![]() |
|
|
#61 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | ||||||||
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Madison, MS
Posts: 713
|
Re: Reds @ Mets Sat. 6/16/12
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
15 total posts this thread ... is a single one actually positive about the team you supposedly root for? Even the Bruce comments ends with "before his next slump" The ONLY truly positive post was about David Wright, who does not play for the Reds. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,892
|
Re: Reds @ Mets Sat. 6/16/12
Big time effort by Homer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 404
|
Re: Reds @ Mets Sat. 6/16/12
Quote:
Fwiw, the Mets are having a real bad night at the plate. Bailey had nothing again that inning and they let him slide by. Amazing. They ought to show Mike Leake, I bet he is grinning ear to ear. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Quad Cities
Posts: 389
|
Re: Reds @ Mets Sat. 6/16/12
Quote:
![]() Your bank has terrible rates.
__________________
If evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will evolve! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Madison, MS
Posts: 713
|
Re: Reds @ Mets Sat. 6/16/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 77
|
Another complete game for Homer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,892
|
Re: Reds @ Mets Sat. 6/16/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 404
|
Re: Reds @ Mets Sat. 6/16/12
Mes needed that. It is like having a cig after 5 years.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Quad Cities
Posts: 389
|
Re: Reds @ Mets Sat. 6/16/12
Cowboy just said Hanigan was behind the plate - did he sub for Mesoraco?
Never mind he just corrected himself.
__________________
If evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will evolve! |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Madison, MS
Posts: 713
|
Re: Reds @ Mets Sat. 6/16/12
Quote:
Clause 1. Our team/offense/defense/player sucks. Clause 2. If by chance our team/offense/defense/player performs well, then the opposing team/offense/defense/player sucks even more. Similar to the shifting coach argument: Clause 1. Our Coach sucks. Clause 2. If by chance the team is in first place, then the argument becomes "with those players, any coach would be in first place" Which is often made by the same poster as the inevitably bad GM argument: Clause 1. Our GM is bad, lazy or senile. Clause 2. If the team is winning, then the GM is temporarily lucky and sure to screw things up in the very near future. In this bizarro paradigm, the ONLY relevant statistics are ones that reflect negatively on you team/coach/players/gm. I hope you are young, because the 70's would have been a very difficult era for you. Last edited by Brisco; 06-16-2012 at 09:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 142
|
Re: Reds @ Mets Sat. 6/16/12
What do you got now rage?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Quad Cities
Posts: 389
|
Re: Reds @ Mets Sat. 6/16/12
Homer cruises through the 7th as well
__________________
If evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will evolve! |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,892
|
Re: Reds @ Mets Sat. 6/16/12
That's two terrific efforts in a row by Homer against big time left handed hitting teams. Let's not blow this one. Pitching is the name of the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 404
|
Re: Reds @ Mets Sat. 6/16/12
The Mets are having a bad bad night at the plate. Meh velocity, a non-existant slider..........I think what has saved Bailey tonight is the splitter/changeup thing he throws......unlike the Pirates game. You can't tell if it is a fastball or not. When he has it going on, he can have far better games than he should.
If he ever got his velocity/slider going, then I would be a Bailey fan. Right now he is Arroyo/Leake. Bleh. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |