![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Party like it's 1990
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,474
|
Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
* He was completely left off the NLDS roster -- it's evident how the team felt abot him.
* Latos only pitched four innings on Saturday. He EASILY could have pitched on 3 days rest. It's not like he had a 100+ pitch outing last time out. This would not have been the typical "3 days rest." * Very often in playoffs, teams go with a 3-man rotation anyway. * Playing to set yourself up well for Game 5 or setting yourself up for the NLCS is a great way to lose Game 4. You need to go for the kill when you can. Latos was the obvious call. Ridiculous that Leake was given the start. Way to overthink this one! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 23,794
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
It wasn't stupid at all. It was still the right move. You don't treat Game 4 like a must win when it wasn't. Now you have Latos at 100% tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Party like it's 1990
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,474
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
See, that's where I disagree. I absolutely would have approached Game 4 as a must-win, especially with Matt Cain waiting for us in Game 5 and all the momentum on the Giants' side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Red Ox Dynasty
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,322
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
Quote:
Leake was the right option, like it or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Party like it's 1990
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,474
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
Quote:
1. He has a rubber arm. 2. Most teams go with a 3-man rotation anyway in the postseason. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Red Ox Dynasty
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,322
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
Quote:
I see one as being a clear Reds disadvantage and one as being a marginal Reds advantage (as the Reds have handled Cain relatively well this year). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 23,794
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
Quote:
The correct answer: none. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Party like it's 1990
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,474
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
The point is, the Reds should have gone all-out to win Game 4 IMO. It's like they wanted to hold something back "just in case." Not a good strategy in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Party like it's 1990
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,474
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Beer is good!!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,184
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
__________________
"Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Red Ox Dynasty
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,322
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
Quote:
I'd rather have full guns (Marshall, Broxton, Chapman, and to a lesser extent Hanigan and Rolen all off for a game, Latos on full rest) than what would be in the wings if they had gone all-out in today's game. Again, if they had lost (which they would have had like a 42% chance of doing regardless) today with Latos going, the alternative is a really poor one. Now, even though the game yesterday was lost, they are still only one win away from the NLCS and have every gun cocked and loaded, including Mat "The Giant Killer" Latos. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Red Ox Dynasty
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,322
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
They are in game 3 right now. Phil Hughes is starting tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 23,794
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
That's a 4 man rotation for you scoring at home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Worth The Wait
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 4,123
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
It was the right move.... I agree with saving Latos for game 5 at full strength especially considering he was sick. It was also reasonable to expect Leake to maybe give us 5 innings and keep them to 4 or fewer. Also reasonable to expect our offense to do the same against Zito.
Leake was awful today unfortunately. I was hoping he'd be "eh" like he was most of the year. But if the offense keeps pace it might have been a different outcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Party like it's 1990
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,474
|
Re: Where does starting Leake in Game 4 rank on the stupidity chart?
I take that back. I thought Girardi had said prior to the playoffs he was going with a 3-man rotation of Sabathia, Pettitte and Kuroda.
Whatever. I know most good playoffs teams have tradionally used a 3-man rotation. It doesn't change my point; especially when Latos only pitched 4 innings on Saturday in Game One. Can we all agree that wouldn't have been the typical "three days rest"? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |