![]() |
|
|
#271 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Team looks a lot better with Scott mixing in there. Unfortunately he can't stay healthy.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#272 |
|
Resident optimist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: east of WOY
Posts: 5,029
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Can we have some offense in the second half?
__________________
The contents of this post may be disseminated without the express written consent of the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball. Cincinnati's premiere expedited trucking company |
|
|
|
|
|
#273 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,738
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
The answer is no.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#274 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
No running game and Miami is taking away all the deep throws. D needs to hold after that pick.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#275 |
|
You're being very UnDude.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,575
|
These guys are playing like the '90s Bengals.
__________________
Witty signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#276 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,738
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
The 90's Bengals would be down 35-6.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#277 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
With the tougher part of the schedule coming up the Bengals need this game. Gruden has to figure it out.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#278 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Really really ugly game so far. Dalton is usually money in the 4th quarter, he's gonna need to be today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#279 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
He's either getting no time to throw or when he gets time they are dropping the ball. Hawkins the latest to be infected with the drops.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#280 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
The Lawfirm needs to be reviewed by the BAR Association. I realize Miami is stout against the run but he has been flat out awful.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#281 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,395
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Geno Atkins! Critical sack there!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#282 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Gotta take advantage of the missed FG!
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#283 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,738
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#284 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,105
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Are they seriously having trouble with this Miami team at home?
I keep hoping they blow up these 2 games before PITT.....to at least have a cushion in case of a loss to PITT. |
|
|
|
|
|
#285 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
That was a pretty pass and catch
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |