Cueto diagnosed with "Mild" Oblique Strain - Page 2 - RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion

Carin4Narron · 10-09-2012, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by malcontent

If that were true, why did they go on and on about back spasms being the problem?

Doc Hollywood likes to cover his butt instead of taking care of business. The Reds should had said nothing until they decided a course of action.

smixsell · 10-09-2012, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by malcontent

If that were true, why did they go on and on about back spasms being the problem?

To keep our opponents guessing.....which raises the question why spill the beans now? To that question, your guess is as good as mine.

smixsell · 10-09-2012, 04:19 PM

Here's my theory.

1)They said back spasms to keep our opponents guessing (when they initially thought oblique strain = out for the rest of the playoffs),

2) and now they've admitted it was an oblique strain for the same reason, to keep our opponents guessing wrong (ie Johnny is now expected back much sooner than your typical oblique strain)

Beltway · 10-09-2012, 04:21 PM

This is a shame, but I guess it'll even things out with the Nats not using Strasburg.

Biff Pocoroba · 10-09-2012, 04:42 PM

I think tonight's game just grew a little bit in importance. It's the difference between five days to figure everything out - or deciding on the fly whether to send guys out on short rest and/or shelve Cueto for the NLCS.

smixsell · 10-09-2012, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biff Pocoroba

I think tonight's game just grew a little bit in importance. It's the difference between five days to figure everything out - or deciding on the fly whether to send guys out on short rest and/or shelve Cueto for the NLCS.

Without a doubt.

texasdave · 10-09-2012, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by malcontent

If that were true, why did they go on and on about back spasms being the problem?

Exactly. What is the point of lying in that situation? I see none.

Helms1 · 10-09-2012, 04:57 PM

I would rather see Hoover start and use the pen long relievers in a game including Leake than Leake starting. But maybe he'll pull a "Bronson".

redsman344 · 10-09-2012, 05:02 PM

Fay just tweeted that Jocketty says on wlw that it's not as serious as thought. Hope to have him back in a couple days.

redsrolen · 10-09-2012, 05:05 PM

Back spasm in the oblique...great news...

Biff Pocoroba · 10-09-2012, 05:06 PM

To be fair, Fay was just retweeting someone else's post. Fay included a skeptical note.

He also just tweeted that Latos is dealing with the flu (though it wasn't bad enough that they sent him home).

Maybe the Reds are just fond of adversity and are in search of it?!

smixsell · 10-09-2012, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by texasdave

Exactly. What is the point of lying in that situation? I see none.

They did knowTexas Dave. I was told by a HIGH ranking Reds official during game 1 in SF that it was an oblique strain.

texasdave · 10-09-2012, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smixsell

They did knowTexas Dave. I was told by a HIGH ranking Reds official during game 1 in SF that it was an oblique strain.

Okay, then why lie about it? What is the tactical advantage? What did they gain by lying?

smixsell · 10-09-2012, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by texasdave

Okay, then why lie about it? What is the tactical advantage? What did they gain by lying?

To spread disinformation to your foe.

General rule----the less accurrate your opponent's info is the better.

texasdave · 10-09-2012, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redsrolen

Back spasm in the oblique...great news...

Maybe he was rooming with Scott Rolen. Are back spasms contagious?

10-09-2012, 04:19 PM	#18
smixsell Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: San Jose Posts: 1,025	Re: Cueto diagnosed with "Mild" Oblique Strain Here's my theory. 1)They said back spasms to keep our opponents guessing (when they initially thought oblique strain = out for the rest of the playoffs), 2) and now they've admitted it was an oblique strain for the same reason, to keep our opponents guessing wrong (ie Johnny is now expected back much sooner than your typical oblique strain) Last edited by smixsell; 10-09-2012 at 04:46 PM.

10-09-2012, 04:21 PM	#19
Beltway Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 34	Re: Cueto diagnosed with "Mild" Oblique Strain This is a shame, but I guess it'll even things out with the Nats not using Strasburg.

10-09-2012, 04:42 PM	#20
Biff Pocoroba Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 176	Re: Cueto diagnosed with "Mild" Oblique Strain I think tonight's game just grew a little bit in importance. It's the difference between five days to figure everything out - or deciding on the fly whether to send guys out on short rest and/or shelve Cueto for the NLCS.

10-09-2012, 04:57 PM	#23
Helms1 Member Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 125	Re: Cueto diagnosed with "Mild" Oblique Strain I would rather see Hoover start and use the pen long relievers in a game including Leake than Leake starting. But maybe he'll pull a "Bronson".

10-09-2012, 05:05 PM	#25
redsrolen Member Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 228	Re: Cueto diagnosed with "Mild" Oblique Strain Back spasm in the oblique...great news...

10-09-2012, 05:02 PM	#24
redsman344 Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 44	Fay just tweeted that Jocketty says on wlw that it's not as serious as thought. Hope to have him back in a couple days.

10-09-2012, 05:06 PM	#26
Biff Pocoroba Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 176	Re: Cueto diagnosed with "Mild" Oblique Strain To be fair, Fay was just retweeting someone else's post. Fay included a skeptical note. He also just tweeted that Latos is dealing with the flu (though it wasn't bad enough that they sent him home). Maybe the Reds are just fond of adversity and are in search of it?!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode