![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,404
|
I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
From Fay's blog/tweets, it seems (reading between the lines) as if we could expect a rehab stint to begin in the next week or so for Rolen. I love Rolen as a player, but I fear his return to the starting lineup could sink this club.
Todd Frazier (while currently not qualifed) would rank 6th in the majors for 3B OPS right now. Second only to David Wright in SLG. Acceptable fielder based on my eyes, with hopefully room to improve. It's gotta be his job to lose now, no? *I am aware we are dealing with a small sample size with Frazier, but his numbers and his passing the eyeball test are what leads me to this decision of making 3B his to lose* But I (who almost always gives the FO/Dusty the benefit of the doubt in letting moves play out) can see what is coming a mile away. The reinsertion of Rolen into the everyday lineup. Does anyone on RZ want Rolen back in the lineup "everyday"? I would be suprised if so. I hope I am wrong on this and wiser heads prevail. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Vienna, OH
Posts: 4,142
|
Re: I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,416
|
Re: I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
I doubt Rolen returns as the everyday 3B. I see a situation like catching, a 60-40 split, probably with Frazier getting the 60, since he's healthy.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,404
|
Re: I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
I could go 75-25 or so, but 60-40 is still too much Rolen for me. I also failed to mention in my initial post that Fay has also implied Rolen will get his job back...but then again, it is Fay we are talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,416
|
Re: I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
Also, we are assuming that Rolen will be just as bad he was at the beginning of the season. The whole point of putting him on the DL was to improve his shoulder. Maybe it didn't work, but no need to assume that it didn't.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,404
|
Re: I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
Quote:
I'm not assuming that, and that is how I came to my decision. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: lake city florida
Posts: 794
|
Re: I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
If this team sinks it won't be because Rolens on the field.The bullpen and the bench have my biggest concerns right now.My concern is the pen wearing down and all the automatic outs on the bench.
__________________
"Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser." |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 277
|
Re: I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
Right now it seems Frazier is the 2nd best hitter on the team, so I would be concerned if Rolen took his spot in the lineup. I am not concerned about two or three weeks from now when/if Rolen is ready to play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,416
|
Re: I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
Quote:
Anyway, when I mean Rolen's shoulder gets better, I mean better than 2011-12. I also don't see Rolen playing regularly for too long if it's not.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,036
|
Re: I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
I'm sold on Frazier at this point a whole lot more than the Rolen we've seen for the past season+. As noted above, he's hit pretty darn well. I wish Dusty would stick him in the clean up spot for a couple weeks and let it go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,743
|
Re: I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
Here is a good example of the myth that Dusty will play the lesser "vet" player over the young guy to a fault, even after it makes sense to do so. I'd say we're a better team with Rolen/Frazier than Frazier/Cairo/Valdez, no? Obviously, I'm making assumptions that Rolen will perform better than the beginning of the season just as much as others are assuming he will stink it up at the plate. His D sure isn't being matched by Frazier, who can get to balls, but has an erratic arm. Rolen was still giving above average D, and more importantly, reliable D.
The answer doesn't always have to be "either/or," maybe Dusty will figure out a good balance that is performance based, well, like he has since being manager here (sends several to bball-ref.com to find the "vets" Dusty played over the young up and comer, what about Patterson, Cabrera, Taveras, Gomes, etc.).
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 380
|
Wouldn't be surprised to see Frazier in LF sometimes when Rolen comes back. Let's be honest though, Rolens return will be short lived. If surgery (again) didn't fix the shoulder, no way a DL stint lasts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,743
|
Re: I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
So, you have access to his medical diagnosis and are in sports medicine?
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,836
|
Re: I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
I'm hoping the return of Rolen sends Cairo packing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,404
|
Re: I'm concerned about Rolen's eventual return
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |