RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2012, 09:22 PM   #91
top6
Member
 
top6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: cincinnati
Posts: 1,637
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Hard to be too upset about this. They are losing on the road to maybe the best team in the AFC, and possibly the NFL.

Still, pretty disappointing defensive effort. Hall and Maleluga especially look terrible. Still can't believe Mike "Failure" Brown didn't franchise Joseph last year. He's pretty much the difference between the Bengals being really good and mediocre/bad.
top6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 09-10-2012, 09:26 PM   #92
Hoosier Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,854
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by top6 View Post
Hard to be too upset about this. They are losing on the road to maybe the best team in the AFC, and possibly the NFL.

Still, pretty disappointing defensive effort. Hall and Maleluga especially look terrible. Still can't believe Mike "Failure" Brown didn't franchise Joseph last year. He's pretty much the difference between the Bengals being really good and mediocre/bad.
Franchising him last year wouldn't have helped at all this year.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
---Joe Posnanski
Hoosier Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 09:32 PM   #93
Ohayou
Member
 
Ohayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 739
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutus View Post
The issue hasn't really been with the secondary. Flacco is making some nice throws against decent coverage. The bigger issue is that he's had almost all day to throw.
What coverage? Pitta, all of Baltimore's receivers, have been wide open all game.
__________________
Choo got it, dude.
Ohayou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 09:41 PM   #94
UKFlounder
Go Reds Go!
 
UKFlounder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,825
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Keep the current effort up and the ravens may get 50. What a joke of an "effort"
UKFlounder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 09:42 PM   #95
BuckeyeRedleg
Will post for food
 
BuckeyeRedleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,099
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Bengals crapping themselves on national TV once again. Some things never change.
BuckeyeRedleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 09:43 PM   #96
Stray
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

The loss isn't bad. If we're gonna get these guys it'll be at home.

That said we gotta learn to cover a tight end, we gotta get better coverage out of our secondary, and Taylor Mays cannot see the field until he knows what he's doing. Linebackers bit on every single play fake, D-Line got blocked by a suspect O-Line, and the tackling has been sub par.

Offensively we'll be alright. Much better than expected to be honest, we're going against a good defense and did some good things.

Defensively we have a looooong way to go.
Stray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 09:43 PM   #97
top6
Member
 
top6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: cincinnati
Posts: 1,637
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosier Red View Post
Franchising him last year wouldn't have helped at all this year.
Actually, it would have, as they could have franchised him again this year. Also, had he been franchised, he would have signed a long term deal.

LOL at the Bengals as they try to get fans to buy tickets when they won't even try to keep their good players.
top6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 09:45 PM   #98
Joseph
Tired of talk. Win!
 
Joseph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,127
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Hard to be upset about this? Well in the sense its only sports and not something important I agree.

Otherwise its an embarassment, which is essentially all this franchise is.
__________________

Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
Chicago Blackhawks - 10
University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
Cincinnati Bengals - None
Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98
Joseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 09:47 PM   #99
Oxilon
Member
 
Oxilon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,133
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

LOL The Ravens call a timeout just to yell at the refs. Bengaldom...it's a comedy of errors.
__________________
That hit was plenty fair. Atleast by a quarter of an inch.
-Steve Stone
Oxilon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 09:48 PM   #100
Hoosier Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,854
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by top6 View Post
Actually, it would have, as they could have franchised him again this year. Also, had he been franchised, he would have signed a long term deal.
LOL at the Bengals as they try to get fans to buy tickets when they won't even try to keep their good players.
There's a lot of speculation involved in your premise.

It doesn't mean they shouldn't have gone ahead with the Franchise tag of course.

But the Reds probably shouldn't have traded Hamilton for Volquez, at some point it stops being relevant.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
---Joe Posnanski
Hoosier Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 09:51 PM   #101
Ohayou
Member
 
Ohayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 739
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Unless the Bengals want Dalton to leave the game on a stretcher, I'd be getting Gradkowski ready.
__________________
Choo got it, dude.
Ohayou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 09:52 PM   #102
Hoosier Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,854
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph View Post
Hard to be upset about this? Well in the sense its only sports and not something important I agree.

Otherwise its an embarassment, which is essentially all this franchise is.
Nothing like hyperbole to help keep things in perspective.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
---Joe Posnanski
Hoosier Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 09:56 PM   #103
Joseph
Tired of talk. Win!
 
Joseph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,127
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosier Red View Post
Nothing like hyperbole to help keep things in perspective.
Spare me. This franchise was and is terrible. It has some incredibly talented players that I enjoy watching, and now and then things fall in line and they have a good season, but nothing ever seems to change. They are being out played/out coached, just like most weeks.
__________________

Championships for MY teams in my lifetime:
Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90
Chicago Blackhawks - 10
University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12
Cincinnati Bengals - None
Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98
Joseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 10:10 PM   #104
Hoosier Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,854
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph View Post
Spare me. This franchise was and is terrible. It has some incredibly talented players that I enjoy watching, and now and then things fall in line and they have a good season, but nothing ever seems to change. They are being out played/out coached, just like most weeks.
Hey listen if the Bengals are embarrassing for you, by all means don't let me stand in the way.

If you see the franchise now as the same one under Dave Shula, I'm not sure anything can change your mind.

The Steelers lost to the Ravens 35-7 in the first week last year, somehow they recovered to make the playoffs.

Simply stated, no matter how good or bad, no reason to overreact.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
---Joe Posnanski
Hoosier Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 10:13 PM   #105
cincrazy
Member
 
cincrazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Vienna, OH
Posts: 4,136
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosier Red View Post
Hey listen if the Bengals are embarrassing for you, by all means don't let me stand in the way.

If you see the franchise now as the same one under Dave Shula, I'm not sure anything can change your mind.

The Steelers lost to the Ravens 35-7 in the first week last year, somehow they recovered to make the playoffs.

Simply stated, no matter how good or bad, no reason to overreact.
I respect your unwavering support of them. But I'm with Joseph here. The common denominator between the Dave Shula era and this era is Mike Brown. That hasn't changed. And it's why we'll never get over the hump.
cincrazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25