![]() |
|
|
#61 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,677
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
Maybe there's a concern about overworking Bailey. Here are his innings pitched per season:
2012 208.0 2011 162.0 2010 132.0 2009 203.0 2008 147.2 2007 120.2 2006 138.2 As you can see, he's already at a career high. The last time he pitched nearly this much, he battled a slew of arm problems the following season. On top of that, he has pitched significantly more than he did the two years prior. Also, he's pitching better than he ever has over an extended period of time, so wouldn't that imply he could be due for a regression pretty soon? I just don't think he's as much of a slam-dunk choice over the alternatives as people are claiming.
__________________
Get MLBtraderumors Reds updates on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reds-R...33794710005587 http://i.imgur.com/1bCKpaH.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bloomington, Ind.
Posts: 351
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
Quote:
So, despite Home's obvious bad attitude about pitching at home, the Reds should use a precious playoff game to attempt to teach him that what he has actually experienced in his much poorer home game performances is actually random variability. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,677
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Lets Go 'Bird' Hunting
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The University of Akron
Posts: 1,105
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
Quote:
Bailey has done a superior job, on the road and more recently, in both things.
__________________
Hey Sparky! Indian Hill English teachers taught me everything I know! Numbers behind the Debate: Small Ball vs. Long Ball |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,625
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
Quote:
I would have gone... Latos - Game 1 Bailey - Game 2 Cueto - Game 3 Latos - Game 4 Arroyo/Bailey - Game 5 if necessary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,677
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
Quote:
If you are going to pitch Bailey 2nd on the raod, then you have to go with Arroyo in the 4th game, and your first game starter in game #5. With your rotation, assuming Arroyo goes #5, you have used the same pitchers as Baker, only gotten Latos pitching with 3 days rest. Or if Bailey starts #5, you've managed to get an extra Bailey start at home on 3 days rest. I can't see how that is an improvement. There is only two viable scenarios, depending on whether you want/mind Bailey pitching on the road. Cueto/Latos Bailey Latos/Cueto Arroyo Cueto/Latos. Cueto/Latos Arroyo Latos/Cueto Bailey Cueto/Latos It's clear all year that Baker wants Arroyo pitching between Cueto and Latos. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Where's my chair?
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,781
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
Quote:
If it goes to 4 games, the Giants will probably throw their #4 guy out there. That's either the lefty Zito or the struggling Linecum against Homer. (Am I missing another option?) I like those odds very much, even if the game is at the GAB.
__________________
Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2012 AND 2013! ![]() Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,659
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
From Lance McAllister on twitter
Jon Miller, voice Giants, just told Eddie and Tracy that he thinks the Giants get Latos in Game 2 if #Reds lose Game 1.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Box of Frogs
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,808
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,304
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
Quote:
Going into game 2 down 0-1 with Bumgarner vs Arroyo is not a matchup that favors the Reds. So like Ed, I could see it as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,625
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
Quote:
But the idea here is to hope by throwing out the best guys first that you'll end the series quicker and not have to go to game 5. If what Jon Miller set forth is true, that the Reds would put out Latos in game 2 if they lose game 1, I could be okay with that rotation as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 277
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
I think mixing in a different style of starter, had an impact. While pitching Bailey in GAB may not be ideal, I think game 2 was the best spot for Arroyo.
Basing your playoff rotation around your #4 starters inability to pitch at home is not sound strategy. Homer is a good pitcher. I think coming home with a two game lead is a good spot for him. About as little pressure as you can have in a playoff start and a home crowd to back him up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 4,284
|
Re: Dusty hints at playoff rotation... 3 man rotation, No Bailey
Kind of funny that prior to the series the biggest concerns were opening with two on the road, Bailey at home, and whether the offense would awaken. Well home field certainly was no advantage and Bailey was great. Oh well.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |