![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 510
|
Were will the Reds be in the standings on Aug. 4th?
I say they will be at least 7 games back. Mark it down. I hope I'm wrong but I'm not. No trades will be made and are offense will continue to be terrible. The bullpen is going backwards. The managing is awful. Dusty has no idea how to put a lineup on a card or manage a pitching staff.
This team needs 2 things to contend next year because watch what I'm telling you this year is over. 1) a new manager 2) someone to hit behind Votto Move Phillips to leadoff and put Cozart in the 2 hole were he belongs. Votto 3rd and someone behind him to protect him. Get these 2 things and the Reds are a championship team. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Big Red Choo
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 138
|
Re: Were will the Reds be in the standings on Aug. 4th?
edit: wrong thread
well, as long my post is here, i'll say 2 games up on top
__________________
Reds record when attended in 2011: 0-1
Reds record when attended in 2010: 1-0 Mute FS-OHIO; Turn on WLW Last edited by Spider Tre; 07-04-2012 at 09:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bridgetown
Posts: 1,447
|
Re: Were will the Reds be in the standings on Aug. 4th?
yup b/c from what they've shown we will be 7 back
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
malingered here too long
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,048
|
Re: Were will the Reds be in the standings on Aug. 4th?
I'll say 4 back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Manhattan, Kansas
Posts: 341
|
Re: Were will the Reds be in the standings on Aug. 4th?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 202
|
Re: Were will the Reds be in the standings on Aug. 4th?
yep 0-27 and counting Stubbs deserves as much time as he needs to prove he isnt a liability batting 2nd since Dusty is afraid to make him lose his position..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Manhattan, Kansas
Posts: 341
|
Re: Were will the Reds be in the standings on Aug. 4th?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,091
|
With regular PT Heisey was .333/.423
Neither deserves over 400 AB |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,091
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Manhattan, Kansas
Posts: 341
|
Re: Were will the Reds be in the standings on Aug. 4th?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Terre Haute, In
Posts: 722
|
Re: Were will the Reds be in the standings on Aug. 4th?
1st place on August 4th.....book it!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Were will the Reds be in the standings on Aug. 4th?
Dusty just doesn't have much to work with. Votto and Phillips (occasionally) are the only consistent hitters on the whole team. The offense is extremely weak (if you bet this team you'd make a ton betting the under). If Walt doesn't get a center fielder this team will be 5-10 games out by 8/4.
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Cuyahoga Falls Ohio
Posts: 769
|
Re: Were will the Reds be in the standings on Aug. 4th?
But the Pirates arent that good though, theres no way they can be that far ahead at that time
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Currently in MD
Posts: 874
|
Re: Were will the Reds be in the standings on Aug. 4th?
yes, base the whole of the season on a series where we play the NL's best team on the road and the Pirates play the Astros at home.....
__________________
Is it "next season" yet? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,091
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |