![]() |
|
|
#331 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Have we ever been able to defend a pass play to a TE or RB?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#332 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Lol smoked by the Browns. This team is a mess right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#333 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,090
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
What NFL can or really does on a consistent basis nowadays? They give the O every rule to help them. You need All Pro's at two spots at LB just to be able to help you overcome rules that easily allow TE's to run amok.
A lot of teams are having success with TE usage for obvious reasons. These guys are as big as OL with speed and the rules allow them to do what they want. |
|
|
|
|
|
#334 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
It ain't getting any prettier either, when we go up against competent offenses I'd expect more of what we saw in week 1. Defensively they're a wreck. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#335 |
|
Go Reds Go!
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,823
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Wow. This is why they still are the Bungles. One good year, then back to business as usual, it seems, just like the last few years.
__________________
http://www.civilwarobsession.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#336 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
At least Green is helping out my fantasy team lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#337 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,364
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
LOL. Bungles gonna bungle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#338 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
3 turnovers for Dalton...another pick 6 today. No rhythm on offense, iffy running game at best, bad penalties, lots of 3 and outs....ugly ugly ugly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#339 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 16,437
|
One of the worst weeks ever for Cincinnati sports. Looking at the rest of the schedule I see very few games this team can win
|
|
|
|
|
|
#340 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Hopefully talk of a 'good' season can be put to bed now. This wasn't a well constructed team and it's showing.
Cleveland? Really?
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#341 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Looking forward to the draft in October...seems about right.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#342 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Currently in MD
Posts: 869
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
At least there's hockey... oh, right...
__________________
Is it "next season" yet? |
|
|
|
|
|
#343 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,090
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
I do not see one game....even at KC or home vs OAK as a win down the stretch.
Just like 2010.....awesome to be a fan of this team. Never any hope at all from year to year, except for some blind nut ...squirrel thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#344 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,364
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
I think you can actually count on them being decent every other year. Record wise anyway. Play awful when you get the tough schedule, then play well when they get the easy schedule from being so bad the year before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#345 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,364
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Btw, are we all as sure as we were last year that Andy Dalton is the answer?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |