![]() |
|
|
#61 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
|
Re: UK Football 2012
That's why I love you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
|
Re: UK Football 2012
The only thing that might save UK versus the Hilltoppers is the beating that they're going to take versus Bama this weekend.
Kent State has the advantage this weekend of facing UK with UK on short rest. UK is currently 7 (SEVEN!!) point favorites over the Golden Flashes. A loss to either squad would not surprise me at all, although they should be able to eke out wins. Hopefully the D will play better, they surely couldn't play much worse. I'll still be amazed if UK wins more than one game in the SEC.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by WMR; 09-07-2012 at 05:48 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 715
|
Re: UK Football 2012
I tell you what, I'd take Butch Jones in a heartbeat and wouldn't think twice about it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 715
|
Re: UK Football 2012
And Mitch is an awful fund-raiser, because he's burned all the bridges by taking money that was donated for football, and he invested it into all the olympic sports, and thus people aren't giving anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | ||
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
|
Re: UK Football 2012
I'm gonna bring this over here b/c that BCG thread will die soon (like BCG himself, it appears):
It was a report in a thread from a different board from the UK QB Club in Lexington. Here's the Rivals thread: http://kentucky.rivals.com/showmsg.a...id=888&style=2 Quote:
The only reason UK is making more than ever is due to ONE thing: the size of the SEC football welfare check UK receives each year is getting bigger and bigger. The only sports Mitch has improved are welfare sports that do nothing but drain money. Women's basketball making money? First of all, it's going to be a pittance compared to getting football straightened out; secondly, aren't there only like a handful of programs that even turn a profit? Look at how much we're paying Mitchell. The chances of women's hoops ever being actually self-sustaining are very, very low, and, again, the effort would benefit the University as a whole so much more if that focus was instead on FOOTBALL. That's Mitch's problem in a nutshell: The return on investment where he is spending the majority of the capital available to him is incredibly, unbelievably low. Apparently fundraising is a completely foreign concept to Mitch. He has spent the UK football welfare check on sports that no one besides the athletes and the athletes families give a damn about. If it wasn't for Cal, basketball would be in trouble as well. Mitch has alienated most of the big money boosters and they don't want to give him a dime. Mitch is very abrasive and about the furthest thing from a "people person/schmoozer" one could imagine. His holier-than-thou/smarmy approach completely turns people off.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by WMR; 09-07-2012 at 05:37 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
|
Re: UK Football 2012
UK has never had more funds given to it by boosters than under Barnhart's tenure.
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat." -- Christy Matthewson "Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot." -- Leo Durocher |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
part of BBN
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,304
|
Re: UK Football 2012
Guess Joker decided to try and give it a little more offense this season.
Showing some glimmers of hope on the one side but still the defense is going to have trouble. (may have trouble stopping the WKU running game this week) |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
|
Re: UK Football 2012
![]() Move UK to 1-AA. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,349
|
Re: UK Football 2012
Petrino is available, make a move before Tennessee does.
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,983
|
Re: UK Football 2012
That should just about do it for Joker. Worst team in the state not to mention probably the SEC.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971 |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,912
|
Re: UK Football 2012
EKU and Georgetown College want a piece of UK.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,422
|
Re: UK Football 2012
Quote:
I want Petrino. Don't care about the baggage or if he hops to a better job, but UK needs somebody who can jump start a program and he's the only one. I just hope he would leave the program in better shape than Rich Brooks handed the one to Joker. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Braintree, MA
Posts: 1,947
|
Re: UK Football 2012
UK not hiring Petrino (assuming he'd take the job) will follow a long line of idiocy in Lexington. They could have hired Roy Kidd, and had two shots at Howard Schnellenberger. They deserve what they've gotten for passing on those two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 715
|
Re: UK Football 2012
Just waiting for Scrap to defend Mitch again...
What a laughable joke, he's done for |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,144
|
Re: UK Football 2012
When you lose to the fourth [at best] public college in the state you know you have serious problems.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |