Zimmerman singles moving Desmond to second
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,242
|
Re: 5/11/12 -- Nationals at Reds
Wild pitch moves runners up
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zanesville, OH
Posts: 1,242
|
Re: 5/11/12 -- Nationals at Reds
Laroche singles in Desmond.....this is hopeless. Somebody else do pbp....haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
NL Central champs
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 443
|
Let Valdez finish this one out from here. He can pitch.
Sent from my LG-VS700 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |