![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,099
|
Re: A-Rod
All those guys are known for their leadership qualities. ARod is the anti-leader, exactly the type of guy that Jocketty has avoided his career.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
thirsty and miserable
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,397
|
Re: A-Rod
Quote:
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,826
|
Re: A-Rod
The Reds need a cleanup man with power and a leadoff man.
They can't spend a fortune on both. A-Rod at third could be the cleanup man, if he as cheap as indicated. Ludwick would move on. Frazier would play LF. That leaves leadoff/CF for other transactions. Risky? Yes. But the Reds would have to consider it if the price is right. A-Rod for $5 million would have to be looked at. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
thirsty and miserable
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,397
|
Re: A-Rod
H-Rod for A-Rod straight up, with the obvious financial kickbacks. Boom.
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement." |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,702
|
Re: A-Rod
I don't like anything about A-Rod, other than the fact that he could conceivably bring a .850-900 OPS playing in Cincy for a few years.
He likely has a better chance to have a Ludwick type resurgence than Ludwick did. And I think he might be a better bet than Ludwick to OPS over .850 next year. I also think he would love to come to Cincy. The place were dying bats get new life. Last edited by PuffyPig; 10-18-2012 at 02:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,099
|
Re: A-Rod
He'll be 37 and 38, and has lost an average of 50 OPS points over the last three years. And he never was a good fielder and has gotten worse.
I'd rather have Rolen back, even if he repeats what he did in 2012.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,099
|
Re: A-Rod
Quote:
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein Last edited by 757690; 10-18-2012 at 02:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,379
|
Re: A-Rod
A-Rod used to be a pretty good SS...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,345
|
Re: A-Rod
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,061
|
Re: A-Rod
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: A-Rod
He has gotten worse every year since 2007. There are stricter testing policies. He is owed over $100,000,000.00 and is under contract through 2017. That's right--even at the age of 42, he will have a salary over $20M. The media would be all over him and create a distraction for the team. At this point, Todd Frazier is probably just as good as A-Rod. There's no way it's worth the risk. Plus he probably has zero interest in coming to Cincinnati. He went to high school in Miami, so at least that idea makes some sense.
__________________
Get MLBtraderumors Reds updates on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reds-R...33794710005587 http://i.imgur.com/1bCKpaH.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,379
|
Re: A-Rod
Right I'm just saying the claim he was never a good defender just isn't true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,266
|
Re: A-Rod
I am dismissing it out of hand...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,069
|
Re: A-Rod
There is no chance of it happening in the corporeal world we inhabit. However, if the terms are similar to the post above ($5M for 2013-14, Yanks pay rest) and the cost is minor league surplus, yeah I'd do it.
We always talk about how good Dusty is at managing a clubhouse and handling a mix of veterans and young players - isn't this the kind of acquisition that perfectly matches that skill set? At the cost involved, isn't he a guy that could be jettisoned or traded quickly if he becomes a distraction? |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,379
|
Re: A-Rod
For the record I know it won't happen
But there are a lot of places far less desirable for A-Rod to go than Cincinnati. He's a competitive person by all accounts and we're sitting in a position to be competitive for a while. I think if we're winning, Rodriguez would put his head down and play. For all the talk of needing big lights to play, Seattle and Arlington aren't exactly the most glamorous places on earth either. Plus the Reds are a historic team. I think if A-Rod thought he could become a major part of a team's history, in ending one of the league's most historic team's long championship drought, he would probably jump at that. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |