![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
15 game winner
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sultanes de Monterrey
Posts: 4,172
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
That's how I look at it. He had a relatively good chance of picking up that base, so it's worth the risk. It just didn't work out. That happens. Even when something is a 95% chance of working it still means you'll have the occasional failure, that doesn't mean you should never take that chance in order to avoid that 5%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
I'm back... and forth
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,612
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
Quote:
Runner on 3rd, no out Runner on 2nd, no out No runner on, one out. Now tell me if it's worth the risk to take third? Also, please tell me if its worth the risk to take third, when they have you DEAD, and you're depending on an error from one of the best catchers in the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,917
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
Quote:
Making the 1st out at 3rd is like punting on 4th & 1 from your opponents 40. Obviously there's a ton of blame to go around in those 3 games and you'd rather have errors of aggression than ones of carelessness. But that one hurt.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
I'm back... and forth
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,612
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
It makes a lot more sense to try to get to 3rd with one out, than it does with zero or two outs. If you're on 2nd with no outs, you have a pretty good chance that the hitter will advance you to third, or a good chance that any of the 3 subsequent hitters will combine to drive you in. Getting to third with one out makes is a heck of a lot easier to score than it does from second. Getting to third with two outs means you would only likely score on an infield hit, and its often not worth the risk to run yourself out of an inning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,569
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
Quote:
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,930
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
Quote:
The way I see it, they had probably an 80% chance of advancing their odds of scoring by about 25% (from 60 to just under 85%) and thusly about a 20% chance of losing roughly 40% (from 60% down to 20%) off their chances. To me, that's worth the risk.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
KungFu Fighter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hamilton, OH
Posts: 2,328
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Monroe
Posts: 6,218
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
The best teams in any sport have players that trust their teammates and play the best within their own capabilities. The Reds don't have that right now.
__________________
This is the time. The real Reds organization is back. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,569
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
Phillips cost the Reds an expected .8 runs by his failed base running snafu. If successful, he would've only gained the Reds a .25 run advantage based upon the run expectancy matrix.
Wasn't worth the gamble. This was Brandon being Brandon.
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,930
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
Quote:
Twenty feet is one of the biggest exaggerations I've ever seen on this board.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
KungFu Fighter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hamilton, OH
Posts: 2,328
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
It was at least 20 feet despite the Giants taking their time getting the ball to Sandoval. He was dead meat and everyone in the stadium knew it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,121
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
Forget the odds, the play was right in front of him and he was out by a mile. You decide whether or not to go based on the odds, I mean should players carry an abacus around with them on the base paths? You decide to go based on whether or not you think you are going to make it. Bad, bad base running.
That said, in a five game series, there is always plenty of blame to throw around. I never understood the fascination of isolating one play and blaming a whole series on it. I could easily make a few dozen threads saying the same thing about other plays this series.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,828
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
When your team has an offense that can only score 8 runs in three home games in the playoffs, and where one first inning baserunning error becomes so critical, then I think the place to look is at the offense as a whole.
It was an aggressive play. It didn't work out. The Reds should have scored another run somewhere along the line against Vogelsong and Co. I remember the Dodgers with Koufax and Drysdale. They didn't score much but the pitching was so great they got away with it. The Reds pitching was very good this year, but it's not Koufax and Drysdale, the offense has to do better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,930
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
Quote:
It's easy for fans to play the game of risk management with the benefit of hindsight. Regardless, that is not a play that is made more times than not in that situation. I stand by my belief that it was about 80% chance of gaining 25% chance of scoring versus the 20% of losing 40. I think that's a risk you take.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
KungFu Fighter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hamilton, OH
Posts: 2,328
|
Re: Phillips' Boner (Fred Merkle)
Quote:
Considering he was out by a mile at third he was still close enough to second base to return to the bag when he saw the ball bounce back to Posey. Posey had all day to carefully retrieve the ball and casually throw to third and still get Brandon by 20 feet. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |