![]() |
|
|
#31 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,740
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
Quote:
That would be a very bad contract. And way more than it would take to sign him. Which players are you dumping to afford him? Last edited by PuffyPig; 10-17-2012 at 05:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,268
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
Ok, I see what happened. Somewhere this thread took a turn for the worse. We went from signing him for 6-7 MM per to 12 MM per. 12 MM a year is nuts. I thought the 12 MM was over 2 yr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,393
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
12 a year too much yes, 6 is a different story (said the man playing with others money)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Danger is my business!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Back in Florida
Posts: 7,855
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
2/25? On another thread I suggested he would get paid 3/22 or 4/30 and was severely mocked. Ludwick WILL get paid. I don't think it will be us.
__________________
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it." http://dalmady.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
All work and no play.....
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 6,843
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
I haven't read this entire thread. But I remember reading on Redszone during the season........someone in the know with the Reds said that Ludwick would not be back next season, and the club was ready to move on without him.
I swear I read that on here during the season. Someone in the know posted it.
__________________
"I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic. "Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
2013 NL MVP and WS MVP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,403
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
As I've said before, my #1 target is Choo. He solves TONS of problems for us. And he'll be WAAAAY more affordable than Upton.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
Quote:
Now I'm the Indians GM. I've got a few other teams inquiring on Choo. Put your best offer on the table. Last edited by kaldaniels; 10-17-2012 at 06:25 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
Quote:
Last off-season, we saw 7 players get deals for 4+ years. Every single one of them was both younger and better than Ludwick (although Yu Darvish was a question mark at the time). You could make the argument that Ludwick isn't even a top-10 outfield free agent, let alone top-10 free agent in baseball. He's more Jason Kubel than he is Carlos Beltran. He could be relatively expensive to keep around, but he shouldn't break the bank. And I'll reiterate that there's no way someone will offer him a 4-year deal.
__________________
Get MLBtraderumors Reds updates on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reds-R...33794710005587 http://i.imgur.com/1bCKpaH.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
Choo is heading into his last year of arbitration. He will become a free agent after the 2013 season. I'd say the Indians are likely to hang on to him until the All-Star break. But if the Reds are trading for Choo, you can bet that it'd take some starting pitching plus prospects to get it done.
__________________
Get MLBtraderumors Reds updates on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reds-R...33794710005587 http://i.imgur.com/1bCKpaH.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
Yikes, pay Ludwick that kind of cash?
I think we need Jeff Shaw in the bullpen.
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Rally Onion!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 33,225
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
Wonderful must be Ludwick's agent.
__________________
The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160 |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Et tu, Brutus?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,934
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
Any club will have to assume some risk if they expect to compete, so I would surmise Ludwick would need to be offered at least a second year even if one doesn't believe he'll continue to produce beyond next season. That said, any risk needs to be measured and I don't think it's wise to go beyond two seasons (at least without a club option) nor would I pay $12 million on the basis of expecting he'll completely repeat what he did this year.
So I'm in the camp of two years, $6 million per with a third option year.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,017
|
Re: Ludwick to decline option
I'd go 2 years $15 million with a mutual option for year 3. I wouldn't go beyond 2 guaranteed. The Reds can't afford to make those kinds of mistakes down the road.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |