![]() |
|
|
#211 | |
|
We are back!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Warsaw, IN
Posts: 675
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
Quote:
__________________
...and this one belongs to the Reds. |
|
|
|
|
|
#212 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 364
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ege_basketball |
|
|
|
|
|
#213 | |
|
We are back!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Warsaw, IN
Posts: 675
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
Quote:
__________________
...and this one belongs to the Reds. |
|
|
|
|
|
#214 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,266
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
Ohio State has been to the tournament 28 times, so they've had their chances. Yes, 11 Final Fours, but like I said most of their success has come in two brief periods -- '60, '61 and '62 with Lucas and Havlicek, and the Thad Matta years, starting in '05. In the 43 years between, two Final Fours. They've become really good under Matta, but still their only championship year was 52 years ago. That's a really long drought. OSU's FF total would easily put them in the top ten, but championships carry much more weight, in my opinion.
__________________
"I talked to an advance scout that told me if Joey Votto and Albert Pujols were on the same team he'd advise his team to do the unthinkable...pitch around Votto to get to Pujols." - Buster Olney, ESPN |
|
|
|
|
#215 |
|
We are back!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Warsaw, IN
Posts: 675
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
I can understand that but you have left a couple of "eras" out of your post. The Bucks were dang good under Eldon Miller in the early 80's with Kellogg and Williams. And the early 90's under Randy Ayres with Jimmy Jackson. I do believe they also made a FF under Jim O'Brien in the "modern era". IMO they should be in the Top Ten regardless of the number of championships. Look at UConn, they werent squat until the mid to late 80's and have multiple championships. Championships do carry weight but when you talk the best programs of all-time, I think being competitive over a span of 60-70 years should be weighed into the equation as well as FF appearances and tournament wins. It is a great topic to debate.
__________________
...and this one belongs to the Reds. |
|
|
|
|
#216 |
|
part of BBN
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,300
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
Looks like Davis may be a Hornet rather than a Bobcat.
|
|
|
|
|
#217 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,865
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
Good karma for Davis going to New Orleans since that was the city of his national championship.
The Hornets also have the 10th pick. You think they might take Terrence Jones with that one? Gilchrist will be gone by then and Jones should be around. I think 10th is about where he is projected in the draft.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971 |
|
|
|
|
#218 |
|
We are back!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Warsaw, IN
Posts: 675
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
Lucky Davis! Charlotte is absolutely the worst franchise in the NBA. The Hornets have a good owner now and a pretty decent young team. Hopefully Davis can help my boy out down there.
__________________
...and this one belongs to the Reds. |
|
|
|
|
#219 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 364
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
Still sort of about UK, so I'm going to ask your guys' thoughts about this. My roommates and I last night debated that Charlotte might be better swapping the #2 pick (MKG? Beal?) for #6 and #11 from Portland, maybe next year's first rounder or another player as well. They need A LOT of help. That one non-Davis player can't provide.
|
|
|
|
|
#220 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
Quote:
But why would Portland do that? They don't need Thomas Robinson, Kidd-Gilchrist, or Bradley Beal, as they have Aldridge at power forward. They need a center badly-- perhaps Andre Drummond at #6 or Tyler Zeller at #11?
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat." -- Christy Matthewson "Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot." -- Leo Durocher |
|
|
|
|
|
#221 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 364
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#222 |
|
We are back!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Warsaw, IN
Posts: 675
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
You fellas talking NBA got me to thinking about a discussion I saw on an IU board. I will put it in the UK context in the form of a question.
Who would you consider as the best NBA player that went to UK?
__________________
...and this one belongs to the Reds. |
|
|
|
|
#223 |
|
Yay!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,262
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
In the "modern" NBA, Dan Issel. Cliff Hagan, Louie Dampier (ABA), Jamal Mashburn would be my next 3. After that the pickins are a lil slim. Rondo will climb the list if he keeps it up. Too soon to tell on anyone else.
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done. |
|
|
|
|
#224 |
|
We are back!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Warsaw, IN
Posts: 675
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
That's the kicker dabvu......NBA. Dan Issel by far would be my first assumption. But he did alot of his playing in the ABA.
__________________
...and this one belongs to the Reds. |
|
|
|
|
#225 | |
|
Yay!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,262
|
Re: UK Basketball 8th Edition
Quote:
True. But he scored over half his points after the merger. Unlike Dampier, who was almost exclusively an ABA guy.
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |