![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,266
|
Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
I knew it was bad, but .200? Wow. By comparison, the Orioles rank 29th in the league, with a leadoff OBP of .258. This is an issue that could derail a great season and needs to be fixed ASAP. Obviously Cozart and Stubbs aren't the answer.
__________________
"I talked to an advance scout that told me if Joey Votto and Albert Pujols were on the same team he'd advise his team to do the unthinkable...pitch around Votto to get to Pujols." - Buster Olney, ESPN |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
|
Re: Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
Cozart has been showing some signs of hitting there recently. I wish we'd stop trying to throw Stubbs there on occasion because his stats leading off are reallllllly bad. Well below .100 I would guess.
But yeah, it's a clear weakness on this team. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 440
|
Re: Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
DatDudeBP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
There are only two seasons - Winter and Baseball. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,084
|
Quote:
.59 worse than the next worst in baseball |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bridgetown
Posts: 1,418
|
Re: Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
lets say you have 6 decent hitters then 3 bad hitters.
id rather bat the best people 1-6 instead of spreading them out like dusty try's to do. yea you might be throwing an inning away but overall i feel we would hit more. i just can't stand when we get someone on and we have no hope. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 167
|
Re: Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
In my opinion, Hannigan, Phillips, and maybe Cozart (I'm projecting here due to the fact that I think he handles the bat ok and can probalby make better contact than many others on the current roster) are the only legitimate options to hit in front of Votto. So, you could put Phillips batting lead-off. I think Phillips would be better hittng 2nd, rather than 1st, but he's the best option for lead-off at this time. Hannigan I think would fit better hitting 2nd than 1st. The problem then is who hits 4th. Of course, I think that it would need to be Bruce - but I don't think Bruce is an ideal 4th hole hitter for this team either. Bruce is likely to offer even less protection to Votto than Phillips, due to the fact that Bruce is just not that tough of an out. He's certainly dangerous, but not especially tough to get out. I expect opposing pitchers would still often pitch around Votto. Nevertheless, with the roster as it now stands I have to think that Phillips hitting 1st and Bruce hitting 4th is best. The rest of the lineup appears to me to be a collection of good to decent 6-8 place hitters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 694
|
Re: Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
The only guy who it really makes sense to put in the leadoff spot is Phillips, he has the speed, and power, and makes contact. I'm sorry to those who think that hanagin is a viable option to hit lead off because he isn't. He has never hit any higher than 7th or 8th in the order for an extended period of time so i just don't see it as an option but another guy who could maybe help is Heisey if you gave him enough chances just not against lefties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bridgetown
Posts: 1,418
|
Re: Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 487
|
Re: Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
I was just about to say that. Now, I don't think you can move Phillips out of the 4-hole at this point but, if BP does move back to leadoff, Hanigan becomes your best #4 option barring a trade. He is their best contact hitter and teams are less likely to pitch around Votto when there is a low K guy next up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 694
|
Re: Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
I know he isn't hitting the best at the moment but he has been rather clutch so why not let Frazier hit 4th and move Phillips up to the leadoff spot?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 487
|
Re: Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
For me, Frazier is too inconsistent to bat 4th. Also, kind of tough asking a young guy who is still learning how to hit at this level to bat in a key position in the lineup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,574
|
Re: Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
You could say the same thing about Cozart in the leadoff position.
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bridgetown
Posts: 1,418
|
Re: Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
hanagin would work great 4th imo. won't strike out much and can put bat on the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,574
|
Re: Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
If they aren't gonna move Hanigan up in the order then move him down to 9th, which is one spot closer to Votto.
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 487
|
Re: Reds leadoff spot OBP: .200
Quote:
Stubbs is terrible in leadoff and the thought of having Hanigan there is laughable IMO. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |