![]() |
|
|
#91 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 31,094
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
Munchie still worries me, but so far, so good. Big time win today after Miami scored rather easily on the first drive of the game.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 31,094
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
Up to 21 in the AP poll. Coaches poll is not out yet.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
#20 in the Coaches poll.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
On the brink
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: is everything
Posts: 2,540
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
Not for long I suspect. Bummer of a loss.
__________________
How do we know he's not Mel Torme? |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,176
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
Brutal loss tonight.
You want to be taken seriously as a program (and as conference), you need to dominate MAC opponents.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 31,094
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
This team goes as Munchie does. Munchie throws two picks and one gets returned? You lose.
Also, what on Earth was Cincinnati doing playing AT Toledo? Things like that should never happen.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,176
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
Yeah, that's a game that needs to be bought out. There's no reason to expose your program on the road to a team that it gains nothin by beating.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 546
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
Quote:
That being said, there was really no upside to playing this game. Toledo has a nice team this year but even if UC would have won I don't think they would have gotten any credit for the win and a loss is considered a bad loss. Unfortunately I don't think this problem will go away anytime soon and is clearly the biggest impediment to UC making the jump to a quasi-big time program. It's tough to be a top level program when you have to sell home games vs. the likes of OSU and VT to scrape up enough coin to build something as rudimentary as a covered practice facility. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 | |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
Quote:
Munchie had a very poor game last night and hasn't been really all that good at any point this year. But we're halfway through the season, and I doubt Butch is going to consider a change now. I'm not sure what it will take to "fix" him. His mechanics are terrible, but he's not the first quarterback to have bad mechanics. He throws a very uncatchable ball. I don't know how many times UC receivers (supposedly very talented and deep) have dropped his passes. Other times, he misses his receivers entirely. The biggest difference between last night and his previous games has been his decision-making. Munchie had been managing the game and not losing it. Last night, both of Munchie's picks hit the defenders in the numbers. The pick six involved him staring down the receiver allowing the corner to jump the route.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
2013 Champs
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 269
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
Hey, at least you're in better shape than Auburn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Braintree, MA
Posts: 1,947
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
Big game Friday night down in Louisville! Winner becomes co-frontrunner (along with Rutgers) for the Big East title and automatic BCS bid. Should be a tight game between two good but very flawed squads. As a Cardinal fan, I can't wait for it. Are UC fans feeling confident about their chances Friday night? My Cards are 7-0, but they haven't exactly been blasting a lot of the awful teams they've been playing, so there's certainly no reason for anyone to think UC can't win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,176
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
I don't see how a UC fan could ever be confident with Munchie Legaux under center.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
#103 | |
|
On the brink
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: is everything
Posts: 2,540
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
Quote:
It makes me want to laugh and cry all at the same time.
__________________
How do we know he's not Mel Torme? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,800
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
CNNSI Upset special in college football this weekend. Televised.
*UPSET SPECIAL* Friday, 8 p.m. ET (ESPN2) Cincinnati (5-1) at No. 16 Louisville (7-0) The Bearcats lost to Toledo in large part due to the Rockets' defensive and special teams touchdowns. While Louisville quarterback Teddy Bridgewater continues to excel (73.4 completion percentage), the Cardinals' defense is a concern. It's allowing a 45.5 percent third-down conversion rate, ranked 103rd nationally. Cincy quarterback Munchie Legaux is ready to feast on that secondary. Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...#ixzz2AN68iWwQ
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 31,094
|
Re: 2012 UC Football Official Thread
Munchie.... still not a good quarterback.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com Last edited by dougdirt; 10-26-2012 at 11:10 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |